IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jchals/v13y2022i2p45-d907264.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Self-Direction in Physics Graduate Education: Insights for STEM from David J. Rowe’s Career-Long Methods

Author

Listed:
  • Carol Nash

    (History of Medicine Program, Department of Psychiatry, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5S 1A1, Canada)

Abstract

The ability to self-direct a research program determines graduate degree completion. Yet, research on incompletion of science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) graduate programs assumes students’ present level of self-direction adequate and neglects to recognize a lack of self-directed learning (SDL) as key. This essay explores SDL for STEM, presenting the work of theoretical nuclear physicist David J. Rowe as a key example of applying a process of SDL in practice. Rowe focused on this challenge of physics graduate education by promoting SDL through the type of research flow that has been found to bring the greatest satisfaction to researchers regarding their insights. Strategies he explored involved his space, time, open mindedness and theoretical contributions with students and in collaboration with colleagues. A self-directed learner himself, Rowe developed methods of mentoring for encouraging physics graduate students to recognize symmetry as valuable in identifying solutions to problems quickly—helping students take the lead in finding insightful resolutions to complex, multidimensional, mathematical physics uncertainties. These strategies for supporting SDL in this context are examined here, with the use of narrative research to interpret the texts and conversations exchanged with the author. The process of SDL developed by Rowe is presented with recommendations on how Rowe’s methods may be modeled to improve self-direction in STEM graduate education more widely.

Suggested Citation

  • Carol Nash, 2022. "Self-Direction in Physics Graduate Education: Insights for STEM from David J. Rowe’s Career-Long Methods," Challenges, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-21, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jchals:v:13:y:2022:i:2:p:45-:d:907264
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2078-1547/13/2/45/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2078-1547/13/2/45/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fernando T Maestre, 2019. "Ten simple rules towards healthier research labs," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(4), pages 1-8, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Cameron Mura & Mike Chalupa & Abigail M Newbury & Jack Chalupa & Philip E Bourne, 2020. "Ten simple rules for starting research in your late teens," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(11), pages 1-11, November.
    2. Zellmer-Bruhn, Mary E. & Forbes, Daniel P. & Sapienza, Harry J. & Borchert, Patricia S., 2021. "Lab, Gig or Enterprise? How scientist-inventors form nascent startup teams," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 36(1).
    3. Nigel Golden & Kadambari Devarajan & Cathleen Balantic & Joseph Drake & Michael T Hallworth & Toni Lyn Morelli, 2021. "Ten simple rules for productive lab meetings," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(5), pages 1-13, May.
    4. Kevin R Burgio & Caitlin McDonough MacKenzie & Stephanie B Borrelle & S K Morgan Ernest & Jacquelyn L Gill & Kurt E Ingeman & Amy Teffer & Ethan P White, 2020. "Ten Simple Rules for a successful remote postdoc," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(5), pages 1-9, May.
    5. Kevin A Janes, 2021. "Ten simple rules for being a faculty advocate of first-year graduate students," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(9), pages 1-6, September.
    6. Carol Nash, 2021. "Improving Mentorship and Supervision during COVID-19 to Reduce Graduate Student Anxiety and Depression Aided by an Online Commercial Platform Narrative Research Group," Challenges, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-18, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jchals:v:13:y:2022:i:2:p:45-:d:907264. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.