IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pcbi00/1006734.html

PAIRUP-MS: Pathway analysis and imputation to relate unknowns in profiles from mass spectrometry-based metabolite data

Author

Listed:
  • Yu-Han H Hsu
  • Claire Churchhouse
  • Tune H Pers
  • Josep M Mercader
  • Andres Metspalu
  • Krista Fischer
  • Kristen Fortney
  • Eric K Morgen
  • Clicerio Gonzalez
  • Maria E Gonzalez
  • Tonu Esko
  • Joel N Hirschhorn

Abstract

Metabolomics is a powerful approach for discovering biomarkers and for characterizing the biochemical consequences of genetic variation. While untargeted metabolite profiling can measure thousands of signals in a single experiment, many biologically meaningful signals cannot be readily identified as known metabolites nor compared across datasets, making it difficult to infer biology and to conduct well-powered meta-analyses across studies. To overcome these challenges, we developed a suite of computational methods, PAIRUP-MS, to match metabolite signals across mass spectrometry-based profiling datasets and to generate metabolic pathway annotations for these signals. To pair up signals measured in different datasets, where retention times (RT) are often not comparable or even available, we implemented an imputation-based approach that only requires mass-to-charge ratios (m/z). As validation, we treated each shared known metabolite as an unmatched signal and showed that PAIRUP-MS correctly matched 70–88% of these metabolites from among thousands of signals, equaling or outperforming a standard m/z- and RT-based approach. We performed further validation using genetic data: the most stringent set of matched signals and shared knowns showed comparable consistency of genetic associations across datasets. Next, we developed a pathway reconstitution method to annotate unknown signals using curated metabolic pathways containing known metabolites. We performed genetic validation for the generated annotations, showing that annotated signals associated with gene variants were more likely to be enriched for pathways functionally related to the genes compared to random expectation. Finally, we applied PAIRUP-MS to study associations between metabolites and genetic variants or body mass index (BMI) across multiple datasets, identifying up to ~6 times more significant signals and many more BMI-associated pathways compared to the standard practice of only analyzing known metabolites. These results demonstrate that PAIRUP-MS enables analysis of unknown signals in a robust, biologically meaningful manner and provides a path to more comprehensive, well-powered studies of untargeted metabolomics data.Author summary: Untargeted metabolomics can systematically profile thousands of metabolite signals in biological samples and is an increasingly popular approach for discovering biomarkers and predictors for human traits and diseases. However, currently, a significant portion of the measured signals cannot be identified as known metabolites or easily compared across datasets, and thus are usually excluded from downstream analyses. Here, we present PAIRUP-MS, a suite of computational methods designed to analyze unknown, unidentified signals across multiple mass spectrometry-based profiling datasets. Specifically, PAIRUP-MS contains a flexible imputation-based approach for pairing up unknown signals across datasets, allowing for meta-analysis of matched signals across studies that would otherwise be incompatible. PAIRUP-MS also offers a pathway annotation and enrichment analysis framework that links metabolite signals to plausible biological functions without using their chemical identities. Importantly, we validated both components of PAIRUP-MS using genetic data and applied them to study an example trait, body mass index. Overall, our results demonstrate that PAIRUP-MS enables previously infeasible analyses of unknown, unidentified signals across multiple datasets, thereby greatly improving power for discovery and biological inference.

Suggested Citation

  • Yu-Han H Hsu & Claire Churchhouse & Tune H Pers & Josep M Mercader & Andres Metspalu & Krista Fischer & Kristen Fortney & Eric K Morgen & Clicerio Gonzalez & Maria E Gonzalez & Tonu Esko & Joel N Hirs, 2019. "PAIRUP-MS: Pathway analysis and imputation to relate unknowns in profiles from mass spectrometry-based metabolite data," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(1), pages 1-26, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1006734
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006734
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006734
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006734&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006734?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. van Buuren, Stef & Groothuis-Oudshoorn, Karin, 2011. "mice: Multivariate Imputation by Chained Equations in R," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 45(i03).
    2. Tune H. Pers & Juha M. Karjalainen & Yingleong Chan & Harm-Jan Westra & Andrew R. Wood & Jian Yang & Julian C. Lui & Sailaja Vedantam & Stefan Gustafsson & Tonu Esko & Tim Frayling & Elizabeth K. Spel, 2015. "Biological interpretation of genome-wide association studies using predicted gene functions," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 6(1), pages 1-9, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Noémi Kreif & Richard Grieve & Iván Díaz & David Harrison, 2015. "Evaluation of the Effect of a Continuous Treatment: A Machine Learning Approach with an Application to Treatment for Traumatic Brain Injury," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 24(9), pages 1213-1228, September.
    2. Gerko Vink & Stef van Buuren, 2013. "Multiple Imputation of Squared Terms," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 42(4), pages 598-607, November.
    3. Gargiulo, Maria, 2025. "From disparate lists to population estimates: A multiple systems estimation workflow for mortality analysis in conflict settings," SocArXiv avc97_v1, Center for Open Science.
    4. David Kaplan & Jianshen Chen, 2012. "A Two-Step Bayesian Approach for Propensity Score Analysis: Simulations and Case Study," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 77(3), pages 581-609, July.
    5. Abhilash Bandam & Eedris Busari & Chloi Syranidou & Jochen Linssen & Detlef Stolten, 2022. "Classification of Building Types in Germany: A Data-Driven Modeling Approach," Data, MDPI, vol. 7(4), pages 1-23, April.
    6. Boonstra Philip S. & Little Roderick J.A. & West Brady T. & Andridge Rebecca R. & Alvarado-Leiton Fernanda, 2021. "A Simulation Study of Diagnostics for Selection Bias," Journal of Official Statistics, Sciendo, vol. 37(3), pages 751-769, September.
    7. Lin Lin & Rachel L Spreng & Kelly E Seaton & S Moses Dennison & Lindsay C Dahora & Daniel J Schuster & Sheetal Sawant & Peter B Gilbert & Youyi Fong & Neville Kisalu & Andrew J Pollard & Georgia D Tom, 2024. "GeM-LR: Discovering predictive biomarkers for small datasets in vaccine studies," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(11), pages 1-23, November.
    8. Jacob Joseph & Chang Liu & Qin Hui & Krishna Aragam & Zeyuan Wang & Brian Charest & Jennifer E. Huffman & Jacob M. Keaton & Todd L. Edwards & Serkalem Demissie & Luc Djousse & Juan P. Casas & J. Micha, 2022. "Genetic architecture of heart failure with preserved versus reduced ejection fraction," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-14, December.
    9. Aleix Alcacer & Irene Epifanio & Jorge Valero & Alfredo Ballester, 2021. "Combining Classification and User-Based Collaborative Filtering for Matching Footwear Size," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(7), pages 1-15, April.
    10. Rapp, Hannah & Fredrick, Stephanie & Nickerson, Amanda, 2025. "Cyber victimization reports between parents and children: an examination of agreement predictors," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 177(C).
    11. Huang Lin & Merete Eggesbø & Shyamal Das Peddada, 2022. "Linear and nonlinear correlation estimators unveil undescribed taxa interactions in microbiome data," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-16, December.
    12. Renate S M Buisman & Katharina Pittner & Marieke S Tollenaar & Jolanda Lindenberg & Lisa J M van den Berg & Laura H C G Compier-de Block & Joost R van Ginkel & Lenneke R A Alink & Marian J Bakermans-K, 2020. "Intergenerational transmission of child maltreatment using a multi-informant multi-generation family design," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(3), pages 1-23, March.
    13. Brian Nolan & Juan C. Palomino & Philippe Van Kerm & Salvatore Morelli, 2022. "Intergenerational wealth transfers in Great Britain from the Wealth and Assets Survey in comparative perspective," Fiscal Studies, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 43(2), pages 179-199, June.
    14. Wei-En Lu & Ai Ni, 2025. "Causal effect estimation on restricted mean survival time under case-cohort design via propensity score stratification," Lifetime Data Analysis: An International Journal Devoted to Statistical Methods and Applications for Time-to-Event Data, Springer, vol. 31(4), pages 898-931, October.
    15. Jie Li & Helin Fu & Kaixun Hu & Wei Chen, 2023. "Data Preprocessing and Machine Learning Modeling for Rockburst Assessment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-32, September.
    16. Christopher J Greenwood & George J Youssef & Primrose Letcher & Jacqui A Macdonald & Lauryn J Hagg & Ann Sanson & Jenn Mcintosh & Delyse M Hutchinson & John W Toumbourou & Matthew Fuller-Tyszkiewicz &, 2020. "A comparison of penalised regression methods for informing the selection of predictive markers," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(11), pages 1-14, November.
    17. Liangyuan Hu & Lihua Li, 2022. "Using Tree-Based Machine Learning for Health Studies: Literature Review and Case Series," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(23), pages 1-13, December.
    18. Norah Alyabs & Sy Han Chiou, 2022. "The Missing Indicator Approach for Accelerated Failure Time Model with Covariates Subject to Limits of Detection," Stats, MDPI, vol. 5(2), pages 1-13, May.
    19. Feldkircher, Martin, 2014. "The determinants of vulnerability to the global financial crisis 2008 to 2009: Credit growth and other sources of risk," Journal of International Money and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 19-49.
    20. Simon Schmidbauer & Maria Becker & Sonja Haug, 2024. "Online Political Participation of Refugees in Germany: Analysis of a Survey in Bavaria," SAGE Open, , vol. 14(4), pages 21582440241, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1006734. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ploscompbiol (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.