IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pcbi00/1005976.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Genetic programming based models in plant tissue culture: An addendum to traditional statistical approach

Author

Listed:
  • Meenu R Mridula
  • Ashalatha S Nair
  • K Satheesh Kumar

Abstract

In this paper, we compared the efficacy of observation based modeling approach using a genetic algorithm with the regular statistical analysis as an alternative methodology in plant research. Preliminary experimental data on in vitro rooting was taken for this study with an aim to understand the effect of charcoal and naphthalene acetic acid (NAA) on successful rooting and also to optimize the two variables for maximum result. Observation-based modelling, as well as traditional approach, could identify NAA as a critical factor in rooting of the plantlets under the experimental conditions employed. Symbolic regression analysis using the software deployed here optimised the treatments studied and was successful in identifying the complex non-linear interaction among the variables, with minimalistic preliminary data. The presence of charcoal in the culture medium has a significant impact on root generation by reducing basal callus mass formation. Such an approach is advantageous for establishing in vitro culture protocols as these models will have significant potential for saving time and expenditure in plant tissue culture laboratories, and it further reduces the need for specialised background.Author summary: Trials to find out the best combination of factors that contribute to the desired response takes up the chunk of time and resources in any plant tissue culture laboratory. The output of such experiments is analysed statistically to come to a conclusion. However, without prior statistical modifications, the results could be misleading. Recent reports from several labs point out the use of artificial neural networks to circumvent this. We have chosen to use a computational process that can predict the best combination of factors for the desired response after randomly testing the higher and lower limit of the factors with experiments. The magnitude of the desired response can be presumed at any concentration within this range using the models generated by symbolic regression. The procedure provides both optimum model function as well as the optimum variable values in the model. The variable sensitivity and percentage response add depth to the information thus obtained. The study indicated that these models would have significant potential for saving time and expenditure in plant tissue culture laboratories for the commercial establishment of in vitro protocols.

Suggested Citation

  • Meenu R Mridula & Ashalatha S Nair & K Satheesh Kumar, 2018. "Genetic programming based models in plant tissue culture: An addendum to traditional statistical approach," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(2), pages 1-13, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1005976
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005976
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005976
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005976&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005976?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Junzeng Xu & Junmei Wang & Qi Wei & Yanhua Wang, 2016. "Symbolic Regression Equations for Calculating Daily Reference Evapotranspiration with the Same Input to Hargreaves-Samani in Arid China," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 30(6), pages 2055-2073, April.
    2. Vladislavleva, E., 2008. "Model-based problem solving through symbolic regression via pareto genetic programming," Other publications TiSEM 65a72d10-6b09-443f-8cb9-8, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Daniel Anthony Howard & Bo Nørregaard Jørgensen & Zheng Ma, 2023. "Multi-Method Simulation and Multi-Objective Optimization for Energy-Flexibility-Potential Assessment of Food-Production Process Cooling," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-27, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Feng, Yu & Jia, Yue & Cui, Ningbo & Zhao, Lu & Li, Chen & Gong, Daozhi, 2017. "Calibration of Hargreaves model for reference evapotranspiration estimation in Sichuan basin of southwest China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 181(C), pages 1-9.
    2. Matin Ahooghalandari & Mehdi Khiadani & Mina Esmi Jahromi, 2016. "Developing Equations for Estimating Reference Evapotranspiration in Australia," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 30(11), pages 3815-3828, September.
    3. Xiaodong Ren & Zhongyi Qu & Diogo S. Martins & Paula Paredes & Luis S. Pereira, 2016. "Daily Reference Evapotranspiration for Hyper-Arid to Moist Sub-Humid Climates in Inner Mongolia, China: I. Assessing Temperature Methods and Spatial Variability," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 30(11), pages 3769-3791, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1005976. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ploscompbiol (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.