IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pcbi00/1005927.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Inferring cell state by quantitative motility analysis reveals a dynamic state system and broken detailed balance

Author

Listed:
  • Jacob C Kimmel
  • Amy Y Chang
  • Andrew S Brack
  • Wallace F Marshall

Abstract

Cell populations display heterogeneous and dynamic phenotypic states at multiple scales. Similar to molecular features commonly used to explore cell heterogeneity, cell behavior is a rich phenotypic space that may allow for identification of relevant cell states. Inference of cell state from cell behavior across a time course may enable the investigation of dynamics of transitions between heterogeneous cell states, a task difficult to perform with destructive molecular observations. Cell motility is one such easily observed cell behavior with known biomedical relevance. To investigate heterogenous cell states and their dynamics through the lens of cell behavior, we developed Heteromotility, a software tool to extract quantitative motility features from timelapse cell images. In mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEFs), myoblasts, and muscle stem cells (MuSCs), Heteromotility analysis identifies multiple motility phenotypes within the population. In all three systems, the motility state identity of individual cells is dynamic. Quantification of state transitions reveals that MuSCs undergoing activation transition through progressive motility states toward the myoblast phenotype. Transition rates during MuSC activation suggest non-linear kinetics. By probability flux analysis, we find that this MuSC motility state system breaks detailed balance, while the MEF and myoblast systems do not. Balanced behavior state transitions can be captured by equilibrium formalisms, while unbalanced switching between states violates equilibrium conditions and would require an external driving force. Our data indicate that the system regulating cell behavior can be decomposed into a set of attractor states which depend on the identity of the cell, together with a set of transitions between states. These results support a conceptual view of cell populations as dynamical systems, responding to inputs from signaling pathways and generating outputs in the form of state transitions and observable motile behaviors.Author summary: Cells in a population are not all alike. The differences between cells impact how each cell responds to stimuli, with implications for development and disease. How do cells change between these functionally important states over time? This question is difficult to answer using molecular biology, because these methods destroy cells in order to observe them, preventing us from observing the same cell more than once. Cells in culture display a diverse set of motility behaviors that can be observed non-destructively over time. We have developed software to quantify these behaviors, and used this tool to identify cell motility states and quantify the changes in cell motility states over time. Using this approach, we identify that cancerous fibroblasts behave similarly to normal fibroblasts, but prefer some behaviors to others. This suggests cancerous transformation may lead to changes between states, rather than just creating new ones. Applying this analysis to muscle stem cells, we measure the rate of change from the stem cell to progenitor state for the first time. We are also able to determine if changes in behavior state are externally driven or random, demonstrating the utility of observing cell behaviors to study changes in cells over time.

Suggested Citation

  • Jacob C Kimmel & Amy Y Chang & Andrew S Brack & Wallace F Marshall, 2018. "Inferring cell state by quantitative motility analysis reveals a dynamic state system and broken detailed balance," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(1), pages 1-29, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1005927
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005927
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005927
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005927&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005927?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Joseph T. Rodgers & Katherine Y. King & Jamie O. Brett & Melinda J. Cromie & Gregory W. Charville & Katie K. Maguire & Christopher Brunson & Namrata Mastey & Ling Liu & Chang-Ru Tsai & Margaret A. Goo, 2014. "mTORC1 controls the adaptive transition of quiescent stem cells from G0 to GAlert," Nature, Nature, vol. 510(7505), pages 393-396, June.
    2. Rebecca A. Burrell & Nicholas McGranahan & Jiri Bartek & Charles Swanton, 2013. "The causes and consequences of genetic heterogeneity in cancer evolution," Nature, Nature, vol. 501(7467), pages 338-345, September.
    3. G. M. Viswanathan & Sergey V. Buldyrev & Shlomo Havlin & M. G. E. da Luz & E. P. Raposo & H. Eugene Stanley, 1999. "Optimizing the success of random searches," Nature, Nature, vol. 401(6756), pages 911-914, October.
    4. John G Lock & Mehrdad Jafari Mamaghani & Hamdah Shafqat-Abbasi & Xiaowei Gong & Joanna Tyrcha & Staffan Strömblad, 2014. "Plasticity in the Macromolecular-Scale Causal Networks of Cell Migration," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(2), pages 1-17, February.
    5. Corbin E. Meacham & Sean J. Morrison, 2013. "Tumour heterogeneity and cancer cell plasticity," Nature, Nature, vol. 501(7467), pages 328-337, September.
    6. Kinneret Keren & Zachary Pincus & Greg M. Allen & Erin L. Barnhart & Gerard Marriott & Alex Mogilner & Julie A. Theriot, 2008. "Mechanism of shape determination in motile cells," Nature, Nature, vol. 453(7194), pages 475-480, May.
    7. Charrad, Malika & Ghazzali, Nadia & Boiteau, Véronique & Niknafs, Azam, 2014. "NbClust: An R Package for Determining the Relevant Number of Clusters in a Data Set," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 61(i06).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Abid Nordin & Shiplu Roy Chowdhury & Aminuddin Bin Saim & Ruszymah Bt Hj Idrus, 2020. "Effect of Kelulut Honey on the Cellular Dynamics of TGFβ-Induced Epithelial to Mesenchymal Transition in Primary Human Keratinocytes," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(9), pages 1-15, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Humberto Contreras-Trujillo & Jiya Eerdeng & Samir Akre & Du Jiang & Jorge Contreras & Basia Gala & Mary C. Vergel-Rodriguez & Yeachan Lee & Aparna Jorapur & Areen Andreasian & Lisa Harton & Charles S, 2021. "Deciphering intratumoral heterogeneity using integrated clonal tracking and single-cell transcriptome analyses," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 12(1), pages 1-14, December.
    2. Jacob M Kowalewski & Hamdah Shafqat-Abbasi & Mehrdad Jafari-Mamaghani & Bereket Endrias Ganebo & Xiaowei Gong & Staffan Strömblad & John G Lock, 2015. "Disentangling Membrane Dynamics and Cell Migration; Differential Influences of F-actin and Cell-Matrix Adhesions," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(8), pages 1-23, August.
    3. Shiqian Ma & Daniel Johnson & Cody Ashby & Donghai Xiong & Carole L Cramer & Jason H Moore & Shuzhong Zhang & Xiuzhen Huang, 2015. "SPARCoC: A New Framework for Molecular Pattern Discovery and Cancer Gene Identification," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(3), pages 1-19, March.
    4. Ferreira, A.S. & Raposo, E.P. & Viswanathan, G.M. & da Luz, M.G.E., 2012. "The influence of the environment on Lévy random search efficiency: Fractality and memory effects," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 391(11), pages 3234-3246.
    5. Priscila C A da Silva & Tiago V Rosembach & Anésia A Santos & Márcio S Rocha & Marcelo L Martins, 2014. "Normal and Tumoral Melanocytes Exhibit q-Gaussian Random Search Patterns," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(9), pages 1-13, September.
    6. Bolívar, Fernando & Duran, Miguel A. & Lozano-Vivas, Ana, 2023. "Bank business models, size, and profitability," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 53(C).
    7. Remy Elbez & Jeff Folz & Alan McLean & Hernan Roca & Joseph M Labuz & Kenneth J Pienta & Shuichi Takayama & Raoul Kopelman, 2021. "Cell-morphodynamic phenotype classification with application to cancer metastasis using cell magnetorotation and machine-learning," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(11), pages 1-14, November.
    8. Reder, Maik & Yürüşen, Nurseda Y. & Melero, Julio J., 2018. "Data-driven learning framework for associating weather conditions and wind turbine failures," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 554-569.
    9. Marcin Gąsior, 2021. "Environmental Attitudes and Willingness to Purchase Online—Classification Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-17, August.
    10. Roopam Shukla & Ankit Agarwal & Kamna Sachdeva & Juergen Kurths & P. K. Joshi, 2019. "Climate change perception: an analysis of climate change and risk perceptions among farmer types of Indian Western Himalayas," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 152(1), pages 103-119, January.
    11. Chao Jiang & Hong-Yu Luo & Xinpeng Xu & Shuo-Xing Dou & Wei Li & Dongshi Guan & Fangfu Ye & Xiaosong Chen & Ming Guo & Peng-Ye Wang & Hui Li, 2023. "Switch of cell migration modes orchestrated by changes of three-dimensional lamellipodium structure and intracellular diffusion," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-13, December.
    12. Saemi Shin & Won Suck Yoon & Sang-Hoon Byeon, 2022. "Trends in Occupational Infectious Diseases in South Korea and Classification of Industries According to the Risk of Biological Hazards Using K-Means Clustering," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-19, September.
    13. Ma, Brian O. & Davis, Brad H. & Gillespie, David R. & VanLaerhoven, Sherah L., 2009. "Incorporating behaviour into simple models of dispersal using the biological control agent Dicyphus hesperus," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 220(23), pages 3271-3279.
    14. Marina E Wosniack & Marcos C Santos & Ernesto P Raposo & Gandhi M Viswanathan & Marcos G E da Luz, 2017. "The evolutionary origins of Lévy walk foraging," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(10), pages 1-31, October.
    15. Song He & Xinyu Song & Xiaoxi Yang & Jijun Yu & Yuqi Wen & Lianlian Wu & Bowei Yan & Jiannan Feng & Xiaochen Bo, 2021. "COMSUC: A web server for the identification of consensus molecular subtypes of cancer based on multiple methods and multi-omics data," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(3), pages 1-10, March.
    16. Seong Eun Lee & Seongyeol Park & Shinae Yi & Na Rae Choi & Mi Ae Lim & Jae Won Chang & Ho-Ryun Won & Je Ryong Kim & Hye Mi Ko & Eun-Jae Chung & Young Joo Park & Sun Wook Cho & Hyeong Won Yu & June You, 2024. "Unraveling the role of the mitochondrial one-carbon pathway in undifferentiated thyroid cancer by multi-omics analyses," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-17, December.
    17. Jihane El Ouadi & Hanae Errousso & Nicolas Malhene & Siham Benhadou & Hicham Medromi, 2022. "A machine-learning based hybrid algorithm for strategic location of urban bundling hubs to support shared public transport," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 56(5), pages 3215-3258, October.
    18. Cyril Atkinson-Clement & Eléonore Pigalle, 2021. "What can we learn from Covid-19 pandemic’s impact on human behaviour? The case of France’s lockdown," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 8(1), pages 1-12, December.
    19. Yang Qi & Pulin Gong, 2022. "Fractional neural sampling as a theory of spatiotemporal probabilistic computations in neural circuits," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-19, December.
    20. Cody T Ross & Bruce Winterhalder, 2018. "Evidence for encounter-conditional, area-restricted search in a preliminary study of Colombian blowgun hunters," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(12), pages 1-13, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1005927. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ploscompbiol (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.