IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pcbi00/1005649.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Decoding brain activity using a large-scale probabilistic functional-anatomical atlas of human cognition

Author

Listed:
  • Timothy N Rubin
  • Oluwasanmi Koyejo
  • Krzysztof J Gorgolewski
  • Michael N Jones
  • Russell A Poldrack
  • Tal Yarkoni

Abstract

A central goal of cognitive neuroscience is to decode human brain activity—that is, to infer mental processes from observed patterns of whole-brain activation. Previous decoding efforts have focused on classifying brain activity into a small set of discrete cognitive states. To attain maximal utility, a decoding framework must be open-ended, systematic, and context-sensitive—that is, capable of interpreting numerous brain states, presented in arbitrary combinations, in light of prior information. Here we take steps towards this objective by introducing a probabilistic decoding framework based on a novel topic model—Generalized Correspondence Latent Dirichlet Allocation—that learns latent topics from a database of over 11,000 published fMRI studies. The model produces highly interpretable, spatially-circumscribed topics that enable flexible decoding of whole-brain images. Importantly, the Bayesian nature of the model allows one to “seed” decoder priors with arbitrary images and text—enabling researchers, for the first time, to generate quantitative, context-sensitive interpretations of whole-brain patterns of brain activity.Author summary: A central goal of cognitive neuroscience is to decode human brain activity—i.e., to be able to infer mental processes from observed patterns of whole-brain activity. However, existing approaches to brain decoding suffer from a number of important limitations—for example, they often work only in one narrow domain of cognition, and cannot be easily generalized to novel contexts. Here we address such limitations by introducing a simple probabilistic framework based on a novel topic modeling approach. We use our approach to extract a set of highly interpretable latent “topics” from a large meta-analytic database of over 11,000 published fMRI studies. Each topic is associated with a single brain region and a set of semantically coherent cognitive functions. We demonstrate how these topics can be used to automatically “decode” brain activity in an open-ended way, enabling researchers to draw tentative conclusions about mental function on the basis of virtually any pattern of whole-brain activity. We highlight several important features of our framework, notably including the ability to take into account knowledge of the experimental context and/or prior experimenter belief.

Suggested Citation

  • Timothy N Rubin & Oluwasanmi Koyejo & Krzysztof J Gorgolewski & Michael N Jones & Russell A Poldrack & Tal Yarkoni, 2017. "Decoding brain activity using a large-scale probabilistic functional-anatomical atlas of human cognition," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(10), pages 1-24, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1005649
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005649
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005649
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005649&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005649?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Alexander G. Huth & Wendy A. de Heer & Thomas L. Griffiths & Frédéric E. Theunissen & Jack L. Gallant, 2016. "Natural speech reveals the semantic maps that tile human cerebral cortex," Nature, Nature, vol. 532(7600), pages 453-458, April.
    2. Jeremy R Manning & Rajesh Ranganath & Kenneth A Norman & David M Blei, 2014. "Topographic Factor Analysis: A Bayesian Model for Inferring Brain Networks from Neural Data," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(5), pages 1-14, May.
    3. L. H. Snyder & A. P. Batista & R. A. Andersen, 1997. "Coding of intention in the posterior parietal cortex," Nature, Nature, vol. 386(6621), pages 167-170, March.
    4. Kay H Brodersen & Thomas M Schofield & Alexander P Leff & Cheng Soon Ong & Ekaterina I Lomakina & Joachim M Buhmann & Klaas E Stephan, 2011. "Generative Embedding for Model-Based Classification of fMRI Data," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(6), pages 1-19, June.
    5. Danilo Bzdok & Gaël Varoquaux & Olivier Grisel & Michael Eickenberg & Cyril Poupon & Bertrand Thirion, 2016. "Formal Models of the Network Co-occurrence Underlying Mental Operations," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(6), pages 1-31, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ana Sofía Ríos & Simón Oxenford & Clemens Neudorfer & Konstantin Butenko & Ningfei Li & Nanditha Rajamani & Alexandre Boutet & Gavin J. B. Elias & Jurgen Germann & Aaron Loh & Wissam Deeb & Fuyixue Wa, 2022. "Optimal deep brain stimulation sites and networks for stimulation of the fornix in Alzheimer’s disease," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-14, December.
    2. Joyneel Misra & Srinivas Govinda Surampudi & Manasij Venkatesh & Chirag Limbachia & Joseph Jaja & Luiz Pessoa, 2021. "Learning brain dynamics for decoding and predicting individual differences," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(9), pages 1-25, September.
    3. D. Jones & V. Lowe & J. Graff-Radford & H. Botha & L. Barnard & D. Wiepert & M. C. Murphy & M. Murray & M. Senjem & J. Gunter & H. Wiste & B. Boeve & D. Knopman & R. Petersen & C. Jack, 2022. "A computational model of neurodegeneration in Alzheimer’s disease," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-13, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chandan Singh & Armin Askari & Rich Caruana & Jianfeng Gao, 2023. "Augmenting interpretable models with large language models during training," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-11, December.
    2. Katherine Farrow & Gilles Grolleau & Naoufel Mzoughi, 2018. "What in the Word! The Scope for the Effect of Word Choice on Economic Behavior," Kyklos, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 71(4), pages 557-580, November.
    3. Sam V Norman-Haignere & Josh H McDermott, 2018. "Neural responses to natural and model-matched stimuli reveal distinct computations in primary and nonprimary auditory cortex," PLOS Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(12), pages 1-46, December.
    4. Lorenza Lucchi Basili & Pier Luigi Sacco, 2017. "Tie-Up Cycles in Long-Term Mating. Part II: Fictional Narratives and the Social Cognition of Mating," Challenges, MDPI, vol. 8(1), pages 1-60, February.
    5. Keiko Ohmae & Shogo Ohmae, 2024. "Emergence of syntax and word prediction in an artificial neural circuit of the cerebellum," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-13, December.
    6. Glimcher, Paul W. & Dorris, Michael C. & Bayer, Hannah M., 2005. "Physiological utility theory and the neuroeconomics of choice," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 52(2), pages 213-256, August.
    7. Francesca Setti & Giacomo Handjaras & Davide Bottari & Andrea Leo & Matteo Diano & Valentina Bruno & Carla Tinti & Luca Cecchetti & Francesca Garbarini & Pietro Pietrini & Emiliano Ricciardi, 2023. "A modality-independent proto-organization of human multisensory areas," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 7(3), pages 397-410, March.
    8. Desjardins, Christoph, 2021. "Don't be too SMART, but SAVE your goals: Proposal for a renewed goal-setting formula for Generation Y," Journal of Applied Leadership and Management, Hochschule Kempten - University of Applied Sciences, Professional School of Business & Technology, vol. 9, pages 73-87.
    9. Charlotte Caucheteux & Alexandre Gramfort & Jean-Rémi King, 2023. "Evidence of a predictive coding hierarchy in the human brain listening to speech," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 7(3), pages 430-441, March.
    10. Maryam Honari-Jahromi & Brea Chouinard & Esti Blanco-Elorrieta & Liina Pylkkänen & Alona Fyshe, 2021. "Neural representation of words within phrases: Temporal evolution of color-adjectives and object-nouns during simple composition," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(3), pages 1-17, March.
    11. Xue L. Gong & Alexander G. Huth & Fatma Deniz & Keith Johnson & Jack L. Gallant & Frédéric E. Theunissen, 2023. "Phonemic segmentation of narrative speech in human cerebral cortex," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-17, December.
    12. Zsuzsanna Kocsis & Rick L. Jenison & Peter N. Taylor & Ryan M. Calmus & Bob McMurray & Ariane E. Rhone & McCall E. Sarrett & Carolina Deifelt Streese & Yukiko Kikuchi & Phillip E. Gander & Joel I. Ber, 2023. "Immediate neural impact and incomplete compensation after semantic hub disconnection," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-17, December.
    13. Jianzhong Chen & Angela Tam & Valeria Kebets & Csaba Orban & Leon Qi Rong Ooi & Christopher L. Asplund & Scott Marek & Nico U. F. Dosenbach & Simon B. Eickhoff & Danilo Bzdok & Avram J. Holmes & B. T., 2022. "Shared and unique brain network features predict cognitive, personality, and mental health scores in the ABCD study," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-17, December.
    14. David M Alexander & Tonio Ball & Andreas Schulze-Bonhage & Cees van Leeuwen, 2019. "Large-scale cortical travelling waves predict localized future cortical signals," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(11), pages 1-34, November.
    15. Sheng Zhang & Miguel P Eckstein, 2010. "Evolution and Optimality of Similar Neural Mechanisms for Perception and Action during Search," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(9), pages 1-11, September.
    16. Jörn Diedrichsen & Nikolaus Kriegeskorte, 2017. "Representational models: A common framework for understanding encoding, pattern-component, and representational-similarity analysis," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(4), pages 1-33, April.
    17. Eduardo A Aponte & Dario Schöbi & Klaas E Stephan & Jakob Heinzle, 2017. "The Stochastic Early Reaction, Inhibition, and late Action (SERIA) model for antisaccades," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(8), pages 1-36, August.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1005649. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ploscompbiol (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.