IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pcbi00/1005452.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Heterogeneous firing responses predict diverse couplings to presynaptic activity in mice layer V pyramidal neurons

Author

Listed:
  • Yann Zerlaut
  • Alain Destexhe

Abstract

In this study, we present a theoretical framework combining experimental characterizations and analytical calculus to capture the firing rate input-output properties of single neurons in the fluctuation-driven regime. Our framework consists of a two-step procedure to treat independently how the dendritic input translates into somatic fluctuation variables, and how the latter determine action potential firing. We use this framework to investigate the functional impact of the heterogeneity in firing responses found experimentally in young mice layer V pyramidal cells. We first design and calibrate in vitro a simplified morphological model of layer V pyramidal neurons with a dendritic tree following Rall's branching rule. Then, we propose an analytical derivation for the membrane potential fluctuations at the soma as a function of the properties of the synaptic input in dendrites. This mathematical description allows us to easily emulate various forms of synaptic input: either balanced, unbalanced, synchronized, purely proximal or purely distal synaptic activity. We find that those different forms of dendritic input activity lead to various impact on the somatic membrane potential fluctuations properties, thus raising the possibility that individual neurons will differentially couple to specific forms of activity as a result of their different firing response. We indeed found such a heterogeneous coupling between synaptic input and firing response for all types of presynaptic activity. This heterogeneity can be explained by different levels of cellular excitability in the case of the balanced, unbalanced, synchronized and purely distal activity. A notable exception appears for proximal dendritic inputs: increasing the input level can either promote firing response in some cells, or suppress it in some other cells whatever their individual excitability. This behavior can be explained by different sensitivities to the speed of the fluctuations, which was previously associated to different levels of sodium channel inactivation and density. Because local network connectivity rather targets proximal dendrites, our results suggest that this aspect of biophysical heterogeneity might be relevant to neocortical processing by controlling how individual neurons couple to local network activity.Author summary: Neocortical processing of sensory input relies on the specific activation of subpopulations within the cortical network. Though specific circuitry is thought to be the primary mechanism underlying this functional principle, we explore here a putative complementary mechanism: whether diverse biophysical features in single neurons contribute to such differential activation. In a previous study, we reported that, in young mice visual cortex, individual neurons differ not only in their excitability but also in their sensitivities to the properties of the membrane potential fluctuations. In the present work, we analyze how this heterogeneity is translated into diverse input-output properties in the context of low synchrony population dynamics. As expected, we found that individual neurons couple differentially to specific form of presynaptic activity (emulating afferent stimuli of various properties) mostly because of their differences in excitability. However, we also found that the response to proximal dendritic input was controlled by the sensitivity to the speed of the fluctuations (which can be linked to various levels of density of sodium channels and sodium inactivation). Our study thus proposes a novel quantitative insight into the functional impact of biophysical heterogeneity: because of their various firing responses to fluctuations, individual neurons will differentially couple to local network activity.

Suggested Citation

  • Yann Zerlaut & Alain Destexhe, 2017. "Heterogeneous firing responses predict diverse couplings to presynaptic activity in mice layer V pyramidal neurons," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(4), pages 1-27, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1005452
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005452
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005452
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005452&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005452?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Michael Okun & Nicholas A. Steinmetz & Lee Cossell & M. Florencia Iacaruso & Ho Ko & Péter Barthó & Tirin Moore & Sonja B. Hofer & Thomas D. Mrsic-Flogel & Matteo Carandini & Kenneth D. Harris, 2015. "Diverse coupling of neurons to populations in sensory cortex," Nature, Nature, vol. 521(7553), pages 511-515, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jan Humplik & Gašper Tkačik, 2017. "Probabilistic models for neural populations that naturally capture global coupling and criticality," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(9), pages 1-26, September.
    2. Giovanni Diana & Thomas T J Sainsbury & Martin P Meyer, 2019. "Bayesian inference of neuronal assemblies," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(10), pages 1-31, October.
    3. Sravani Kondapavulur & Stefan M. Lemke & David Darevsky & Ling Guo & Preeya Khanna & Karunesh Ganguly, 2022. "Transition from predictable to variable motor cortex and striatal ensemble patterning during behavioral exploration," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-17, December.
    4. Qin, Ying-Mei & Che, Yan-Qiu & Zhao, Jia, 2018. "Effects of degree distributions on signal propagation in noisy feedforward neural networks," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 512(C), pages 763-774.
    5. Yifan Gu & Yang Qi & Pulin Gong, 2019. "Rich-club connectivity, diverse population coupling, and dynamical activity patterns emerging from local cortical circuits," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(4), pages 1-34, April.
    6. Richard F Betzel & Katherine C Wood & Christopher Angeloni & Maria Neimark Geffen & Danielle S Bassett, 2019. "Stability of spontaneous, correlated activity in mouse auditory cortex," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(12), pages 1-25, December.
    7. Rong J. B. Zhu & Xue-Xin Wei, 2023. "Unsupervised approach to decomposing neural tuning variability," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-16, December.
    8. Guillaume Viejo & Thomas Cortier & Adrien Peyrache, 2018. "Brain-state invariant thalamo-cortical coordination revealed by non-linear encoders," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(3), pages 1-25, March.
    9. Volker Pernice & Rava Azeredo da Silveira, 2018. "Interpretation of correlated neural variability from models of feed-forward and recurrent circuits," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(2), pages 1-26, February.
    10. Christian Donner & Klaus Obermayer & Hideaki Shimazaki, 2017. "Approximate Inference for Time-Varying Interactions and Macroscopic Dynamics of Neural Populations," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(1), pages 1-27, January.
    11. Itamar Daniel Landau & Haim Sompolinsky, 2018. "Coherent chaos in a recurrent neural network with structured connectivity," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(12), pages 1-27, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1005452. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ploscompbiol (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.