IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pcbi00/1005292.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Inferential Structure Determination of Chromosomes from Single-Cell Hi-C Data

Author

Listed:
  • Simeon Carstens
  • Michael Nilges
  • Michael Habeck

Abstract

Chromosome conformation capture (3C) techniques have revealed many fascinating insights into the spatial organization of genomes. 3C methods typically provide information about chromosomal contacts in a large population of cells, which makes it difficult to draw conclusions about the three-dimensional organization of genomes in individual cells. Recently it became possible to study single cells with Hi-C, a genome-wide 3C variant, demonstrating a high cell-to-cell variability of genome organization. In principle, restraint-based modeling should allow us to infer the 3D structure of chromosomes from single-cell contact data, but suffers from the sparsity and low resolution of chromosomal contacts. To address these challenges, we adapt the Bayesian Inferential Structure Determination (ISD) framework, originally developed for NMR structure determination of proteins, to infer statistical ensembles of chromosome structures from single-cell data. Using ISD, we are able to compute structural error bars and estimate model parameters, thereby eliminating potential bias imposed by ad hoc parameter choices. We apply and compare different models for representing the chromatin fiber and for incorporating singe-cell contact information. Finally, we extend our approach to the analysis of diploid chromosome data.Author Summary: Spatial interactions between distant genomic regions are of fundamental importance in gene regulation and other nuclear processes. Recent chromatin crosslinking (“Hi-C”) experiments probe the spatial organization of chromosomes on a genome-wide scale to an extent that was previously unattainable. These experiments report on contacting loci and thus provide information about the three-dimensional structure of the genome. Unfortunately, the data are noisy and do not determine the structure uniquely. There is also little quantitative prior knowledge about the large-scale organization of chromosomes. Here, we address these challenges by developing a Bayesian statistical approach that combines a minimalist polymer model with chromosome size measurements and conformation capture data. Our method generates statistical ensembles of chromosome structures from extremely sparse single-cell Hi-C data. We remove potential bias by learning modeling parameters from the experimental data and apply model comparison techniques to investigate which among a set of alternative models is most supported by the Hi-C data. Our method also allows for modeling with ambiguous contact data obtained on polyploid chromosomes, which is an important step towards three-dimensional modeling of whole genomes.

Suggested Citation

  • Simeon Carstens & Michael Nilges & Michael Habeck, 2016. "Inferential Structure Determination of Chromosomes from Single-Cell Hi-C Data," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(12), pages 1-33, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1005292
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005292
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005292
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005292&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005292?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jesse R. Dixon & Siddarth Selvaraj & Feng Yue & Audrey Kim & Yan Li & Yin Shen & Ming Hu & Jun S. Liu & Bing Ren, 2012. "Topological domains in mammalian genomes identified by analysis of chromatin interactions," Nature, Nature, vol. 485(7398), pages 376-380, May.
    2. Daniel Russel & Keren Lasker & Ben Webb & Javier Velázquez-Muriel & Elina Tjioe & Dina Schneidman-Duhovny & Bret Peterson & Andrej Sali, 2012. "Putting the Pieces Together: Integrative Modeling Platform Software for Structure Determination of Macromolecular Assemblies," PLOS Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(1), pages 1-5, January.
    3. Jonas Paulsen & Odin Gramstad & Philippe Collas, 2015. "Manifold Based Optimization for Single-Cell 3D Genome Reconstruction," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(8), pages 1-19, August.
    4. Zhijun Duan & Mirela Andronescu & Kevin Schutz & Sean McIlwain & Yoo Jung Kim & Choli Lee & Jay Shendure & Stanley Fields & C. Anthony Blau & William S. Noble, 2010. "A three-dimensional model of the yeast genome," Nature, Nature, vol. 465(7296), pages 363-367, May.
    5. Elphège P. Nora & Bryan R. Lajoie & Edda G. Schulz & Luca Giorgetti & Ikuhiro Okamoto & Nicolas Servant & Tristan Piolot & Nynke L. van Berkum & Johannes Meisig & John Sedat & Joost Gribnau & Emmanuel, 2012. "Spatial partitioning of the regulatory landscape of the X-inactivation centre," Nature, Nature, vol. 485(7398), pages 381-385, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hao Wang & Jiaxin Yang & Yu Zhang & Jianliang Qian & Jianrong Wang, 2022. "Reconstruct high-resolution 3D genome structures for diverse cell-types using FLAMINGO," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-18, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alon Diament & Tamir Tuller, 2015. "Improving 3D Genome Reconstructions Using Orthologous and Functional Constraints," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(5), pages 1-22, May.
    2. Surya K Ghosh & Daniel Jost, 2018. "How epigenome drives chromatin folding and dynamics, insights from efficient coarse-grained models of chromosomes," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(5), pages 1-26, May.
    3. Ofir Shukron & David Holcman, 2017. "Transient chromatin properties revealed by polymer models and stochastic simulations constructed from Chromosomal Capture data," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(4), pages 1-20, April.
    4. Vinícius G. Contessoto & Olga Dudchenko & Erez Lieberman Aiden & Peter G. Wolynes & José N. Onuchic & Michele Pierro, 2023. "Interphase chromosomes of the Aedes aegypti mosquito are liquid crystalline and can sense mechanical cues," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-12, December.
    5. Da Lin & Weize Xu & Ping Hong & Chengchao Wu & Zhihui Zhang & Siheng Zhang & Lingyu Xing & Bing Yang & Wei Zhou & Qin Xiao & Jinyue Wang & Cong Wang & Yu He & Xi Chen & Xiaojian Cao & Jiangwei Man & A, 2022. "Decoding the spatial chromatin organization and dynamic epigenetic landscapes of macrophage cells during differentiation and immune activation," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-19, December.
    6. Khalid H. Bhat & Saurabh Priyadarshi & Sarah Naiyer & Xinyan Qu & Hammad Farooq & Eden Kleiman & Jeffery Xu & Xue Lei & Jose F. Cantillo & Robert Wuerffel & Nicole Baumgarth & Jie Liang & Ann J. Feene, 2023. "An Igh distal enhancer modulates antigen receptor diversity by determining locus conformation," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-18, December.
    7. Seungsoo Hahn & Dongsup Kim, 2015. "Identifying and Reducing Systematic Errors in Chromosome Conformation Capture Data," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(12), pages 1-17, December.
    8. Zhang Qi & Xu Zheng & Lai Yutong, 2021. "An Empirical Bayes approach for the identification of long-range chromosomal interaction from Hi-C data," Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology, De Gruyter, vol. 20(1), pages 1-15, February.
    9. Julia Minderjahn & Alexander Fischer & Konstantin Maier & Karina Mendes & Margit Nuetzel & Johanna Raithel & Hanna Stanewsky & Ute Ackermann & Robert Månsson & Claudia Gebhard & Michael Rehli, 2022. "Postmitotic differentiation of human monocytes requires cohesin-structured chromatin," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-19, December.
    10. Wu Zuo & Guangming Chen & Zhimei Gao & Shuai Li & Yanyan Chen & Chenhui Huang & Juan Chen & Zhengjun Chen & Ming Lei & Qian Bian, 2021. "Stage-resolved Hi-C analyses reveal meiotic chromosome organizational features influencing homolog alignment," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 12(1), pages 1-20, December.
    11. Li-Hsin Chang & Sourav Ghosh & Andrea Papale & Jennifer M. Luppino & Mélanie Miranda & Vincent Piras & Jéril Degrouard & Joanne Edouard & Mallory Poncelet & Nathan Lecouvreur & Sébastien Bloyer & Amél, 2023. "Multi-feature clustering of CTCF binding creates robustness for loop extrusion blocking and Topologically Associating Domain boundaries," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-19, December.
    12. Zhaohui Qin & Ben Li & Karen N. Conneely & Hao Wu & Ming Hu & Deepak Ayyala & Yongseok Park & Victor X. Jin & Fangyuan Zhang & Han Zhang & Li Li & Shili Lin, 2016. "Statistical Challenges in Analyzing Methylation and Long-Range Chromosomal Interaction Data," Statistics in Biosciences, Springer;International Chinese Statistical Association, vol. 8(2), pages 284-309, October.
    13. Jia-Yong Zhong & Longjian Niu & Zhuo-Bin Lin & Xin Bai & Ying Chen & Feng Luo & Chunhui Hou & Chuan-Le Xiao, 2023. "High-throughput Pore-C reveals the single-allele topology and cell type-specificity of 3D genome folding," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-18, December.
    14. Zhen Wah Tan & Enrico Guarnera & Igor N Berezovsky, 2018. "Exploring chromatin hierarchical organization via Markov State Modelling," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(12), pages 1-35, December.
    15. Lina Zheng & Wei Wang, 2022. "Regulation associated modules reflect 3D genome modularity associated with chromatin activity," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-11, December.
    16. Guang Shi & D. Thirumalai, 2023. "A maximum-entropy model to predict 3D structural ensembles of chromatin from pairwise distances with applications to interphase chromosomes and structural variants," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-14, December.
    17. Christopher Chase Bolt & Lucille Lopez-Delisle & Aurélie Hintermann & Bénédicte Mascrez & Antonella Rauseo & Guillaume Andrey & Denis Duboule, 2022. "Context-dependent enhancer function revealed by targeted inter-TAD relocation," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-15, December.
    18. Ramya Raviram & Pedro P Rocha & Christian L Müller & Emily R Miraldi & Sana Badri & Yi Fu & Emily Swanzey & Charlotte Proudhon & Valentina Snetkova & Richard Bonneau & Jane A Skok, 2016. "4C-ker: A Method to Reproducibly Identify Genome-Wide Interactions Captured by 4C-Seq Experiments," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(3), pages 1-23, March.
    19. Tomas Zelenka & Antonios Klonizakis & Despina Tsoukatou & Dionysios-Alexandros Papamatheakis & Sören Franzenburg & Petros Tzerpos & Ioannis-Rafail Tzonevrakis & George Papadogkonas & Manouela Kapsetak, 2022. "The 3D enhancer network of the developing T cell genome is shaped by SATB1," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-22, December.
    20. Dunming Hua & Ming Gu & Xiao Zhang & Yanyi Du & Hangcheng Xie & Li Qi & Xiangjun Du & Zhidong Bai & Xiaopeng Zhu & Dechao Tian, 2024. "DiffDomain enables identification of structurally reorganized topologically associating domains," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-14, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1005292. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ploscompbiol (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.