IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pcbi00/1004726.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Inferring Contacting Residues within and between Proteins: What Do the Probabilities Mean?

Author

Listed:
  • Erik van Nimwegen

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Erik van Nimwegen, 2016. "Inferring Contacting Residues within and between Proteins: What Do the Probabilities Mean?," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(5), pages 1-10, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1004726
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004726
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004726
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004726&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004726?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Christoph Feinauer & Marcin J Skwark & Andrea Pagnani & Erik Aurell, 2014. "Improving Contact Prediction along Three Dimensions," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(10), pages 1-13, October.
    2. Michael Socolich & Steve W. Lockless & William P. Russ & Heather Lee & Kevin H. Gardner & Rama Ranganathan, 2005. "Evolutionary information for specifying a protein fold," Nature, Nature, vol. 437(7058), pages 512-518, September.
    3. Lukas Burger & Erik van Nimwegen, 2010. "Disentangling Direct from Indirect Co-Evolution of Residues in Protein Alignments," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(1), pages 1-18, January.
    4. Erik Aurell, 2016. "The Maximum Entropy Fallacy Redux?," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(5), pages 1-7, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Erik Aurell, 2016. "The Maximum Entropy Fallacy Redux?," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(5), pages 1-7, May.
    2. Sophia S Liu & Adam J Hockenberry & Andrea Lancichinetti & Michael C Jewett & Luís A N Amaral, 2016. "NullSeq: A Tool for Generating Random Coding Sequences with Desired Amino Acid and GC Contents," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(11), pages 1-12, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Pedro L Teixeira & Jeff L Mendenhall & Sten Heinze & Brian Weiner & Marcin J Skwark & Jens Meiler, 2017. "Membrane protein contact and structure prediction using co-evolution in conjunction with machine learning," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(5), pages 1-24, May.
    2. Hugo Jacquin & Amy Gilson & Eugene Shakhnovich & Simona Cocco & Rémi Monasson, 2016. "Benchmarking Inverse Statistical Approaches for Protein Structure and Design with Exactly Solvable Models," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(5), pages 1-18, May.
    3. Elena Facco & Andrea Pagnani & Elena Tea Russo & Alessandro Laio, 2019. "The intrinsic dimension of protein sequence evolution," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(4), pages 1-16, April.
    4. Andrea Procaccini & Bryan Lunt & Hendrik Szurmant & Terence Hwa & Martin Weigt, 2011. "Dissecting the Specificity of Protein-Protein Interaction in Bacterial Two-Component Signaling: Orphans and Crosstalks," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(5), pages 1-9, May.
    5. Yasser Roudi & Sheila Nirenberg & Peter E Latham, 2009. "Pairwise Maximum Entropy Models for Studying Large Biological Systems: When They Can Work and When They Can't," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 5(5), pages 1-18, May.
    6. Susann Vorberg & Stefan Seemayer & Johannes Söding, 2018. "Synthetic protein alignments by CCMgen quantify noise in residue-residue contact prediction," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(11), pages 1-25, November.
    7. Shou-Wen Wang & Anne-Florence Bitbol & Ned S Wingreen, 2019. "Revealing evolutionary constraints on proteins through sequence analysis," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(4), pages 1-16, April.
    8. Simona Cocco & Remi Monasson & Martin Weigt, 2013. "From Principal Component to Direct Coupling Analysis of Coevolution in Proteins: Low-Eigenvalue Modes are Needed for Structure Prediction," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(8), pages 1-17, August.
    9. Saeed Omidi & Mihaela Zavolan & Mikhail Pachkov & Jeremie Breda & Severin Berger & Erik van Nimwegen, 2017. "Automated incorporation of pairwise dependency in transcription factor binding site prediction using dinucleotide weight tensors," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(7), pages 1-22, July.
    10. Carlo Baldassi & Marco Zamparo & Christoph Feinauer & Andrea Procaccini & Riccardo Zecchina & Martin Weigt & Andrea Pagnani, 2014. "Fast and Accurate Multivariate Gaussian Modeling of Protein Families: Predicting Residue Contacts and Protein-Interaction Partners," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(3), pages 1-12, March.
    11. Yan Zeng & Wei Wang & Yong Ding & Jilin Zhang & Yongjian Ren & Guangzheng Yi, 2022. "Adaptive Distributed Parallel Training Method for a Deep Learning Model Based on Dynamic Critical Paths of DAG," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(24), pages 1-21, December.
    12. Jennifer L Lahti & Adam P Silverman & Jennifer R Cochran, 2009. "Interrogating and Predicting Tolerated Sequence Diversity in Protein Folds: Application to E. elaterium Trypsin Inhibitor-II Cystine-Knot Miniprotein," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 5(9), pages 1-15, September.
    13. Tatjana Braun & Julia Koehler Leman & Oliver F Lange, 2015. "Combining Evolutionary Information and an Iterative Sampling Strategy for Accurate Protein Structure Prediction," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(12), pages 1-20, December.
    14. Francisco McGee & Sandro Hauri & Quentin Novinger & Slobodan Vucetic & Ronald M. Levy & Vincenzo Carnevale & Allan Haldane, 2021. "The generative capacity of probabilistic protein sequence models," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 12(1), pages 1-14, December.
    15. Lorenzo Asti & Guido Uguzzoni & Paolo Marcatili & Andrea Pagnani, 2016. "Maximum-Entropy Models of Sequenced Immune Repertoires Predict Antigen-Antibody Affinity," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(4), pages 1-20, April.
    16. Marcin J Skwark & Daniele Raimondi & Mirco Michel & Arne Elofsson, 2014. "Improved Contact Predictions Using the Recognition of Protein Like Contact Patterns," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(11), pages 1-14, November.
    17. Xu, Xiu-Lian & Shi, Jin-Xuan & Wang, Jun & Li, Wenfei, 2021. "Long-range correlation and critical fluctuations in coevolution networks of protein sequences," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 562(C).
    18. Shunshi Kohyama & Béla P. Frohn & Leon Babl & Petra Schwille, 2024. "Machine learning-aided design and screening of an emergent protein function in synthetic cells," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-14, December.
    19. Erik Aurell, 2016. "The Maximum Entropy Fallacy Redux?," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(5), pages 1-7, May.
    20. Tiberiu Teşileanu & Lucy J Colwell & Stanislas Leibler, 2015. "Protein Sectors: Statistical Coupling Analysis versus Conservation," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(2), pages 1-20, February.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1004726. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ploscompbiol (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.