IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pcbi00/1006526.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Synthetic protein alignments by CCMgen quantify noise in residue-residue contact prediction

Author

Listed:
  • Susann Vorberg
  • Stefan Seemayer
  • Johannes Söding

Abstract

Compensatory mutations between protein residues in physical contact can manifest themselves as statistical couplings between the corresponding columns in a multiple sequence alignment (MSA) of the protein family. Conversely, large coupling coefficients predict residue contacts. Methods for de-novo protein structure prediction based on this approach are becoming increasingly reliable. Their main limitation is the strong systematic and statistical noise in the estimation of coupling coefficients, which has so far limited their application to very large protein families. While most research has focused on improving predictions by adding external information, little progress has been made to improve the statistical procedure at the core, because our lack of understanding of the sources of noise poses a major obstacle. First, we show theoretically that the expectation value of the coupling score assuming no coupling is proportional to the product of the square roots of the column entropies, and we propose a simple entropy bias correction (EntC) that subtracts out this expectation value. Second, we show that the average product correction (APC) includes the correction of the entropy bias, partly explaining its success. Third, we have developed CCMgen, the first method for simulating protein evolution and generating realistic synthetic MSAs with pairwise statistical residue couplings. Fourth, to learn exact statistical models that reliably reproduce observed alignment statistics, we developed CCMpredPy, an implementation of the persistent contrastive divergence (PCD) method for exact inference. Fifth, we demonstrate how CCMgen and CCMpredPy can facilitate the development of contact prediction methods by analysing the systematic noise contributions from phylogeny and entropy. Using the entropy bias correction, we can disentangle both sources of noise and find that entropy contributes roughly twice as much noise as phylogeny.Author summary: Knowledge about the three-dimensional structure of proteins is key to understanding their function and role in biological processes and diseases. The experimental structure determination techniques, such as X-ray crystallography or electron cryo-microscopy, are labour intensive, time-consuming and expensive. Therefore, complementary computational methods to predict a protein’s structure have become indispensable. Over the last years, immense progress has been made in predicting protein structures from their amino acid sequence by utilizing highly accurate predictions of spatial contacts between amino acid residues as constraints in folding simulations. However, contact prediction methods require large numbers of homologous protein sequences in order to discriminate between signal and noise. A major obstacle preventing progress on the statistical methodology is our limited understanding of the different components of noise that are known to affect the predictions. We provide two tools, CCMpredPy and CCMgen, that can be used to learn highly accurate statistical models for contact prediction and to simulate protein evolution according to the statistical constraints between positions of residues as specified by these models, respectively. We showcase their usefulness by quantifying the relative contribution of noise arising from entropy and phylogeny on the predicted contacts, which will facilitate the improvement of the statistical methodology.

Suggested Citation

  • Susann Vorberg & Stefan Seemayer & Johannes Söding, 2018. "Synthetic protein alignments by CCMgen quantify noise in residue-residue contact prediction," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(11), pages 1-25, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1006526
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006526
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006526
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006526&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006526?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tomasz Kosciolek & David T Jones, 2014. "De Novo Structure Prediction of Globular Proteins Aided by Sequence Variation-Derived Contacts," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(3), pages 1-15, March.
    2. Lukas Burger & Erik van Nimwegen, 2010. "Disentangling Direct from Indirect Co-Evolution of Residues in Protein Alignments," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(1), pages 1-18, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tatjana Braun & Julia Koehler Leman & Oliver F Lange, 2015. "Combining Evolutionary Information and an Iterative Sampling Strategy for Accurate Protein Structure Prediction," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(12), pages 1-20, December.
    2. Andrea Procaccini & Bryan Lunt & Hendrik Szurmant & Terence Hwa & Martin Weigt, 2011. "Dissecting the Specificity of Protein-Protein Interaction in Bacterial Two-Component Signaling: Orphans and Crosstalks," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(5), pages 1-9, May.
    3. Simona Cocco & Remi Monasson & Martin Weigt, 2013. "From Principal Component to Direct Coupling Analysis of Coevolution in Proteins: Low-Eigenvalue Modes are Needed for Structure Prediction," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(8), pages 1-17, August.
    4. Saeed Omidi & Mihaela Zavolan & Mikhail Pachkov & Jeremie Breda & Severin Berger & Erik van Nimwegen, 2017. "Automated incorporation of pairwise dependency in transcription factor binding site prediction using dinucleotide weight tensors," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(7), pages 1-22, July.
    5. Michael Schneider & Oliver Brock, 2014. "Combining Physicochemical and Evolutionary Information for Protein Contact Prediction," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(10), pages 1-15, October.
    6. Carlo Baldassi & Marco Zamparo & Christoph Feinauer & Andrea Procaccini & Riccardo Zecchina & Martin Weigt & Andrea Pagnani, 2014. "Fast and Accurate Multivariate Gaussian Modeling of Protein Families: Predicting Residue Contacts and Protein-Interaction Partners," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(3), pages 1-12, March.
    7. Yan Zeng & Wei Wang & Yong Ding & Jilin Zhang & Yongjian Ren & Guangzheng Yi, 2022. "Adaptive Distributed Parallel Training Method for a Deep Learning Model Based on Dynamic Critical Paths of DAG," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(24), pages 1-21, December.
    8. Erik van Nimwegen, 2016. "Inferring Contacting Residues within and between Proteins: What Do the Probabilities Mean?," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(5), pages 1-10, May.
    9. Hugo Jacquin & Amy Gilson & Eugene Shakhnovich & Simona Cocco & Rémi Monasson, 2016. "Benchmarking Inverse Statistical Approaches for Protein Structure and Design with Exactly Solvable Models," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(5), pages 1-18, May.
    10. Elena Facco & Andrea Pagnani & Elena Tea Russo & Alessandro Laio, 2019. "The intrinsic dimension of protein sequence evolution," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(4), pages 1-16, April.
    11. Marcin J Skwark & Daniele Raimondi & Mirco Michel & Arne Elofsson, 2014. "Improved Contact Predictions Using the Recognition of Protein Like Contact Patterns," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(11), pages 1-14, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1006526. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ploscompbiol (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.