IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pcbi00/1007010.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Revealing evolutionary constraints on proteins through sequence analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Shou-Wen Wang
  • Anne-Florence Bitbol
  • Ned S Wingreen

Abstract

Statistical analysis of alignments of large numbers of protein sequences has revealed “sectors” of collectively coevolving amino acids in several protein families. Here, we show that selection acting on any functional property of a protein, represented by an additive trait, can give rise to such a sector. As an illustration of a selected trait, we consider the elastic energy of an important conformational change within an elastic network model, and we show that selection acting on this energy leads to correlations among residues. For this concrete example and more generally, we demonstrate that the main signature of functional sectors lies in the small-eigenvalue modes of the covariance matrix of the selected sequences. However, secondary signatures of these functional sectors also exist in the extensively-studied large-eigenvalue modes. Our simple, general model leads us to propose a principled method to identify functional sectors, along with the magnitudes of mutational effects, from sequence data. We further demonstrate the robustness of these functional sectors to various forms of selection, and the robustness of our approach to the identification of multiple selected traits.Author summary: Proteins play crucial parts in all cellular processes, and their functions are encoded in their amino-acid sequences. Recently, statistical analyses of protein sequence alignments have demonstrated the existence of “sectors” of collectively correlated amino acids. What is the origin of these sectors? Here, we propose a simple underlying origin of protein sectors: they can arise from selection acting on any collective protein property. We find that the main signature of these functional sectors lies in the low-eigenvalue modes of the covariance matrix of the selected sequences. A better understanding of protein sectors will make it possible to discern collective protein properties directly from sequences, as well as to design new functional sequences, with far-reaching applications in synthetic biology.

Suggested Citation

  • Shou-Wen Wang & Anne-Florence Bitbol & Ned S Wingreen, 2019. "Revealing evolutionary constraints on proteins through sequence analysis," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(4), pages 1-16, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1007010
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007010
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007010
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007010&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007010?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Richard N. McLaughlin Jr & Frank J. Poelwijk & Arjun Raman & Walraj S. Gosal & Rama Ranganathan, 2012. "The spatial architecture of protein function and adaptation," Nature, Nature, vol. 491(7422), pages 138-142, November.
    2. Simona Cocco & Remi Monasson & Martin Weigt, 2013. "From Principal Component to Direct Coupling Analysis of Coevolution in Proteins: Low-Eigenvalue Modes are Needed for Structure Prediction," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(8), pages 1-17, August.
    3. Michael Socolich & Steve W. Lockless & William P. Russ & Heather Lee & Kevin H. Gardner & Rama Ranganathan, 2005. "Evolutionary information for specifying a protein fold," Nature, Nature, vol. 437(7058), pages 512-518, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tiberiu Teşileanu & Lucy J Colwell & Stanislas Leibler, 2015. "Protein Sectors: Statistical Coupling Analysis versus Conservation," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(2), pages 1-20, February.
    2. Alistair Bailey & Andy van Hateren & Tim Elliott & Jörn M Werner, 2014. "Two Polymorphisms Facilitate Differences in Plasticity between Two Chicken Major Histocompatibility Complex Class I Proteins," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(2), pages 1-11, February.
    3. Yasser Roudi & Sheila Nirenberg & Peter E Latham, 2009. "Pairwise Maximum Entropy Models for Studying Large Biological Systems: When They Can Work and When They Can't," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 5(5), pages 1-18, May.
    4. Ahmed Abdul Quadeer & David Morales-Jimenez & Matthew R McKay, 2018. "Co-evolution networks of HIV/HCV are modular with direct association to structure and function," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(9), pages 1-29, September.
    5. Khaled Daqrouq & Rami Alhmouz & Ahmed Balamesh & Adnan Memic, 2015. "Application of Wavelet Transform for PDZ Domain Classification," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(4), pages 1-16, April.
    6. Erik van Nimwegen, 2016. "Inferring Contacting Residues within and between Proteins: What Do the Probabilities Mean?," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(5), pages 1-10, May.
    7. Hugo Jacquin & Amy Gilson & Eugene Shakhnovich & Simona Cocco & Rémi Monasson, 2016. "Benchmarking Inverse Statistical Approaches for Protein Structure and Design with Exactly Solvable Models," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(5), pages 1-18, May.
    8. Emily K. Makowski & Patrick C. Kinnunen & Jie Huang & Lina Wu & Matthew D. Smith & Tiexin Wang & Alec A. Desai & Craig N. Streu & Yulei Zhang & Jennifer M. Zupancic & John S. Schardt & Jennifer J. Lin, 2022. "Co-optimization of therapeutic antibody affinity and specificity using machine learning models that generalize to novel mutational space," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-14, December.
    9. Jennifer L Lahti & Adam P Silverman & Jennifer R Cochran, 2009. "Interrogating and Predicting Tolerated Sequence Diversity in Protein Folds: Application to E. elaterium Trypsin Inhibitor-II Cystine-Knot Miniprotein," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 5(9), pages 1-15, September.
    10. Swetha Garimalla & Thomas Kieber-Emmons & Anastas D Pashov, 2015. "The Patterns of Coevolution in Clade B HIV Envelope's N-Glycosylation Sites," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(6), pages 1-18, June.
    11. Cocco, S. & Monasson, R. & Posani, L. & Rosay, S. & Tubiana, J., 2018. "Statistical physics and representations in real and artificial neural networks," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 504(C), pages 45-76.
    12. Bian Li & Dan M. Roden & John A. Capra, 2022. "The 3D mutational constraint on amino acid sites in the human proteome," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-15, December.
    13. Willow Coyote-Maestas & David Nedrud & Antonio Suma & Yungui He & Kenneth A. Matreyek & Douglas M. Fowler & Vincenzo Carnevale & Chad L. Myers & Daniel Schmidt, 2021. "Probing ion channel functional architecture and domain recombination compatibility by massively parallel domain insertion profiling," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 12(1), pages 1-16, December.
    14. Francisco McGee & Sandro Hauri & Quentin Novinger & Slobodan Vucetic & Ronald M. Levy & Vincenzo Carnevale & Allan Haldane, 2021. "The generative capacity of probabilistic protein sequence models," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 12(1), pages 1-14, December.
    15. Xu, Xiu-Lian & Shi, Jin-Xuan & Wang, Jun & Li, Wenfei, 2021. "Long-range correlation and critical fluctuations in coevolution networks of protein sequences," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 562(C).
    16. Shunshi Kohyama & Béla P. Frohn & Leon Babl & Petra Schwille, 2024. "Machine learning-aided design and screening of an emergent protein function in synthetic cells," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-14, December.
    17. Christoph Feinauer & Marcin J Skwark & Andrea Pagnani & Erik Aurell, 2014. "Improving Contact Prediction along Three Dimensions," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(10), pages 1-13, October.
    18. Umberto Lupo & Damiano Sgarbossa & Anne-Florence Bitbol, 2022. "Protein language models trained on multiple sequence alignments learn phylogenetic relationships," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-11, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1007010. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ploscompbiol (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.