IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pcbi00/1002961.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Multi-scale Inference of Interaction Rules in Animal Groups Using Bayesian Model Selection

Author

Listed:
  • Richard P Mann
  • Andrea Perna
  • Daniel Strömbom
  • Roman Garnett
  • James E Herbert-Read
  • David J T Sumpter
  • Ashley J W Ward

Abstract

Inference of interaction rules of animals moving in groups usually relies on an analysis of large scale system behaviour. Models are tuned through repeated simulation until they match the observed behaviour. More recent work has used the fine scale motions of animals to validate and fit the rules of interaction of animals in groups. Here, we use a Bayesian methodology to compare a variety of models to the collective motion of glass prawns (Paratya australiensis). We show that these exhibit a stereotypical ‘phase transition’, whereby an increase in density leads to the onset of collective motion in one direction. We fit models to this data, which range from: a mean-field model where all prawns interact globally; to a spatial Markovian model where prawns are self-propelled particles influenced only by the current positions and directions of their neighbours; up to non-Markovian models where prawns have ‘memory’ of previous interactions, integrating their experiences over time when deciding to change behaviour. We show that the mean-field model fits the large scale behaviour of the system, but does not capture the observed locality of interactions. Traditional self-propelled particle models fail to capture the fine scale dynamics of the system. The most sophisticated model, the non-Markovian model, provides a good match to the data at both the fine scale and in terms of reproducing global dynamics, while maintaining a biologically plausible perceptual range. We conclude that prawns’ movements are influenced by not just the current direction of nearby conspecifics, but also those encountered in the recent past. Given the simplicity of prawns as a study system our research suggests that self-propelled particle models of collective motion should, if they are to be realistic at multiple biological scales, include memory of previous interactions and other non-Markovian effects.Author Summary: The collective movement of animals in a group is an impressive phenomenon whereby large scale spatio-temporal patterns emerge from simple interactions between individuals. Theoretically, much of our understanding of animal group motion comes from models inspired by statistical physics. In these models, animals are treated as moving (self-propelled) particles that interact with each other according to simple rules. Recently, researchers have shown greater interest in using experimental data to verify which rules are actually implemented by a particular animal species. In our study, we present a rigorous selection between alternative models inspired by the literature for a system of glass prawns. We find that the classic theoretical models do not accurately predict either the fine scale or large scale behaviour of the system. Instead, individual animals appear to be interacting even when completely separated from each other. To resolve this we introduce a new class of models wherein prawns ‘remember‚ their previous interactions, integrating their experiences over time when deciding to change behaviour. These show that the fine scale and large scale behaviour of the prawns is consistent with interactions only between individuals who are close together.

Suggested Citation

  • Richard P Mann & Andrea Perna & Daniel Strömbom & Roman Garnett & James E Herbert-Read & David J T Sumpter & Ashley J W Ward, 2013. "Multi-scale Inference of Interaction Rules in Animal Groups Using Bayesian Model Selection," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(3), pages 1-13, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1002961
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002961
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002961
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002961&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002961?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Richard P Mann, 2011. "Bayesian Inference for Identifying Interaction Rules in Moving Animal Groups," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(8), pages 1-10, August.
    2. Will D Penny & Klaas E Stephan & Jean Daunizeau & Maria J Rosa & Karl J Friston & Thomas M Schofield & Alex P Leff, 2010. "Comparing Families of Dynamic Causal Models," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(3), pages 1-14, March.
    3. Anders Eriksson & Martin Nilsson Jacobi & Johan Nyström & Kolbjørn Tunstrøm, 2010. "Determining interaction rules in animal swarms," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 21(5), pages 1106-1111.
    4. Richard P Mann & Andrea Perna & Daniel Strömbom & Roman Garnett & James E Herbert-Read & David J T Sumpter & Ashley J W Ward, 2012. "Multi-scale Inference of Interaction Rules in Animal Groups Using Bayesian Model Selection," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(1), pages 1-12, January.
    5. Becco, Ch. & Vandewalle, N. & Delcourt, J. & Poncin, P., 2006. "Experimental evidences of a structural and dynamical transition in fish school," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 367(C), pages 487-493.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Julian C Evans & Colin J Torney & Stephen C Votier & Sasha R X Dall, 2019. "Social information use and collective foraging in a pursuit diving seabird," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(9), pages 1-15, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Richard P Mann & Andrea Perna & Daniel Strömbom & Roman Garnett & James E Herbert-Read & David J T Sumpter & Ashley J W Ward, 2012. "Multi-scale Inference of Interaction Rules in Animal Groups Using Bayesian Model Selection," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(1), pages 1-12, January.
    2. Dimitrije Marković & Jan Gläscher & Peter Bossaerts & John O’Doherty & Stefan J Kiebel, 2015. "Modeling the Evolution of Beliefs Using an Attentional Focus Mechanism," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(10), pages 1-34, October.
    3. James C. Russell & Ephraim M. Hanks & Murali Haran, 2016. "Dynamic Models of Animal Movement with Spatial Point Process Interactions," Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics, Springer;The International Biometric Society;American Statistical Association, vol. 21(1), pages 22-40, March.
    4. Moe Okayasu & Tensei Inukai & Daiki Tanaka & Kaho Tsumura & Reiko Shintaki & Masaki Takeda & Kiyoshi Nakahara & Koji Jimura, 2023. "The Stroop effect involves an excitatory–inhibitory fronto-cerebellar loop," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-18, December.
    5. Patrick L. McDermott & Christopher K. Wikle & Joshua Millspaugh, 2017. "Hierarchical Nonlinear Spatio-temporal Agent-Based Models for Collective Animal Movement," Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics, Springer;The International Biometric Society;American Statistical Association, vol. 22(3), pages 294-312, September.
    6. Andreea O Diaconescu & Christoph Mathys & Lilian A E Weber & Jean Daunizeau & Lars Kasper & Ekaterina I Lomakina & Ernst Fehr & Klaas E Stephan, 2014. "Inferring on the Intentions of Others by Hierarchical Bayesian Learning," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(9), pages 1-19, September.
    7. Falk Lieder & Klaas E Stephan & Jean Daunizeau & Marta I Garrido & Karl J Friston, 2013. "A Neurocomputational Model of the Mismatch Negativity," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(11), pages 1-14, November.
    8. Zhao, Yongxiang & Lu, Tuantuan & Su, Wenliang & Wu, Peng & Fu, Libi & Li, Meifang, 2019. "Quantitative measurement of social repulsive force in pedestrian movements based on physiological responses," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 1-20.
    9. Ahmed A Moustafa & Jony Sheynin & Catherine E Myers, 2015. "The Role of Informative and Ambiguous Feedback in Avoidance Behavior: Empirical and Computational Findings," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(12), pages 1-21, December.
    10. Sánchez, R. & Díaz-Leyva, P., 2018. "Self-assembly and speed distributions of active granular particles," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 499(C), pages 11-19.
    11. Šćepanović, J.R. & Karač, A. & Jakšić, Z.M. & Budinski-Petković, Lj. & Vrhovac, S.B., 2019. "Group chase and escape in the presence of obstacles," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 525(C), pages 450-465.
    12. Sam Gijsen & Miro Grundei & Robert T Lange & Dirk Ostwald & Felix Blankenburg, 2021. "Neural surprise in somatosensory Bayesian learning," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(2), pages 1-36, February.
    13. repec:dau:papers:123456789/9572 is not listed on IDEAS
    14. Giovanni Leone & Charlotte Postel & Alison Mary & Florence Fraisse & Thomas Vallée & Fausto Viader & Vincent Sayette & Denis Peschanski & Jaques Dayan & Francis Eustache & Pierre Gagnepain, 2022. "Altered predictive control during memory suppression in PTSD," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-16, December.
    15. Amir Dezfouli & Bernard W Balleine, 2013. "Actions, Action Sequences and Habits: Evidence That Goal-Directed and Habitual Action Control Are Hierarchically Organized," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(12), pages 1-14, December.
    16. James C. Russell & Ephraim M. Hanks & Andreas P. Modlmeier & David P. Hughes, 2017. "Modeling Collective Animal Movement Through Interactions in Behavioral States," Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics, Springer;The International Biometric Society;American Statistical Association, vol. 22(3), pages 313-334, September.
    17. Jean Daunizeau & Kerstin Preuschoff & Karl Friston & Klaas Stephan, 2011. "Optimizing Experimental Design for Comparing Models of Brain Function," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(11), pages 1-18, November.
    18. Blanchet, Adrien & Degond, Pierre, 2017. "Kinetic models for topological nearest-neighbor interactions," IAST Working Papers 17-65, Institute for Advanced Study in Toulouse (IAST).
    19. Fabien Vinckier & Lionel Rigoux & Irma T Kurniawan & Chen Hu & Sacha Bourgeois-Gironde & Jean Daunizeau & Mathias Pessiglione, 2019. "Sour grapes and sweet victories: How actions shape preferences," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(1), pages 1-24, January.
    20. Eduardo A Aponte & Dario Schöbi & Klaas E Stephan & Jakob Heinzle, 2017. "The Stochastic Early Reaction, Inhibition, and late Action (SERIA) model for antisaccades," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(8), pages 1-36, August.
    21. Jean Daunizeau & Vincent Adam & Lionel Rigoux, 2014. "VBA: A Probabilistic Treatment of Nonlinear Models for Neurobiological and Behavioural Data," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(1), pages 1-16, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1002961. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ploscompbiol (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.