IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pcbi00/1000199.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Aggregation Propensity of the Human Proteome

Author

Listed:
  • Elodie Monsellier
  • Matteo Ramazzotti
  • Niccolò Taddei
  • Fabrizio Chiti

Abstract

Formation of amyloid-like fibrils is involved in numerous human protein deposition diseases, but is also an intrinsic property of polypeptide chains in general. Progress achieved recently now allows the aggregation propensity of proteins to be analyzed over large scales. In this work we used a previously developed predictive algorithm to analyze the propensity of the 34,180 protein sequences of the human proteome to form amyloid-like fibrils. We show that long proteins have, on average, less intense aggregation peaks than short ones. Human proteins involved in protein deposition diseases do not differ extensively from the rest of the proteome, further demonstrating the generality of protein aggregation. We were also able to reproduce some of the results obtained with other algorithms, demonstrating that they do not depend on the type of computational tool employed. For example, proteins with different subcellular localizations were found to have different aggregation propensities, in relation to the various efficiencies of quality control mechanisms. Membrane proteins, intrinsically disordered proteins, and folded proteins were confirmed to have very different aggregation propensities, as a consequence of their different structures and cellular microenvironments. In addition, gatekeeper residues at strategic positions of the sequences were found to protect human proteins from aggregation. The results of these comparative analyses highlight the existence of intimate links between the propensity of proteins to form aggregates with β-structure and their biology. In particular, they emphasize the existence of a negative selection pressure that finely modulates protein sequences in order to adapt their aggregation propensity to their biological context. Author Summary: Amyloid-like fibrils are insoluble proteinaceous fibrillar aggregates with a characteristic structure (the cross-β core) that form and deposit in more than 40 pathological conditions in humans. These include Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease, type II diabetes, and the spongiform encephalopathies. A number of proteins not involved in any disease can also form amyloid-like fibrils in vitro, suggesting that amyloid fibril formation is an intrinsic property of proteins in general. Recent efforts in understanding the physico-chemical grounds of amyloid fibril formation has led to the development of several algorithms, capable of predicting a number of aggregation-related parameters of a protein directly from its amino acid sequence. In order to study the predicted aggregation behavior of the human proteome, we have run one of these algorithms on the 34,180 human protein sequences. Our results demonstrate that molecular evolution has acted on protein sequences to finely modulate their aggregation propensities, depending on different parameters related to their in vivo environment. Together with cellular control mechanisms, this natural selection protects proteins from aggregation during their lifetime.

Suggested Citation

  • Elodie Monsellier & Matteo Ramazzotti & Niccolò Taddei & Fabrizio Chiti, 2008. "Aggregation Propensity of the Human Proteome," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 4(10), pages 1-9, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1000199
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000199
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000199
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000199&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000199?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fabrizio Chiti & Massimo Stefani & Niccolò Taddei & Giampietro Ramponi & Christopher M. Dobson, 2003. "Rationalization of the effects of mutations on peptide andprotein aggregation rates," Nature, Nature, vol. 424(6950), pages 805-808, August.
    2. Dennis J. Selkoe, 2003. "Folding proteins in fatal ways," Nature, Nature, vol. 426(6968), pages 900-904, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Allen W Bryan Jr. & Matthew Menke & Lenore J Cowen & Susan L Lindquist & Bonnie Berger, 2009. "BETASCAN: Probable β-amyloids Identified by Pairwise Probabilistic Analysis," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 5(3), pages 1-11, March.
    2. Carlos Família & Sarah R Dennison & Alexandre Quintas & David A Phoenix, 2015. "Prediction of Peptide and Protein Propensity for Amyloid Formation," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(8), pages 1-16, August.
    3. Taniya Bhardwaj & Kundlik Gadhave & Shivani K. Kapuganti & Prateek Kumar & Zacharias Faidon Brotzakis & Kumar Udit Saumya & Namyashree Nayak & Ankur Kumar & Richa Joshi & Bodhidipra Mukherjee & Aparna, 2023. "Amyloidogenic proteins in the SARS-CoV and SARS-CoV-2 proteomes," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-16, December.
    4. Phillips, J.C., 2016. "Autoantibody recognition mechanisms of p53 epitopes," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 451(C), pages 162-170.
    5. Etienne Maisonneuve & Adrien Ducret & Pierre Khoueiry & Sabrina Lignon & Sonia Longhi & Emmanuel Talla & Sam Dukan, 2009. "Rules Governing Selective Protein Carbonylation," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 4(10), pages 1-12, October.
    6. Phillips, J.C., 2014. "Fractals and self-organized criticality in proteins," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 415(C), pages 440-448.
    7. Mookyung Cheon & Iksoo Chang & Sandipan Mohanty & Leila M Luheshi & Christopher M Dobson & Michele Vendruscolo & Giorgio Favrin, 2007. "Structural Reorganisation and Potential Toxicity of Oligomeric Species Formed during the Assembly of Amyloid Fibrils," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 3(9), pages 1-12, September.
    8. Stefan Auer & Filip Meersman & Christopher M Dobson & Michele Vendruscolo, 2008. "A Generic Mechanism of Emergence of Amyloid Protofilaments from Disordered Oligomeric Aggregates," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 4(11), pages 1-7, November.
    9. Espinoza Ortiz, J.S. & Dias, Cristiano L., 2018. "Cooperative fibril model: Native, amyloid-like fibril and unfolded states of proteins," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 511(C), pages 154-165.
    10. Qi Wang & Joshua L Johnson & Nathalie YR Agar & Jeffrey N Agar, 2008. "Protein Aggregation and Protein Instability Govern Familial Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Patient Survival," PLOS Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(7), pages 1-19, July.
    11. Chyn Liaw & Chun-Wei Tung & Shinn-Ying Ho, 2013. "Prediction and Analysis of Antibody Amyloidogenesis from Sequences," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(1), pages 1-15, January.
    12. Wen-Ting Chu & Ji-Long Zhang & Qing-Chuan Zheng & Lin Chen & Hong-Xing Zhang, 2013. "Insights into the Folding and Unfolding Processes of Wild-Type and Mutated SH3 Domain by Molecular Dynamics and Replica Exchange Molecular Dynamics Simulations," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(5), pages 1-9, May.
    13. Noah S Bieler & Tuomas P J Knowles & Daan Frenkel & Robert Vácha, 2012. "Connecting Macroscopic Observables and Microscopic Assembly Events in Amyloid Formation Using Coarse Grained Simulations," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(10), pages 1-10, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1000199. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ploscompbiol (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.