IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pbio00/3000159.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Microglia exit the CNS in spinal root avulsion

Author

Listed:
  • Lauren A Green
  • Julia C Nebiolo
  • Cody J Smith

Abstract

Microglia are central nervous system (CNS)-resident cells. Their ability to migrate outside of the CNS, however, is not understood. Using time-lapse imaging in an obstetrical brachial plexus injury (OBPI) model, we show that microglia squeeze through the spinal boundary and emigrate to peripheral spinal roots. Although both macrophages and microglia respond, microglia are the debris-clearing cell. Once outside the CNS, microglia re-enter the spinal cord in an altered state. These peripheral nervous system (PNS)-experienced microglia can travel to distal CNS areas from the injury site, including the brain, with debris. This emigration is balanced by two mechanisms—induced emigration via N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor (NMDA) dependence and restriction via contact-dependent cellular repulsion with macrophages. These discoveries open the possibility that microglia can migrate outside of their textbook-defined regions in disease states.Microglia are normally assumed to be confined to the central nervous system (CNS), but this study shows show that after spinal root injury, microglia can exit the CNS to clear debris. Upon re-entry, the emigrated microglia are altered and can travel to distal areas such as the brain.Author summary: Cells are precisely organized in specific anatomical domains to ensure normal functioning of the nervous system. One such cell type, microglia, is usually considered to be confined to the central nervous system (CNS). Using time-lapse imaging to capture microglia as they migrate, we show that their characteristic CNS-residency can be altered after spinal root injury. After such injury, the microglia exit the spinal root to the periphery, where they clear debris at the injury site and then carry that debris back into the CNS. In addition, microglia that leave the CNS after spinal root injury become distinct from those that remain within the CNS. This emigration event of microglia after injury is driven by two mechanisms—dependence on glutamatergic signaling that induces their emigration to the injury and interactions with macrophages that prevent their ectopic exit from the spinal cord. Together, these discoveries raise the possibility that microglia could override their CNS-residency in certain disease contexts.

Suggested Citation

  • Lauren A Green & Julia C Nebiolo & Cody J Smith, 2019. "Microglia exit the CNS in spinal root avulsion," PLOS Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(2), pages 1-30, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pbio00:3000159
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3000159
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article?id=10.1371/journal.pbio.3000159
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pbio.3000159&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000159?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lawrence Fourgeaud & Paqui G. Través & Yusuf Tufail & Humberto Leal-Bailey & Erin D. Lew & Patrick G. Burrola & Perri Callaway & Anna Zagórska & Carla V. Rothlin & Axel Nimmerjahn & Greg Lemke, 2016. "TAM receptors regulate multiple features of microglial physiology," Nature, Nature, vol. 532(7598), pages 240-244, April.
    2. Jiyun Peng & Nan Gu & Lijun Zhou & Ukpong B Eyo & Madhuvika Murugan & Wen-Biao Gan & Long-Jun Wu, 2016. "Microglia and monocytes synergistically promote the transition from acute to chronic pain after nerve injury," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 7(1), pages 1-13, November.
    3. Jeremy N. Kay & Monica W. Chu & Joshua R. Sanes, 2012. "MEGF10 and MEGF11 mediate homotypic interactions required for mosaic spacing of retinal neurons," Nature, Nature, vol. 483(7390), pages 465-469, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Maciej K. Kocylowski & Hande Aypek & Wolfgang Bildl & Martin Helmstädter & Philipp Trachte & Bernhard Dumoulin & Sina Wittösch & Lukas Kühne & Ute Aukschun & Carolin Teetzen & Oliver Kretz & Botond Ga, 2022. "A slit-diaphragm-associated protein network for dynamic control of renal filtration," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-15, December.
    2. Janik Engelmann & Jennifer Zarrer & Victoria Gensch & Kristoffer Riecken & Nikolaus Berenbrok & The Vinh Luu & Antonia Beitzen-Heineke & Maria Elena Vargas-Delgado & Klaus Pantel & Carsten Bokemeyer &, 2022. "Regulation of bone homeostasis by MERTK and TYRO3," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-15, December.
    3. Jongsu Choi & Jin Li & Salma Ferdous & Qingnan Liang & Jeffrey R. Moffitt & Rui Chen, 2023. "Spatial organization of the mouse retina at single cell resolution by MERFISH," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-17, December.
    4. Duy Pham & Xiao Tan & Brad Balderson & Jun Xu & Laura F. Grice & Sohye Yoon & Emily F. Willis & Minh Tran & Pui Yeng Lam & Arti Raghubar & Priyakshi Kalita-de Croft & Sunil Lakhani & Jana Vukovic & Ma, 2023. "Robust mapping of spatiotemporal trajectories and cell–cell interactions in healthy and diseased tissues," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-25, December.
    5. Jiyun Peng & Qian Zou & Min-Jie Chen & Chao-Lin Ma & Bao-Ming Li, 2022. "Motor deficits seen in microglial ablation mice could be due to non-specific damage from high dose diphtheria toxin treatment," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-4, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pbio00:3000159. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosbiology (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.