IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pbio00/0020264.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Amplification of Trial-to-Trial Response Variability by Neurons in Visual Cortex

Author

Listed:
  • Matteo Carandini

Abstract

The visual cortex responds to repeated presentations of the same stimulus with high variability. Because the firing mechanism is remarkably noiseless, the source of this variability is thought to lie in the membrane potential fluctuations that result from summated synaptic input. Here this hypothesis is tested through measurements of membrane potential during visual stimulation. Surprisingly, trial-to-trial variability of membrane potential is found to be low. The ratio of variance to mean is much lower for membrane potential than for firing rate. The high variability of firing rate is explained by the threshold present in the function that converts inputs into firing rates. Given an input with small, constant noise, this function produces a firing rate with a large variance that grows with the mean. This model is validated on responses recorded both intracellularly and extracellularly. In neurons of visual cortex, thus, a simple deterministic mechanism amplifies the low variability of summated synaptic inputs into the large variability of firing rate. The computational advantages provided by this amplification are not known. A simple model accounts for the high variability of firing rates observed in responses of cortical neurons to visual stimuli.

Suggested Citation

  • Matteo Carandini, 2004. "Amplification of Trial-to-Trial Response Variability by Neurons in Visual Cortex," PLOS Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 2(9), pages 1-1, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pbio00:0020264
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0020264
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article?id=10.1371/journal.pbio.0020264
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pbio.0020264&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pbio.0020264?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tal Kenet & Dmitri Bibitchkov & Misha Tsodyks & Amiram Grinvald & Amos Arieli, 2003. "Spontaneously emerging cortical representations of visual attributes," Nature, Nature, vol. 425(6961), pages 954-956, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Medina, José M. & Díaz, José A., 2016. "Extreme reaction times determine fluctuation scaling in human color vision," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 461(C), pages 125-132.
    2. Lin, Lihui, 2021. "Does the procedure matter?," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    3. Joseph A Lombardo & Matthew V Macellaio & Bing Liu & Stephanie E Palmer & Leslie C Osborne, 2018. "State dependence of stimulus-induced variability tuning in macaque MT," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(10), pages 1-28, October.
    4. Sean T Kelly & Jens Kremkow & Jianzhong Jin & Yushi Wang & Qi Wang & Jose-Manuel Alonso & Garrett B Stanley, 2014. "The Role of Thalamic Population Synchrony in the Emergence of Cortical Feature Selectivity," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(1), pages 1-13, January.
    5. Felipe Gerhard & Moritz Deger & Wilson Truccolo, 2017. "On the stability and dynamics of stochastic spiking neuron models: Nonlinear Hawkes process and point process GLMs," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(2), pages 1-31, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bershadskii, A. & Ikegaya, Y., 2011. "Chaotic neuron clock," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 44(4), pages 342-347.
    2. Roberto F Galán, 2008. "On How Network Architecture Determines the Dominant Patterns of Spontaneous Neural Activity," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 3(5), pages 1-10, May.
    3. Adrián Ponce-Alvarez & Biyu J He & Patric Hagmann & Gustavo Deco, 2015. "Task-Driven Activity Reduces the Cortical Activity Space of the Brain: Experiment and Whole-Brain Modeling," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(8), pages 1-26, August.
    4. Dejan Pecevski & Lars Buesing & Wolfgang Maass, 2011. "Probabilistic Inference in General Graphical Models through Sampling in Stochastic Networks of Spiking Neurons," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(12), pages 1-25, December.
    5. Dimitri Yatsenko & Krešimir Josić & Alexander S Ecker & Emmanouil Froudarakis & R James Cotton & Andreas S Tolias, 2015. "Improved Estimation and Interpretation of Correlations in Neural Circuits," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(3), pages 1-28, March.
    6. Lars Buesing & Johannes Bill & Bernhard Nessler & Wolfgang Maass, 2011. "Neural Dynamics as Sampling: A Model for Stochastic Computation in Recurrent Networks of Spiking Neurons," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(11), pages 1-22, November.
    7. Rong J. B. Zhu & Xue-Xin Wei, 2023. "Unsupervised approach to decomposing neural tuning variability," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-16, December.
    8. Stefan Habenschuss & Zeno Jonke & Wolfgang Maass, 2013. "Stochastic Computations in Cortical Microcircuit Models," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(11), pages 1-28, November.
    9. Mite Mijalkov & Joana B Pereira & Giovanni Volpe, 2020. "Delayed correlations improve the reconstruction of the brain connectome," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(2), pages 1-22, February.
    10. Lior Matityahu & Naomi Gilin & Gideon A. Sarpong & Yara Atamna & Lior Tiroshi & Nicolas X. Tritsch & Jeffery R. Wickens & Joshua A. Goldberg, 2023. "Acetylcholine waves and dopamine release in the striatum," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-23, December.
    11. Christian Donner & Klaus Obermayer & Hideaki Shimazaki, 2017. "Approximate Inference for Time-Varying Interactions and Macroscopic Dynamics of Neural Populations," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(1), pages 1-27, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pbio00:0020264. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosbiology (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.