IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pid/journl/v22y1983i4p261-282.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

South-South Co-operation. Trade Relations between Indonesia and South Asia

Author

Listed:
  • K KALIRAJAN

    (Economics and Statistics, National University of Singapore, Singapore.)

Abstract

The paper examines the existing trade links between Indonesia and South Asia and identifies problems constraining the relations between the regions. It also investigates possible areas of trade expansion. The paper concludes that trade relations between Indonesia and South Asia have slowly and steadily grown over time though they are still small in absolu te terms. It also elucidates the future prospects and concludes that Indonesia - South Asia trade may increase in fu ture.

Suggested Citation

  • K Kalirajan, 1983. "South-South Co-operation. Trade Relations between Indonesia and South Asia," The Pakistan Development Review, Pakistan Institute of Development Economics, vol. 22(4), pages 261-282.
    • Handle: RePEc:pid:journl:v:22:y:1983:i:4:p:261-282
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.pide.org.pk/pdf/PDR/1983/Volume4/261-282.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kojima, Kiyoshi, 1964. "The Pattern of International Trade Among Advanced Countries," Hitotsubashi Journal of Economics, Hitotsubashi University, vol. 5(1), pages 16-36, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Koopmann, Georg & Vogel, Lars, 2011. "Globalisierung, Regionalisierung und die Handelspolitik der Europäischen Union," HWWI Policy Papers 58, Hamburg Institute of International Economics (HWWI).
    2. Pradyut Guha & Rangalal Mohapatra, 2016. "Intensity and Pattern of Border Trade in India’s Northeast," Foreign Trade Review, , vol. 51(3), pages 248-265, August.
    3. Tiken Das & Pradyut Guha, 2022. "Indo‐ASEAN Trade Complementarity and Favourability with Transition from Look East to Act East Policy: Evidence from Northeastern States of India," Regional Science Policy & Practice, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 14(2), pages 215-243, April.
    4. Donald R. Davis & David E. Weinstein, 2002. "What Role for Empirics in International Trade?," Aussenwirtschaft, University of St. Gallen, School of Economics and Political Science, Swiss Institute for International Economics and Applied Economics Research, vol. 57(04), pages 441-468, December.
    5. Amita Batra, 2010. "Asian Economic Integration ASEAN+3+1 or ASEAN+1s?," Working Papers id:2734, eSocialSciences.
    6. Prakash Chandra Adhikary & Md. Sirazuddin Biswas, 1991. "Potential Gains to Bangladesh for Imports of Selected Commodities from India and Pakistan: An Analytic Investigation," India Quarterly: A Journal of International Affairs, , vol. 47(4), pages 63-82, July.
    7. Maria Crescimanno & Domenico Farruggia & Antonino Galati & Dario Siggia, 2013. "Intensit? degli scambi agroalimentari tra i Paesi del bacino del Mediterraneo," Economia agro-alimentare, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 15(1), pages 13-35.
    8. Carton, Christine & Slim, Sadri, 2018. "Trade misinvoicing in OECD countries: what can we learn from bilateral trade intensity indices?," MPRA Paper 85703, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    9. repec:kap:iaecre:v:14:y:2008:i:4:p:355-368 is not listed on IDEAS
    10. Sayeeda Bano, 2014. "Trade Relations between New Zealand and China: An Empirical Analysis in the Context of a Free Trade Agreement," Review of Economics & Finance, Better Advances Press, Canada, vol. 4, pages 75-92, November.
    11. Amita Batra, 2006. "Asian Economic Integration: ASEAN+3+1 or ASEAN+1s?," Indian Council for Research on International Economic Relations, New Delhi Working Papers 186, Indian Council for Research on International Economic Relations, New Delhi, India.
    12. Viet HOANG, 2018. "Assessing the agricultural trade complementarity of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations countries," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 64(10), pages 464-475.
    13. repec:mth:ijafr8:v:8:y:2018:i:4:p:22-59 is not listed on IDEAS
    14. de Frutos, Pablo, 2020. "Changes in world patterns of wild edible mushrooms use measured through international trade flows," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    15. Widodo, Tri, 2009. "Modified Grubel-Lloyd Index: Intra-industry Trade and Intra-regional Trade in East Asia," MPRA Paper 77992, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    16. Mary Lovely & Douglas Nelson, 2002. "Intra-industry trade as an indicator of labor market adjustment," Review of World Economics (Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv), Springer;Institut für Weltwirtschaft (Kiel Institute for the World Economy), vol. 138(2), pages 179-206, June.
    17. Setyastuti, Rini & Adiningsih, Sri & Widodo, Tri, 2018. "ASEAN Economic Community: Theoretical versus Practical Economic Integration," MPRA Paper 86919, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    18. Nigel Grimwade & David G. Mayes & Jiao Wang, 2011. "Estimating the Effects of Integration," Chapters, in: Miroslav N. Jovanović (ed.), International Handbook on the Economics of Integration, Volume III, chapter 13, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    19. Sayeeda Bano & Nawal K. Paswan, 2016. "New Zealand–India Trade Relations and Growth Potential: An Empirical Analysis," India Quarterly: A Journal of International Affairs, , vol. 72(1), pages 50-74, March.
    20. Jafarli, Said, 2017. "Moves Towards an Islamic Common Market: Evaluation of the Potentials," MPRA Paper 79179, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 2017.
    21. Assen Slim, 2009. "Can intra-industry trade be measured? The limitations of existing methods in the case of the Czech Republic and the EU [Le commerce intra-branche peut-il être mesuré ? Les limites des méthodes exis," Post-Print hal-01275990, HAL.
    22. Bo Chen & Yao Li, 2014. "Analyzing Bilateral Trade Barriers under Global Trade Context: A Gravity Model Adjusted Trade Intensity Index Approach," Review of Development Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 18(2), pages 326-339, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pid:journl:v:22:y:1983:i:4:p:261-282. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Khurram Iqbal (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/pideipk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.