IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pep/journl/v2y1993i3p189-202.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Valuation of Closely-Held Firms: Another Look

Author

Listed:
  • William P. Dukes

    (Texas Tech University)

  • Oswald D. Bowlin

    (Texas Tech University)

Abstract

For the most part, closely-held firms must be valued using proxies for market data which are not available. Valuation approaches described in the literature are used by practitioners with exceptions demanded by circumstances. Results of the survey confirm statements of others that substantial discounts for non-marketability and minority interest are usually appropriate.

Suggested Citation

  • William P. Dukes & Oswald D. Bowlin, 1993. "Valuation of Closely-Held Firms: Another Look," Journal of Entrepreneurial Finance, Pepperdine University, Graziadio School of Business and Management, vol. 2(3), pages 189-202, Summer.
  • Handle: RePEc:pep:journl:v:2:y:1993:i:3:p:189-202
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://jefsite.org/RePEc/pep/journl/jef-1993-02-3-a-dukes.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gonedes, Nicholas J., 1973. "Evidence on the Information Content of Accounting Numbers: Accounting-based and Market-based Estimates of Systematic Risk," Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 8(3), pages 407-443, June.
    2. Beaver, William & Manegold, James, 1975. "The Association between Market-Determined and Accounting-Determined Measures of Systematic Risk: Some Further Evidence," Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 10(2), pages 231-284, June.
    3. Hill, Ned C. & Stone, Bernell K., 1980. "Accounting Betas, Systematic Operating Risk, and Financial Leverage: A Risk-Composition Approach to the Determinants of Systematic Risk," Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 15(3), pages 595-637, September.
    4. Darryl Waldron & Carl M. Hubbard, 1991. "Valuation Methods and Estimates in Relationship to Investing versus Consulting," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 16(1), pages 43-52, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. J. Sarmiento-Sabogal & M. Sadeghi, 2015. "Estimating the cost of equity for private firms using accounting fundamentals," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 47(3), pages 288-301, January.
    2. Ray Ball & Gil Sadka & Ayung Tseng, 2022. "Using accounting earnings and aggregate economic indicators to estimate firm-level systematic risk," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 27(2), pages 607-646, June.
    3. Gordon V. Karels & William H. Sackley, 1993. "The Relationship Between Market And Accounting Betas For Commercial Banks," Review of Financial Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 2(2), pages 59-72, March.
    4. William P. Dukes, 2001. "Where Do We Stand on Closely-Held Firm Valuation?," Journal of Entrepreneurial Finance, Pepperdine University, Graziadio School of Business and Management, vol. 6(1), pages 129-155, Spring.
    5. Pereiro, Luis E., 2001. "The valuation of closely-held companies in Latin America," Emerging Markets Review, Elsevier, vol. 2(4), pages 330-370, December.
    6. Groh, Alexander P. & Gottschalg, Oliver, 2009. "The opportunity cost of capital of US buyouts," IESE Research Papers D/780, IESE Business School.
    7. A. D. Castagna & Z. P. Matolcsy, 1978. "The Relationship Between Accounting Variables and Systematic Risk and the Prediction of Systematic Risk," Australian Journal of Management, Australian School of Business, vol. 3(2), pages 113-126, October.
    8. Stein, Jeremy C, 1996. "Rational Capital Budgeting in an Irrational World," The Journal of Business, University of Chicago Press, vol. 69(4), pages 429-455, October.
    9. Chiu, She-Chih & Lin, Hsuan-Chu & Chien, Chin-Chen & Liang, Chia-Chen, 2022. "Does Form 20-F reconciliation elimination for IFRS filers affect the risk forecasting ability of accounting numbers?," Journal of Contemporary Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 18(3).
    10. Nicolas Krauss & Ingo Walter, 2009. "Can Microfinance Reduce Portfolio Volatility?," Economic Development and Cultural Change, University of Chicago Press, vol. 58(1), pages 85-110, October.
    11. Borochin, Paul, 2020. "The information content of real operating performance measures from the airline industry," Journal of Financial Markets, Elsevier, vol. 50(C).
    12. Atif Ellahie, 2021. "Earnings beta," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 26(1), pages 81-122, March.
    13. David B. Smith, 1983. "A Framework For Analyzing Nonconvertible Preferred Stock Risk," Journal of Financial Research, Southern Finance Association;Southwestern Finance Association, vol. 6(2), pages 127-139, June.
    14. Sarmiento-Sabogal, Julio & Sadeghi, Mehdi, 2014. "Unlevered betas and the cost of equity capital: An empirical approach," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 30(C), pages 90-105.
    15. Aysha Sami Latif & Attaullah Shah, 2021. "The Impact of Quality of Accounting Information on Cost of Capital: Insight from an Emerging Economy," Asian Economic and Financial Review, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 11(4), pages 292-307, April.
    16. Khadija Younas & Muhammad Sarmad, 2020. "The Impact Of Degree Of Financial Leverage And Degree Of Operating Leverage On The Systematic Risk Of Common Stock," Malaysian E Commerce Journal (MECJ), Zibeline International Publishing, vol. 4(1), pages 24-32, April.
    17. Wang, Cindy S.H. & Fan, Rui & Xie, Yiqiang, 2023. "Market systemic risk, predictability and macroeconomics news," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 56(C).
    18. Michael Basch & Gonzalo García-Huidobro, 1997. "Costo de Capital en Segmentos Industriales: Una Estimación Robusta," Latin American Journal of Economics-formerly Cuadernos de Economía, Instituto de Economía. Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile., vol. 34(102), pages 139-160.
    19. Edward A. Vos, 1992. "Differences in Risk Measurement for Small Unlisted Businesses," Journal of Entrepreneurial Finance, Pepperdine University, Graziadio School of Business and Management, vol. 1(3), pages 255-267, Spring.
    20. Terry S. Walter, 1984. "Australian Takeovers: Capital Market Efficiency and Shareholder Risk and Return," Australian Journal of Management, Australian School of Business, vol. 9(1), pages 63-118, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Valuation; Closely-Held; Small Business;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • G32 - Financial Economics - - Corporate Finance and Governance - - - Financing Policy; Financial Risk and Risk Management; Capital and Ownership Structure; Value of Firms; Goodwill

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pep:journl:v:2:y:1993:i:3:p:189-202. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Craig Everett (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/bapepus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.