IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pal/palcom/v6y2020i1d10.1057_s41599-020-0416-5.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Gene editing and gender-specific medicine: a challenge for dementia research

Author

Listed:
  • Silvia Zullo

    (University of Bologna)

  • Luciana Caenazzo

    (University of Padua)

Abstract

Gender-specific medicine is a clinical discipline that studies the impact of sex and gender on physiology, pathophysiology, and diseases. Human genome modification of somatic cells could be useful for treating or preventing a range of diseases and for improving the safety and efficiency of existing gene therapy techniques currently in use or under development for clinical application. Sex and gender differences have been analysed in the incidence and prevalence of dementia. In fact, epidemiological studies have demonstrated that women are at a higher risk than men for developing dementia or Alzheimer’s disease (AD); however, the reasons for these differences are not completely known, and the debate is still underway. In recent years, in the effort to clarify the risk of developing dementia or AD, increasing attention has been devoted to the differences between men and women in the causes and manifestations of neurological diseases, as well as to their response to treatment and to outcomes. Through a conceptual analysis we will argue that an emphasis on gender-specific medicine in gene-editing research can contribute to the progress of medicine by introducing a relevant value-driven perspective on health and diseases. This is something we will do on the basis of a gender-specific strategy. In fact, focusing on the effect of sex on dementias and in particular AD may be essential in advancing our understanding, treatment and prevention of these disorders, considering that AD and other dementias disproportionately affect women, and it underlined the relevance of empirical data relating to sex differences and emerging sex-specific findings in dementias in order to assess the scientific approach to these diseases for the improvement of quality of life for both women and men. It may be helpful and suitable to consider how the interventions that modify the genome should include sex and gender as a crucially important variable accounting for the differences between men and women in the causes and manifestations of diseases, as well as in the response to treatment and to outcomes. Of course, gene editing cannot remove biological differences, but its potential harmful effects, on one group relative to another, can be prevented with a research strategy that properly takes them into account with a view to equity between genders.

Suggested Citation

  • Silvia Zullo & Luciana Caenazzo, 2020. "Gene editing and gender-specific medicine: a challenge for dementia research," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 6(1), pages 1-6, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:pal:palcom:v:6:y:2020:i:1:d:10.1057_s41599-020-0416-5
    DOI: 10.1057/s41599-020-0416-5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1057/s41599-020-0416-5
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1057/s41599-020-0416-5?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Short, S.E. & Yang, Y.C. & Jenkins, T.M., 2013. "Sex, gender, genetics, and health," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 103(SUPPL.1), pages 93-101.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Beata Gavurova & Viera Ivankova & Martin Rigelsky & Ladislav Suhanyi, 2020. "Impact of Gender Inequalities in the Causes of Mortality on the Competitiveness of OECD Countries," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(10), pages 1-17, May.
    2. Gabriella Conti & James J. Heckman & Rodrigo Pinto, 2016. "The Effects of Two Influential Early Childhood Interventions on Health and Healthy Behaviour," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 126(596), pages 28-65, October.
    3. Ong, Rachel & Nguyen, Toan & Kendall, Garth, 2018. "The impact of intergenerational financial transfers on health and wellbeing outcomes: A longitudinal study," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 214(C), pages 179-186.
    4. Gabriella Conti & James J. Heckman & Rodrigo Pinto, 2016. "The Effects of Two Influential Early Childhood Interventions on Health and Healthy Behaviour," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 126(596), pages 28-65, October.
    5. Wedow, Robbee & Briley, Daniel A. & Short, Susan E. & Boardman, Jason D., 2016. "Gender and genetic contributions to weight identity among adolescents and young adults in the U.S," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 99-107.
    6. Nicholas Kofi Adjei & Tilman Brand & Hajo Zeeb, 2017. "Gender inequality in self-reported health among the elderly in contemporary welfare countries: A cross-country analysis of time use activities, socioeconomic positions and family characteristics," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(9), pages 1-24, September.
    7. Davidson, Trent & Vinneau-Palarino, Justin & Goode, Joshua A. & Boardman, Jason D., 2021. "Utilizing genome wide data to highlight the social behavioral pathways to health: The case of obesity and cardiovascular health among older adults," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 273(C).
    8. Natasha Prodan‐Bhalla & Annette J. Browne, 2019. "Exploring women's health care experiences through an equity lens: Findings from a community clinic serving marginalised women," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(19-20), pages 3459-3469, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:palcom:v:6:y:2020:i:1:d:10.1057_s41599-020-0416-5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.nature.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.