IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pal/palcom/v12y2025i1d10.1057_s41599-024-03861-1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Elucidating university students’ intentions to seek automated writing feedback from Grammarly: toward perceptual and systemic predictors

Author

Listed:
  • Yupeng Lin

    (Beijing Language and Culture University)

  • Zhonggen Yu

    (Beijing Language and Culture University)

Abstract

Automated writing evaluation has gained popularity in technology-enhanced language education, while learners’ technology acceptance of such tools has yet to be thoroughly investigated. Based on 487 university students’ perceptions, this structural equation modeling study finds that traditional hypotheses in the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) can be extended to explain higher education students’ Grammarly utilization. Students’ performance and effort expectancy significantly predict their behavioral intentions to use Grammarly. Facilitating conditions and behavioral intentions significantly predict actual use behavior. Additionally, students’ peer influence and trust in feedback significantly predict their performance expectancy. Peer influence, systemic interactivity, and personal investment significantly predict their effort expectancy. Students’ willingness for e-learning and instructional support significantly predict facilitating conditions, while peer influence does not. The proposed model yields moderate explanatory power for Grammarly acceptance and use among higher education students (R2 = 19.6%–46.4%). Our findings can enlighten innovative technological designs for automated writing evaluation tools and digitalized foreign language writing instruction.

Suggested Citation

  • Yupeng Lin & Zhonggen Yu, 2025. "Elucidating university students’ intentions to seek automated writing feedback from Grammarly: toward perceptual and systemic predictors," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(1), pages 1-17, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:pal:palcom:v:12:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1057_s41599-024-03861-1
    DOI: 10.1057/s41599-024-03861-1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1057/s41599-024-03861-1
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1057/s41599-024-03861-1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rui Li, 2021. "Modeling the Continuance Intention to Use Automated Writing Evaluation Among Chinese EFL Learners," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(4), pages 21582440211, November.
    2. Chengliang Wang & Xiaojiao Chen & Teng Yu & Yidan Liu & Yuhui Jing, 2024. "Education reform and change driven by digital technology: a bibliometric study from a global perspective," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-17, December.
    3. Ning Fan, 2023. "Exploring the Effects of Automated Written Corrective Feedback on EFL Students’ Writing Quality: A Mixed-Methods Study," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(2), pages 21582440231, June.
    4. Zhonggen Yu & Liheng Yu, 2023. "Examining Factors That Influence Learner Retention in MOOCs During the COVID-19 Pandemic Time," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(2), pages 21582440231, May.
    5. Sheshadri Chatterjee & Kalyan Kumar Bhattacharjee & Chia-Wen Tsai & Amit Kumar Agrawal, 2021. "Impact of peer influence and government support for successful adoption of technology for vocational education: A quantitative study using PLS-SEM technique," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 55(6), pages 2041-2064, December.
    6. Yukun Hou & Zhonggen Yu, 2023. "RETRACTED ARTICLE: The unified theory of acceptance and use of DingTalk for educational purposes in China: an extended structural equation model," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-12, December.
    7. Nees Jan Eck & Ludo Waltman, 2010. "Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 84(2), pages 523-538, August.
    8. Youmei Wang & Xia Luo & Chen-Chen Liu & Yun-Fang Tu & Naini Wang, 2022. "An Integrated Automatic Writing Evaluation and SVVR Approach to Improve Students’ EFL Writing Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-19, September.
    9. Cliff R. Kikawa & Charity Kiconco & Moses Agaba & Dimas Ntirampeba & Amos Ssematimba & Billy M. Kalema, 2022. "Social Media Marketing for Small and Medium Enterprise Performance in Uganda: A Structural Equation Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-20, November.
    10. Jian Mou & Dong-Hee Shin & Jason Cohen, 2017. "Understanding trust and perceived usefulness in the consumer acceptance of an e-service: a longitudinal investigation," Behaviour and Information Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(2), pages 125-139, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lutz Bornmann & Robin Haunschild & Sven E. Hug, 2018. "Visualizing the context of citations referencing papers published by Eugene Garfield: a new type of keyword co-occurrence analysis," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 114(2), pages 427-437, February.
    2. Akinpelu, O.A. & Olaleye, O. & Fagbola, O., . "The Soil Organic Matter Decomposers: A Bibliometric Analysis," International Journal of Agriculture and Environmental Research, Malwa International Journals Publication, vol. 9(4).
    3. Muhammad Farooq Islam & Ozge Can, 2024. "Integrating digital and sustainable entrepreneurship through business models: a bibliometric analysis," Journal of Global Entrepreneurship Research, Springer;UNESCO Chair in Entrepreneurship, vol. 14(1), pages 1-18, December.
    4. Gaviria-Marin, Magaly & Merigó, José M. & Baier-Fuentes, Hugo, 2019. "Knowledge management: A global examination based on bibliometric analysis," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 194-220.
    5. J. Gómez-Verjan & I. Gonzalez-Sanchez & E. Estrella-Parra & R. Reyes-Chilpa, 2015. "Trends in the chemical and pharmacological research on the tropical trees Calophyllum brasiliense and Calophyllum inophyllum, a global context," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 105(2), pages 1019-1030, November.
    6. Luis Araya-Castillo & Felipe Hernández-Perlines & Hugo Moraga & Antonio Ariza-Montes, 2021. "Scientometric Analysis of Research on Socioemotional Wealth," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-26, March.
    7. Loet Leydesdorff & Dieter Franz Kogler & Bowen Yan, 2017. "Mapping patent classifications: portfolio and statistical analysis, and the comparison of strengths and weaknesses," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 112(3), pages 1573-1591, September.
    8. Filippo Corsini & Rafael Laurenti & Franziska Meinherz & Francesco Paolo Appio & Luca Mora, 2019. "The Advent of Practice Theories in Research on Sustainable Consumption: Past, Current and Future Directions of the Field," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-19, January.
    9. Tuba Bircan & Almila Alkim Akdag Salah, 2022. "A Bibliometric Analysis of the Use of Artificial Intelligence Technologies for Social Sciences," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(23), pages 1-17, November.
    10. Kumari, Rajni & Kumar, Manish & Vivekanand, V. & Pareek, Nidhi, 2023. "Chitin biorefinery: A narrative and prophecy of crustacean shell waste sustainable transformation into bioactives and renewable energy," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
    11. Luis Puente-Díaz & Doina Solís & Siu-heng Wong-Toro, 2024. "Comprehensive Bibliometric Analysis on High Hydrostatic Pressure as New Sustainable Technology for Food Processing: Key Concepts and Research Trends," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(1), pages 1-18, December.
    12. Fatih Albayrak & Oğuz Poyrazoğlu, 2024. "A Systematic Literature Review on Lean, Industry 4.0, and Digital Factory," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 15(3), pages 13486-13508, September.
    13. Migliavacca, Milena & Goodell, John W. & Paltrinieri, Andrea, 2023. "A bibliometric review of portfolio diversification literature," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    14. Zhengyao Liu & Jing Huang & Yonghong Li & Xiaokang Liu & Fei Qiang & Yiping He, 2025. "A Bibliometric Analysis of Geological Hazards Monitoring Technologies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(3), pages 1-15, January.
    15. Dilvin Cebi & Melih Soner Celiktas & Hasan Sarptas, 2022. "A Review on Sewage Sludge Valorization via Hydrothermal Carbonization and Applications for Circular Economy," Circular Economy and Sustainability, Springer, vol. 2(4), pages 1345-1367, December.
    16. Muthukumar Perumal & Selvam Sekar & Paula C. S. Carvalho, 2024. "Global Investigations of Seawater Intrusion (SWI) in Coastal Groundwaters in the Last Two Decades (2000–2020): A Bibliometric Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-28, February.
    17. Massimiliano M. Pellegrini & Riccardo Rialti & Giacomo Marzi & Andrea Caputo, 2020. "Sport entrepreneurship: A synthesis of existing literature and future perspectives," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 16(3), pages 795-826, September.
    18. Khayet, Mohamed & Aytaç, Ersin & Essalhi, Mohamed & Cipollina, Andrea & García-Fernández, Loreto & Contreras-Martínez, Jorge & García-Payo, Carmen & Ruiz-García, Alejandro & Figoli, Alberto, 2025. "Elucidating the dynamics of salinity gradient energy research," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 219(C).
    19. David Vérez & Luisa F. Cabeza, 2021. "Which Building Services Are Considered to Have Impact on Climate Change?," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-16, June.
    20. María Pinto & Rosaura Fernández-Pascual & David Caballero-Mariscal & Dora Sales, 2020. "Information literacy trends in higher education (2006–2019): visualizing the emerging field of mobile information literacy," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 124(2), pages 1479-1510, August.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:palcom:v:12:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1057_s41599-024-03861-1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.nature.com/palcomms/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.