IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i18p11586-d916045.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Integrated Automatic Writing Evaluation and SVVR Approach to Improve Students’ EFL Writing Performance

Author

Listed:
  • Youmei Wang

    (Department of Educational Technology, Wenzhou University, Wenzhou 325035, China)

  • Xia Luo

    (Department of Educational Technology, Wenzhou University, Wenzhou 325035, China)

  • Chen-Chen Liu

    (Department of Educational Technology, Wenzhou University, Wenzhou 325035, China)

  • Yun-Fang Tu

    (Department of Library and Information Science, Research and Development Center for Physical Education, Health and Information Technology, Fu Jen Catholic University, New Taipei City 24205, Taiwan)

  • Naini Wang

    (School of Foreign Languages, Wenzhou University of Technology, Wenzhou 325035, China)

Abstract

Writing is a challenging task for English Foreign Language (EFL) instruction. Based on artificial intelligence technology, Automatic Writing Evaluation (AWE) has received considerable attention from the EFL research community in recent years, since it can provide timely and personalized feedback to EFL writing learners. However, researchers have pointed out that while AWE can provide satisfactory feedback on vocabulary use and grammar, it is relatively inadequate at providing efficient feedback on organization, coherence, and content. Spherical Video-based Virtual Reality (SVVR) can provide a highly immersive and in-depth interaction learning environment that makes up for this shortcoming. Authentic experiences help enhance EFL writing learners’ perceptions and understanding of context, and assist students in creating constructive internal connections between their personal experiences and the topic of their writing, thus improving their writing quality. Therefore, the current study proposed an approach which integrated SVVR and AWE to investigate its effects on EFL writing. To investigate the effectiveness of the proposed approach, a quasi-experiment was carried out in a university’s EFL writing course. The experimental group (37 students) used the SVVR–AWE approach, while the control group (39 students) used the conventional approach with AWE. The results showed that the learning method not only considerably enhanced the students’ EFL writing performance, but also raised their motivation, self-efficacy, and sense of presence, as well as reduced their EFL writing anxiety. Furthermore, interviews were performed and a thematic inductive qualitative analysis of the interview data was conducted to investigate the impact of this learning method on students’ learning behaviors and perceptions.

Suggested Citation

  • Youmei Wang & Xia Luo & Chen-Chen Liu & Yun-Fang Tu & Naini Wang, 2022. "An Integrated Automatic Writing Evaluation and SVVR Approach to Improve Students’ EFL Writing Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-19, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:18:p:11586-:d:916045
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/18/11586/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/18/11586/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zhiqiang Wang & Yu Guo & Yan Wang & Yun-Fang Tu & Chenchen Liu, 2021. "Technological Solutions for Sustainable Development: Effects of a Visual Prompt Scaffolding-Based Virtual Reality Approach on EFL Learners’ Reading Comprehension, Learning Attitude, Motivation, and An," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-15, December.
    2. Ming Li & Yuting Chen & Linjie Zhang & Xuemei Wu & Changqin Huang, 2022. "Investigating Learners’ Engagement and Chinese Writing Learning Outcomes with Different Designs of SVVR-Based Activities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-17, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:18:p:11586-:d:916045. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.