IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pal/jintbs/v22y1991i4p711-721.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Incentives and Response Rates to Cross-National Business Surveys: A Logit Model Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • David Jobber

    (University of Bradford Management Centre)

  • Hafiz Mirza

    (University of Bradford Management Centre)

  • Kee H Wee

    (University of Bradford Management Centre)

Abstract

An experiment was designed to assess the effects of an enclosed incentive (bookmark), a promised incentive (offer of free copy of the survey results), the target country and the nationality of the parent company on response from a sample of American and Japanese-owned foreign subsidiaries. Logit model analysis was used to identify main and interaction effects. Both the bookmark and nationality of parent company affected response rates, while the offer of survey results and target country had no effect. No interaction effects were found. The implications for cross-national mail survey research are discussed.© 1991 JIBS. Journal of International Business Studies (1991) 22, 711–721

Suggested Citation

  • David Jobber & Hafiz Mirza & Kee H Wee, 1991. "Incentives and Response Rates to Cross-National Business Surveys: A Logit Model Analysis," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 22(4), pages 711-721, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:pal:jintbs:v:22:y:1991:i:4:p:711-721
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.palgrave-journals.com/jibs/journal/v22/n4/pdf/8490852a.pdf
    File Function: Link to full text PDF
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: http://www.palgrave-journals.com/jibs/journal/v22/n4/full/8490852a.html
    File Function: Link to full text HTML
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Florence Phua, 2006. "Predicting construction firm performance: an empirical assessment of the differential impact between industry- and firm-specific factors," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(3), pages 309-320.
    2. Agnieszka Chidlow & Pervez N. Ghauri, 2014. "What incentives are being used by International Business Researchers in Their Surveys? A Review," William Davidson Institute Working Papers Series wp1086, William Davidson Institute at the University of Michigan.
    3. Chidlow, Agnieszka & Ghauri, Pervez N. & Yeniyurt, Sengun & Cavusgil, S. Tamer, 2015. "Establishing rigor in mail-survey procedures in international business research," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 50(1), pages 26-35.
    4. Trudy Ann Cameron & W. Douglas Shaw & Shannon R. Ragland & Sally Keefe & John M. (Mac) Callaway, 1996. "Using Distance and Zip Code Census Information For Nonresponse Correction In the Analysis of Mail Survey Data," UCLA Economics Working Papers 751, UCLA Department of Economics.
    5. Agnieszka Chidlow & Pervez N. Ghauri, 2011. "Establishing Data Collection Procedures Equivalence in International Business Research," William Davidson Institute Working Papers Series wp1013, William Davidson Institute at the University of Michigan.
    6. Harzing, Anne-Wil, 1997. "Response rates in international mail surveys: Results of a 22-country study," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 6(6), pages 641-665, December.
    7. König Corinna & Sakshaug Joseph W. & Stegmaier Jens & Kohaut Susanne, 2021. "Trends in Establishment Survey Nonresponse Rates and Nonresponse Bias: Evidence from the 2001-2017 IAB Establishment Panel," Journal of Official Statistics, Sciendo, vol. 37(4), pages 931-953, December.
    8. Edmund R Thompson, 2003. "A Grounded Approach to Identifying National Competitive Advantage: A Preliminary Exploration," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 35(4), pages 631-657, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:jintbs:v:22:y:1991:i:4:p:711-721. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.palgrave-journals.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.