IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pal/ijodag/v14y2017i2d10.1057_s41310-016-0017-0.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Do IT matters matter? IT-related key audit matters in Dutch annual reports

Author

Listed:
  • Lineke Sneller

    (Nyenrode Business University)

  • Ries Bode

    (Management in Motion)

  • Arnoud Klerkx

    (Sanoma Learning)

Abstract

After the recent financial crises, regulators have started reform projects for the auditor’s report, the part of a company’s financial statements that presents the auditor’s opinion. One of the reforms is the transition from a standardised auditor’s report without any company-specific information to a report that discloses company-specific information in the so-called key audit matters, significant risks of material misstatement in the company’s financial statements. In this paper, we investigate whether a specific subset of the key audit matters, namely those that are IT-related, can be a useful source of company-specific information. Information on IT is important for stakeholders: research in the past decades has shown that IT can potentially disrupt industries, affect a company’s stock market value, create risks for a company’s continuity, or endanger the integrity of the financial statements. Company-specific information on IT is therefore relevant, but it is also scarce, as there are hardly any mandatory disclosures and companies do not frequently disclose IT-related information voluntarily. IT-related key audit matters could fill a gap in information availability for stakeholders such as investors, auditors and academics. We study the auditor’s reports in the financial statements of the companies list on the main Dutch stock market, the AEX. This Dutch market regulator has been a frontrunner for the implementation of the new auditor’s report: disclosure of key audit matters has been voluntary in 2012, and mandatory since 2013. In the 75 annual reports, we identify 255 key audit matters, 39 of which were IT-related. We find that the IT-related key audit matters already contain useful information for investors. However, both auditors and academics can play a role in further development of the value of key audit matter disclosures. We argue that auditors may need to pay more attention to high-risk areas such as cyber security. We encourage academics to identify and design innovations of the auditor’s report proactively.

Suggested Citation

  • Lineke Sneller & Ries Bode & Arnoud Klerkx, 2017. "Do IT matters matter? IT-related key audit matters in Dutch annual reports," International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 14(2), pages 139-151, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:pal:ijodag:v:14:y:2017:i:2:d:10.1057_s41310-016-0017-0
    DOI: 10.1057/s41310-016-0017-0
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1057/s41310-016-0017-0
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1057/s41310-016-0017-0?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Austen, Lizabeth A. & Eilifsen, Aasmund & Messier Jr., William F., 2004. "Auditor Detected Misstatements and the Effect of Information Technology," Discussion Papers 2004/1, Norwegian School of Economics, Department of Business and Management Science.
    2. Arnold Wright & Sally Wright, 1996. "The Relationship Between Assessments of Internal Control Strength and Error Occurrence, Impact and Cause," Accounting and Business Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(1), pages 58-71.
    3. Mani Subramani & Eric Walden, 2001. "The Impact of E-Commerce Announcements on the Market Value of Firms," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 12(2), pages 135-154, June.
    4. C. Ranganathan & Carol V. Brown, 2006. "ERP Investments and the Market Value of Firms: Toward an Understanding of Influential ERP Project Variables," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 17(2), pages 145-161, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Maximilian Klöckner & Christoph G. Schmidt & Stephan M. Wagner, 2022. "When Blockchain Creates Shareholder Value: Empirical Evidence from International Firm Announcements," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 31(1), pages 46-64, January.
    2. Narcyz Roztocki & Heinz Roland Weistroffer, 2015. "Investments in enterprise integration technology: An event study," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 17(3), pages 659-672, June.
    3. Anitesh Barua & Deepa Mani, 2018. "Reexamining the Market Value of Information Technology Events," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 29(1), pages 225-240, March.
    4. Konchitchki, Yaniv & O'Leary, Daniel E., 2011. "Event study methodologies in information systems research," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 12(2), pages 99-115.
    5. Brian L. Dos Santos & Zhiqiang (Eric) Zheng & Vijay S. Mookerjee & Hongyu Chen, 2012. "Are New IT-Enabled Investment Opportunities Diminishing for Firms?," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 23(2), pages 287-305, June.
    6. Ariel K. H. Lui & Maggie C. M. Lee & Eric W. T. Ngai, 2022. "Impact of artificial intelligence investment on firm value," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 308(1), pages 373-388, January.
    7. Maureen Francis Mascha & Cathleen L. Miller, 2010. "The effects of task complexity and skill on over/under-estimation of internal control," Managerial Auditing Journal, Emerald Group Publishing, vol. 25(8), pages 734-755, September.
    8. Kuo-Chung Chang & Yu-Kai Gao & Shih-Cheng Lee, 2020. "The Effect of Data Theft on a Firm’s Short-Term and Long-Term Market Value," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(5), pages 1-21, May.
    9. Neeraj Mittal & Barrie R. Nault, 2009. "Research Note ---Investments in Information Technology: Indirect Effects and Information Technology Intensity," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 20(1), pages 140-154, March.
    10. Benaroch, Michel & Chernobai, Anna & Goldstein, James, 2012. "An internal control perspective on the market value consequences of IT operational risk events," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 13(4), pages 357-381.
    11. Alina Sorescu & Nooshin L. Warren & Larisa Ertekin, 2017. "Event study methodology in the marketing literature: an overview," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 45(2), pages 186-207, March.
    12. Hung Chan, K. & Mo, Phyllis L. L., 1998. "Ownership effects on audit-detected error characteristics: An empirical study in an emerging economy," The International Journal of Accounting, Elsevier, vol. 33(2), pages 235-261.
    13. Francis Kofi Andoh-Baidoo & Kweku-Muata Osei-Bryson & Kwasi Amoako-Gyampah, 2012. "Effects of firm and IT characteristics on the value of e-commerce initiatives: An inductive theoretical framework," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 14(2), pages 237-259, April.
    14. Gebauer, Judith & Lee, Fei, 2007. "Enterprise System Flexibility and Implementation Strategies-Aligning Theory with Evidence from a Case Study," Working Papers 07-0113, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, College of Business.
    15. Sriram Thirumalai & Kingshuk K. Sinha, 2011. "Product Recalls in the Medical Device Industry: An Empirical Exploration of the Sources and Financial Consequences," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 57(2), pages 376-392, February.
    16. Lin, Winston T. & Chen, Yueh H. & Chou, Chia-Ching, 2021. "Assessing the business values of e-commerce and information technology separately and jointly and their impacts upon US firms' performance as measured by productive efficiency," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 241(C).
    17. Abdolmohammadi, Mohammad J. & Boss, Scott R., 2010. "Factors associated with IT audits by the internal audit function," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 11(3), pages 140-151.
    18. Hansol Lee & Eunkyung Kweon & Minkyun Kim & Sangmi Chai, 2017. "Does Implementation of Big Data Analytics Improve Firms’ Market Value? Investors’ Reaction in Stock Market," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-17, June.
    19. Habib Saragih, Arfah & Ali, Syaiful & Suwardi, Eko & Utomo, Hargo, 2024. "Finding the missing pieces to an optimal corporate tax savings: Information technology governance and internal information quality," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 52(C).
    20. Sanjeev Dewan & Fei Ren, 2007. "Risk and Return of Information Technology Initiatives: Evidence from Electronic Commerce Announcements," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 18(4), pages 370-394, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:ijodag:v:14:y:2017:i:2:d:10.1057_s41310-016-0017-0. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.palgrave.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.