IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

Exploring the Work-Family Policies Mothers Say Would Help After the Birth of a Child

Listed author(s):
  • Jennifer Renda


    (The Australian Institute of Family Studies)

  • Jennifer Baxter

    (The Australian Institute of Family Studies)

Registered author(s):

    Increased rates of employment amongst mothers with young children over recent years has stimulated debate about how governments and employers can support mothers to effectively combine paid work with caring for young children. This paper examines mothers’ perceived usefulness of a range of work-family policies, by considering the extent to which they have said particular policies would have helped them in the period after the birth. The 2005 Parental Leave in Australia Survey (PLAS) is used to analyse the views of mothers of children aged 15 to 29 months. The policy options addressed are: better access to part-time work; family leave options; better breastfeeding facilities at work; and more accessible, affordable or better quality child care. Mothers who returned to full-time work were the most likely to have expressed that these workfamily policies would have helped them. Childcare – especially affordable childcare – stands out as the policy perceived as most useful to mothers, regardless of their paid work status.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:;dn=929853518226582;res=IELBUS
    Download Restriction: no

    Article provided by Bankwest Curtin Economics Centre (BCEC), Curtin Business School in its journal Australian Journal of Labour Economics.

    Volume (Year): 12 (2009)
    Issue (Month): 1 (March)
    Pages: 65-87

    in new window

    Handle: RePEc:ozl:journl:v:12:y:2009:i:1:p:65-87
    Contact details of provider: Postal:
    GPO Box U1987, Perth WA 6845

    Phone: +61 8 9266 1744
    Web page:

    More information through EDIRC

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ozl:journl:v:12:y:2009:i:1:p:65-87. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Alan Duncan)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.