IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

Comparing Disadvantage and Well-Being in Australian Families

Listed author(s):
  • Peter Saunders


    (University of New South Wales)

  • Anna Zhu

    (University of New South Wales)

Registered author(s):

    This paper compares the living standards of family types using a variety of indicators of disadvantage and examines the impact of disadvantage on several dimensions of well-being. The indicators are poverty (defined in income terms), deprivation (defined as an enforced lack of socially perceived necessities) and two dimensions of social exclusion (a lack of opportunity to participate, socially and economically). These indicators are compared across three family types: couples without children; couples with children; and sole parent families, and are then used to differentiate these families according to whether or not that are disadvantaged using each indicator. The subjective well-being of the families differentiated in this way is then compared using a variety of indicators, as a way of identifying the impact of disadvantage and of assessing the validity of the disadvantage indicators themselves. The results show that there are important differences between the extent and forms of disadvantage experienced, with sole parent families being most disadvantaged and experiencing the lowest levels of well-being on most of the indicators.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:;dn=929760353370291;res=IELBUS
    Download Restriction: no

    Article provided by Bankwest Curtin Economics Centre (BCEC), Curtin Business School in its journal Australian Journal of Labour Economics.

    Volume (Year): 12 (2009)
    Issue (Month): 1 (March)
    Pages: 21-39

    in new window

    Handle: RePEc:ozl:journl:v:12:y:2009:i:1:p:21-39
    Contact details of provider: Postal:
    GPO Box U1987, Perth WA 6845

    Phone: +61 8 9266 1744
    Web page:

    More information through EDIRC

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ozl:journl:v:12:y:2009:i:1:p:21-39. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Alan Duncan)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.