IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ovi/oviste/vxxiiy2022i1p583-590.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Helpful or not? A Review about the Role of Social Media in Higher Education Admission Campaigns

Author

Listed:
  • Alexandru Grigoras

    (“Alexandru Ioan Cuza†University of Iasi, Romania)

Abstract

Communication through the social networks in the educational field has been and continues to be a rather under-researched topic. This study is a sinthesis of literature which aims at sheding some light at how higher education institutions use social media during the admission campaigns. Findings shows that strategy regarding the content posted on social is very important and without interesting and captivating content, the presence on social networks is not useful for an institution. Public institutions should understand the market dynamics and technology evolution and try to find and apply new, more effective communication tools.

Suggested Citation

  • Alexandru Grigoras, 2022. "Helpful or not? A Review about the Role of Social Media in Higher Education Admission Campaigns," Ovidius University Annals, Economic Sciences Series, Ovidius University of Constantza, Faculty of Economic Sciences, vol. 0(1), pages 583-590, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:ovi:oviste:v:xxii:y:2022:i:1:p:583-590
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://stec.univ-ovidius.ro/html/anale/RO/2022-2/Section%204/16.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Adam Peruta & Alison B. Shields, 2017. "Social media in higher education: understanding how colleges and universities use Facebook," Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(1), pages 131-143, January.
    2. Efthymios Constantinides & Marc C. Zinck Stagno, 2012. "Higher Education Marketing: A Study on the Impact of Social Media on Study Selection and University Choice," International Journal of Technology and Educational Marketing (IJTEM), IGI Global, vol. 2(1), pages 41-58, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Irina A. Novikova & Polina A. Bychkova & Alexey L. Novikov, 2022. "Attitudes towards Digital Educational Technologies among Russian University Students before and during the COVID-19 Pandemic," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-18, May.
    2. Avneet Kaur & Sujata Khandai & Jones Mathew, 2023. "Mapping the Field of Social Media Engagement: A Literature Review Using Bibliometric Analysis," FIIB Business Review, , vol. 12(4), pages 368-385, December.
    3. Alejandro Quiroz Flores & Farhana Liza & Husam Quteineh & Barbara Czarnecka, 2021. "Variation in the timing of Covid-19 communication across universities in the UK," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(2), pages 1-25, February.
    4. Saphiya Mukhametgaliyeva & Alena Gura & Olesya Dudnik & Anastasiya Khudarova, 2022. "The Use of Social Networks in E-Learning Technologies in the Context of Distance Education," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-12, July.
    5. Li, Lei & Zhang, Jiayang & An, Xun, 2023. "Using social media for efficient brand marketing: An evaluation of Chinese Universities using Bilibili," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    6. Chiara Fantauzzi & Rocco Frondizi & Nathalie Colasanti & Gloria Fiorani, 2019. "Creating Value in the Entrepreneurial University: Marketization and Merchandising Strategies," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-16, October.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    higher education; Romania; social media; literature review;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • M31 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Marketing and Advertising - - - Marketing

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ovi:oviste:v:xxii:y:2022:i:1:p:583-590. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Gheorghiu Gabriela (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/feoviro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.