IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/wbecrv/v30y2016i2p383-411..html

The Role of Regulation on Entry: Evidence from the Italian Provinces

Author

Listed:
  • Francesco Bripi

Abstract

This paper studies the effects of differences in local administrative burdens in Italy in the years 2005–2007 preceding a major reform that sped up firm registration procedures. Combining regulatory data from a survey on Italian provinces before the reform (costs and time to start a business) with industry-level entry rates of limited liability firms, I explore the effects of regulatory barriers on the average of the annual entry rates across industries with different natural propensities to enter the market. The estimates of the cross-sectional analysis show that lengthier and, to some extent, more costly procedures reduced entry in sectors with naturally high entry. A one-day delay in registration procedures reduces the entry rate in highly dynamic sectors by more than 1 percent. These results hold when I include measures of local financial development and of efficiency of bankruptcy procedures.

Suggested Citation

  • Francesco Bripi, 2016. "The Role of Regulation on Entry: Evidence from the Italian Provinces," The World Bank Economic Review, World Bank, vol. 30(2), pages 383-411.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:wbecrv:v:30:y:2016:i:2:p:383-411.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/wber/lhv063
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version below or

    for a different version of it.

    Other versions of this item:

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Guo, Meng & Luo, Danglun & Liu, Chen, 2024. "City civilization, employment creation and talent agglomeration: Empirical evidence from “National Civilized City” policy in China," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    2. Brixiova, Zuzana & Égert, Balázs, 2017. "Entrepreneurship, institutions and skills in low-income countries," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 381-391.
    3. Matteo Bugamelli & Francesca Lotti & Monica Amici & Emanuela Ciapanna & Fabrizio Colonna & Francesco D�Amuri & Silvia Giacomelli & Andrea Linarello & Francesco Manaresi & Giuliana Palumbo & Filippo , 2018. "Productivity growth in Italy: a tale of a slow-motion change," Questioni di Economia e Finanza (Occasional Papers) 422, Bank of Italy, Economic Research and International Relations Area.
    4. Cheng, Hua & Ding, Siying & Liu, Yongzheng, 2024. "The effectiveness of entry deregulation: Novel evidence from removing minimum capital requirements," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
    5. Ramalho,Rita & Saltane,Valentina, 2019. "Does Media Stimulate Reform Efforts ?," Policy Research Working Paper Series 8984, The World Bank.
    6. Dustin Chambers & Colin O’Reilly, 2022. "The economic theory of regulation and inequality," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 193(1), pages 63-78, October.
    7. Monica Amici & Silvia Giacomelli & Francesco Manaresi & Marco Tonello, 2015. "Red tape reduction and firm entry: evidence from an Italian reform," Questioni di Economia e Finanza (Occasional Papers) 285, Bank of Italy, Economic Research and International Relations Area.
    8. Segundo Camino-Mogro & Juan Manuel Dominguez & María Auxiliadora Guzman, 2025. "From lower levels of formality to a formal firm in Ecuador: Short-run evidence," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 45(1), pages 668-677.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • G18 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Government Policy and Regulation
    • G38 - Financial Economics - - Corporate Finance and Governance - - - Government Policy and Regulation
    • L51 - Industrial Organization - - Regulation and Industrial Policy - - - Economics of Regulation
    • M13 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - New Firms; Startups

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:wbecrv:v:30:y:2016:i:2:p:383-411.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/wrldbus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.