IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/rfinst/v34y2021i4p1617-1660..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How Do Consumers Fare When Dealing with Debt Collectors? Evidence from Out-of-Court Settlements
[Why don’t lenders renegotiate more home mortgages? Redefaults, self-cures and securitization]

Author

Listed:
  • Ing-Haw Cheng
  • Felipe Severino
  • Richard R Townsend
  • Stijn Van Nieuwerburgh

Abstract

Do deals with debt collectors alleviate consumer financial distress? Using new data linking court and credit registry records, we examine civil collection lawsuits where consumers can settle out of court. Random assignment of judges with different styles generates exogenous variation in the likelihood of settlement negotiations. We find that settlements increase financial distress relative to going to court, likely by draining consumers of liquidity. The effect is stronger among less financially literate consumers. Survey evidence suggests that consumers generally overestimate how much they would pay through the court system. Perceived nonpecuniary benefits also motivate some consumers to settle.

Suggested Citation

  • Ing-Haw Cheng & Felipe Severino & Richard R Townsend & Stijn Van Nieuwerburgh, 2021. "How Do Consumers Fare When Dealing with Debt Collectors? Evidence from Out-of-Court Settlements [Why don’t lenders renegotiate more home mortgages? Redefaults, self-cures and securitization]," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 34(4), pages 1617-1660.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:rfinst:v:34:y:2021:i:4:p:1617-1660.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/rfs/hhaa085
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hirvonen, Johannes & Kässi, Otto & Ropponen, Olli, 2023. "Jobs, Workers, and Firms: Dissecting the Labour Market Effects of Finland’s COVID-19 Subsidy Program," ETLA Working Papers 111, The Research Institute of the Finnish Economy.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • G51 - Financial Economics - - Household Finance - - - Household Savings, Borrowing, Debt, and Wealth
    • G53 - Financial Economics - - Household Finance - - - Financial Literacy
    • D14 - Microeconomics - - Household Behavior - - - Household Saving; Personal Finance
    • D18 - Microeconomics - - Household Behavior - - - Consumer Protection

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:rfinst:v:34:y:2021:i:4:p:1617-1660.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/sfsssea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.