IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/rfinst/v33y2020i1p44-74..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Liquidity Provision Contracts and Market Quality: Evidence from the New York Stock Exchange

Author

Listed:
  • Hendrik Bessembinder
  • Jia Hao
  • Kuncheng Zheng

Abstract

We exploit a discontinuity in the New York Stock Exchange Designated Market Maker (DMM) contract to identify causal effects of DMM participation on equilibrium market outcomes. We document that contractual features that enhance DMM participation are associated with increased depth, narrower bid-ask spreads, and higher rates of price improvement, with most of the improvements attributable to increases in liquidity provision on markets other than the NYSE. These results cannot be attributed to the mechanical effects of the contractual changes and support the interpretation that market making is characterized by strategic complementarity.Received October 7, 2017; editorial decision December 10, 2018 by Editor Itay Goldstein.

Suggested Citation

  • Hendrik Bessembinder & Jia Hao & Kuncheng Zheng, 2020. "Liquidity Provision Contracts and Market Quality: Evidence from the New York Stock Exchange," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 33(1), pages 44-74.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:rfinst:v:33:y:2020:i:1:p:44-74.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/rfs/hhz040
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Clapham, Benjamin & Gomber, Peter & Lausen, Jens & Panz, Sven, 2021. "Liquidity provider incentives in fragmented securities markets," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 16-38.
    2. Bogousslavsky, Vincent & Collin-Dufresne, Pierre & Sağlam, Mehmet, 2021. "Slow-moving capital and execution costs: Evidence from a major trading glitch," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 139(3), pages 922-949.
    3. Justin Cox & Bonnie Van Ness & Robert Van Ness, 2022. "The dark side of IPOs: Examining where and who trades in the IPO secondary market," Financial Management, Financial Management Association International, vol. 51(4), pages 1091-1126, December.
    4. Theissen, Erik & Westheide, Christian, 2022. "One for the money, two for the show? The number of designated market makers and liquidity," CFR Working Papers 22-10, University of Cologne, Centre for Financial Research (CFR).
    5. Theissen, Erik & Westheide, Christian, 2023. "One for the money, two for the show? The number of designated market makers and liquidity," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 224(C).
    6. Battalio, Robert & Jennings, Robert & McDonald, Bill, 2021. "Deviations from time priority on the NYSE," Journal of Financial Markets, Elsevier, vol. 53(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:rfinst:v:33:y:2020:i:1:p:44-74.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/sfsssea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.