IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/revage/v19y1997i1p108-121..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Reasonable Value and the Role of Negotiation in Agriculture's Use of the Environment

Author

Listed:
  • Richard F. Kazmierczak
  • David W. Hughes

Abstract

General environmental policy and restrictions specifically targeted at agriculture will continue to influence agricultural policy. Agricultural and environmental communities can react to these events in many ways, but the most promising way to resolve agricultural and environmental disputes lies in negotiated regulations mediated by governmental agencies. This approach should attract the agricultural community because it provides an opportunity to educate environmental groups about the complexities facing modern agriculture. It also ensures that regulators consider private business interests during policy development. While not a panacea, a negotiated regulations approach is the best hope for flexibly satisfying the dual objectives of a clean environment and an economically viable agricultural sector.

Suggested Citation

  • Richard F. Kazmierczak & David W. Hughes, 1997. "Reasonable Value and the Role of Negotiation in Agriculture's Use of the Environment," Review of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 19(1), pages 108-121.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:revage:v:19:y:1997:i:1:p:108-121.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.2307/1349681
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version below or search for a different version of it.

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Robert A. Leone & John E. Jackson, 1981. "The Political Economy of Federal Regulatory Activity: The Case of Water-Pollution Controls," NBER Chapters, in: Studies in Public Regulation, pages 231-276, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    2. Quiggin, John, 2012. "The Economics of New Media," Risk and Sustainable Management Group Working Papers 151528, University of Queensland, School of Economics.
    3. McGuire, Richard T., 1994. "A new model to reach water quality goals," Choices: The Magazine of Food, Farm, and Resource Issues, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 9(2), pages 1-4.
    4. Klonsky, Karen & Norris, Kim & Buckles, Rebekah, 1992. "Toxic Clean Up Of Ag Properties: Who Will Pay?," Choices: The Magazine of Food, Farm, and Resource Issues, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 7(2), pages 1-4.
    5. Paul Thompson, 1986. "The social goals of agriculture," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 3(4), pages 32-42, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Bilby, David B. & Wilson, Paul N., 2014. "Best Management Practices and the Mitigation of Dust Pollution: An Arizona Case Study," Working Papers 185894, University of Arizona, Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics.
    2. Fraser, Iain & Chisholm, Tony, 2000. "Conservation or cultural heritage? Cattle grazing in the Victoria Alpine National Park," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 33(1), pages 63-75, April.
    3. Jean-Daniel Rinaudo & Sylvie Morardet, 1999. "Acceptabilité des réformes des politiques de gestion de l'eau [Cadre d'analyse et exemples]," Économie rurale, Programme National Persée, vol. 254(1), pages 36-44.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ahmed, Sadiq, 1991. "Fiscal policyfor managing Indonesia's environment," Policy Research Working Paper Series 786, The World Bank.
    2. Jeffrey Gillespie & Ashok Mishra, 2011. "Off‐farm employment and reasons for entering farming as determinants of production enterprise selection in US agriculture," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 55(3), pages 411-428, July.
    3. Gerry Walter, 1992. "Communication and sustainable agriculture: Building agendas for research and practice," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 9(2), pages 27-37, March.
    4. Ayer, Harry W., 1997. "Grass Roots Collective Action: Agricultural Opportunities," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 22(1), pages 1-11, July.
    5. Adams, Samuel & Atsu, Francis, 2015. "Assessing the distributional effects of regulation in developing countries," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 37(5), pages 713-725.
    6. Stavins, Robert, 2005. "The Effects of Vintage-Differentiated Environmental Regulation," Working Paper Series rwp05-031, Harvard University, John F. Kennedy School of Government.
    7. Eliana Catia Gentilucci, 2015. "L?agricoltura civile e l?economia civile. Un modello italo-mediterraneo," AGRICOLTURA ISTITUZIONI MERCATI, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2015(1), pages 87-106.
    8. Ellis, John R. & Hughes, David W. & Butcher, Walter R., 1991. "Economic Modeling Of Farm Production And Conservation Decisions In Response To Alternative Resource And Environmental Policies," Northeastern Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association, vol. 20(1), pages 1-11, April.
    9. Poe, Gregory, 1997. ""Maximizing the Environmental Benefits per Dollar Expended" An Economic Interpretation and Review of Agricultural Environmental Benefits and Costs," EB Series 186405, Cornell University, Department of Applied Economics and Management.
    10. Douglas H. Constance, 2023. "The doctors of agrifood studies," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 40(1), pages 31-43, March.
    11. Keohane, Nathaniel O. & Revesz, Richard L. & Stavins, Robert N., 1997. "The Positive Political Economy of Instrument Choice in Environmental Policy," Discussion Papers 10759, Resources for the Future.
    12. Bills, Nelson L. & Poe, Gregory L. & Wright, Peter, 2003. "Using Voluntary Approaches to Reduce Environmental Damages: Evidence from a Survey of New York Dairy Farms," Japanese Journal of Agricultural Economics (formerly Japanese Journal of Rural Economics), Agricultural Economics Society of Japan (AESJ), vol. 5, pages 1-16.
    13. Quiggin, John, 1995. "Common property in agricultural production," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 26(2), pages 179-200, March.
    14. Poe, Gregory L. & Bills, Nelson L. & Bellows, Barbara & Crosscombe, Patricia & Koelsch, Rick & Kreher, Michael & Wright, Peter, 1999. "Documenting the Status of Dairy Manure Management in New York: Current Practices and Willingness to Participate in Voluntary Programs," Staff Papers 121154, Cornell University, Department of Applied Economics and Management.
    15. Nyaupane, Narayan & Gillespie, Jeffrey & Ken, McMillin, 2014. "Goal Structure of U.S. Meat Goat Producers: Is Farm Performance Consistent with the Goals?," 2014 Annual Meeting, February 1-4, 2014, Dallas, Texas 162502, Southern Agricultural Economics Association.
    16. Quiggin, John C., 2001. "Environmental economics and the Murray-Darling river system," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 45(1), pages 1-28.
    17. Quiggin, John C., 1991. "Salinity Mitigation in the Murray River System," Review of Marketing and Agricultural Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 59(01), pages 1-13, April.
    18. Cornelissen, A.M.G. & van den Berg, J.H. & Koops, W.J. & Kaymak, U., 2002. "Eliciting Expert Knowledge for Fuzzy Evaluation of Agricultural Production Systems," ERIM Report Series Research in Management ERS-2002-108-LIS, Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), ERIM is the joint research institute of the Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University and the Erasmus School of Economics (ESE) at Erasmus University Rotterdam.
    19. Hasan, Lubna, 2002. "Revisiting Commons – Are Common Property Regimes Irrational?," MPRA Paper 8316, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    20. Carolyn Raffensperger & Mora Campbell & Paul Thompson, 1998. "Considering The Spirit of the Soil by Paul B. Thompson," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 15(2), pages 161-176, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:revage:v:19:y:1997:i:1:p:108-121.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press or Christopher F. Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aaeaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.