IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/revage/v19y1997i1p108-121..html

Reasonable Value and the Role of Negotiation in Agriculture's Use of the Environment

Author

Listed:
  • Richard F. Kazmierczak
  • David W. Hughes

Abstract

General environmental policy and restrictions specifically targeted at agriculture will continue to influence agricultural policy. Agricultural and environmental communities can react to these events in many ways, but the most promising way to resolve agricultural and environmental disputes lies in negotiated regulations mediated by governmental agencies. This approach should attract the agricultural community because it provides an opportunity to educate environmental groups about the complexities facing modern agriculture. It also ensures that regulators consider private business interests during policy development. While not a panacea, a negotiated regulations approach is the best hope for flexibly satisfying the dual objectives of a clean environment and an economically viable agricultural sector.

Suggested Citation

  • Richard F. Kazmierczak & David W. Hughes, 1997. "Reasonable Value and the Role of Negotiation in Agriculture's Use of the Environment," Review of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 19(1), pages 108-121.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:revage:v:19:y:1997:i:1:p:108-121.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.2307/1349681
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version below or

    for a different version of it.

    Other versions of this item:

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Bilby, David B. & Wilson, Paul N., 2014. "Best Management Practices and the Mitigation of Dust Pollution: An Arizona Case Study," Working Papers 185894, University of Arizona, Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics.
    3. Rinaudo, Jean-Daniel & Morardet, Sylvie, 1999. "Acceptabilité des réformes des politiques de gestion de l'eau," Économie rurale, French Society of Rural Economics (SFER Société Française d'Economie Rurale), vol. 254.
    4. Fraser, Iain & Chisholm, Tony, 2000. "Conservation or cultural heritage? Cattle grazing in the Victoria Alpine National Park," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 33(1), pages 63-75, April.
    5. Jean-Daniel Rinaudo & Sylvie Morardet, 1999. "Acceptabilité des réformes des politiques de gestion de l'eau [Cadre d'analyse et exemples]," Économie rurale, Programme National Persée, vol. 254(1), pages 36-44.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:revage:v:19:y:1997:i:1:p:108-121.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask Oxford University Press to update the entry or send us the correct address or Christopher F. Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aaeaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.