IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/qjecon/v58y1944i2p246-264..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Opposition to Union Officers in Elections

Author

Listed:
  • Philip Taft

Abstract

Significance of the problem, 246. — Opposition in elections relatively infrequent, 248. — No relation between opposition and method of election, 251. — The International Typographical Union: sub-lists, 253; the Brotherhood of the Union of North America, 255; the Wahnetas, 257; the Progressive Party, 258; election campaigns, 259; reasons for political divisions, 262.— Conclusions, 263.

Suggested Citation

  • Philip Taft, 1944. "Opposition to Union Officers in Elections," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 58(2), pages 246-264.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:qjecon:v:58:y:1944:i:2:p:246-264.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.2307/1883319
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sakhela Buhlungu & Mick Brookes & Geoffrey Wood, 2008. "Trade Unions and Democracy in South Africa: Union Organizational Challenges and Solidarities in a Time of Transformation," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 46(3), pages 439-468, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:qjecon:v:58:y:1944:i:2:p:246-264.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/qje .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.