IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

Lessons from a Comparison of U.S. and U.K. Insolvency Codes

Listed author(s):
  • Franks, Julian R
  • Torous, Walter N
Registered author(s):

    The paper describes two insolvency codes, those of the United Kingdom and the United States, and appraises their efficiency using five criteria, including (1) premature and deferred liquidation, (2) adherence to the terms of the debt contract, (3) direct costs of insolvency, (4) over or under investment, (5) other stakeholders interests. The principles underlying the two systems differ in some fundamental respects. The main objective of Chapter 11 of the 1978 U.S. Bankruptcy Code is to maintain the business as a going concern, even if that reduces the proceeds available to creditors. As a result, the code has been deliberately designed to be highly debtor-oriented. In contrast, the main objective of the U.K. Code is the repayment of creditors' claims. As a result, the U.K. has had, at least prior to 1986, a highly debtor-oriented code. The paper examines the main features of each code which give rise to these assertions. Copyright 1992 by Oxford University Press.

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below under "Related research" whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Article provided by Oxford University Press in its journal Oxford Review of Economic Policy.

    Volume (Year): 8 (1992)
    Issue (Month): 3 (Autumn)
    Pages: 70-82

    in new window

    Handle: RePEc:oup:oxford:v:8:y:1992:i:3:p:70-82
    Contact details of provider: Web page:

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:oxford:v:8:y:1992:i:3:p:70-82. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Oxford University Press)

    or (Christopher F. Baum)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.