IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/oxford/v17y2001i2p265-281.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Economic Organization, Innovation Systems, and the Internet

Author

Listed:
  • Steven Casper
  • Henrik Glimstedt

Abstract

How can public policy best promote successful innovation in the Internet sector? This paper creates a typology of different types of Internet software firms. Institutions associated with the 'Silicon Valley Model' are a strong driver of success for some key Internet technologies. However, patterns of human-resource development and knowledge management vary widely across Internet technologies, necessitating the development of very different commitments between managers and employees. Institutional frameworks associated with 'organized' economies, such as Germany or Japan, might provide superior tool-kits to help some types of Internet firms to innovate. Furthermore, our analysis suggests that the creation of institutional incentives is not the only way to promote patterns of technologically intense innovation associated with Silicon Valley. Technological strategies of dominant firms are often equally important. Regardless of institutional environment, the development of entrepreneurial software firms can be strongly influenced by the activities of large firms working within core network telecommunication technologies. Copyright 2001, Oxford University Press.

Suggested Citation

  • Steven Casper & Henrik Glimstedt, 2001. "Economic Organization, Innovation Systems, and the Internet," Oxford Review of Economic Policy, Oxford University Press and Oxford Review of Economic Policy Limited, vol. 17(2), pages 265-281, Summer.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:oxford:v:17:y:2001:i:2:p:265-281
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Werle, Raymund, 2011. "Institutional analysis of technical innovation: A review," Research Contributions to Organizational Sociology and Innovation Studies, SOI Discussion Papers 2011-04, University of Stuttgart, Institute for Social Sciences, Department of Organizational Sociology and Innovation Studies.
    2. Casper, Steven & Whitley, Richard, 2004. "Managing competences in entrepreneurial technology firms: a comparative institutional analysis of Germany, Sweden and the UK," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 33(1), pages 89-106, January.
    3. Koeniger, Winfried, 2003. "Collective Dismissal Cost, Product Market Competition and Innovation," IZA Discussion Papers 888, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    4. Steven Casper & Richard Whitley, 2002. "Managing competences in entrepreneurial technology firms: a comparative institutional analysis of Germany, Sweden and the UK," Working Papers wp230, Centre for Business Research, University of Cambridge.
    5. Andrea Bassanini & Ekkehard Ernst, 2002. "Labour market regulation, industrial relations and technological regimes: a tale of comparative advantage," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press, vol. 11(3), pages 391-426, June.
    6. Sanchita Kuchi & Sumeet Gupta, 2023. "Value-Creation Strategies for E-Commerce Businesses," IIM Kozhikode Society & Management Review, , vol. 12(2), pages 234-249, July.
    7. Engelhardt, Lutz, 2005. "Geschäftsmodelle und nationale Institutionen: Ein Vergleich britischer und deutscher Neuemissionen aus der IT-Service- und Softwareindustrie 1996-2002," Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Institutions, States, Markets SP II 2005-01, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
    8. Hongyu Liu & Shukuan Zhao & Ouyang Xin, 2019. "Analysis on the Evolution Path and Hotspot of Knowledge Innovation Study Based on Knowledge Map," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-14, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:oxford:v:17:y:2001:i:2:p:265-281. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/oxrep .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.