IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/
MyIDEAS: Login to save this article or follow this journal

Evidence on Simulation Inference for Near Unit-Root Processes with Implications for Term Structure Estimation

  • Gregory R. Duffee

The high persistence of interest rates has important implications for the preferred method used to estimate term structure models. We study the finite-sample properties of two standard dynamic simulation methods—efficient method of moments (EMM) and indirect inference—when they are applied to an first order autoregressive (AR[1]) process with Gaussian innovations. When simulated data are as persistent as interest rates, the finite-sample properties of EMM differ both from their asymptotic properties and from the finite-sample properties of indirect inference and maximum likelihood. EMM produces larger confidence bounds than indirect inference and maximum likelihood, yet is much less likely to contain the true parameter value. This is primarily because the population variance of the data plays a much larger role in the EMM conditions than in the moment conditions for either indirect inference or maximum likelihood. These results suggest that, under Gaussian assumptions, indirect inference (if practical) is preferable to EMM when working with persistent data such as interest rates. EMM's emphasis on the population variance strongly enforces stationarity on the underlying process, so this same reasoning suggests that EMM may be preferable in settings where stability and stationarity are important and difficult to impose. Copyright The Author 2007. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org, Oxford University Press.

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/jjfinec/nbm014
Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.

Article provided by Society for Financial Econometrics in its journal Journal of Financial Econometrics.

Volume (Year): 6 (2008)
Issue (Month): 1 (Winter)
Pages: 108-142

as
in new window

Handle: RePEc:oup:jfinec:v:6:y:2008:i:1:p:108-142
Contact details of provider: Postal: Oxford University Press, Great Clarendon Street, Oxford OX2 6DP, UK
Fax: 01865 267 985
Web page: http://jfec.oxfordjournals.org/
Email:


More information through EDIRC

Order Information: Web: http://www.oup.co.uk/journals

No references listed on IDEAS
You can help add them by filling out this form.

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:jfinec:v:6:y:2008:i:1:p:108-142. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Oxford University Press)

or (Christopher F. Baum)

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.