IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/jecgeo/v19y2019i3p677-704..html

Does agglomeration discourage fertility? Evidence from the Japanese General Social Survey 2000–2010

Author

Listed:
  • Keisuke Kondo

Abstract

This study employs Japanese household-level data to quantify the extent to which congestion diseconomy in large cities affects married couples’ fertility behavior. The theoretical model of this study emphasizes the importance of controlling for preference heterogeneity in the demand for children. The baseline quantification shows that, all else equal, a 10-fold difference in city size generates a spatial variation of −22.13% in the average number of children born to couples aged 30 and a spatial variation of −6.07% at age 49. The narrowing of the gap suggests that the young married couples in larger cities delay childbearing.

Suggested Citation

  • Keisuke Kondo, 2019. "Does agglomeration discourage fertility? Evidence from the Japanese General Social Survey 2000–2010," Journal of Economic Geography, Oxford University Press, vol. 19(3), pages 677-704.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:jecgeo:v:19:y:2019:i:3:p:677-704.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/jeg/lbx048
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version below or

    for a different version of it.

    Other versions of this item:

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hiroshi Goto & Keiya Minamimura, 2019. "Geography and Demography: New Economic Geography With Endogenous Fertility," The Japanese Economic Review, Japanese Economic Association, vol. 70(4), pages 537-568, December.
    2. Xiaoyin Li & John V. Winters, 2024. "Fertility divergence across large and small areas," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 55(2), June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • J10 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demographic Economics - - - General
    • J13 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demographic Economics - - - Fertility; Family Planning; Child Care; Children; Youth
    • R23 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - Household Analysis - - - Regional Migration; Regional Labor Markets; Population

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:jecgeo:v:19:y:2019:i:3:p:677-704.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/joeg .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.