IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/jconrs/v48y2022i5p885-903..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Syntax and the Illusion of Fit: How Grammatical Subject Influences Persuasion
[$29 for 70 Items or 70 Items for $29? How Presentation Order Affects Package Perceptions]

Author

Listed:
  • Massimiliano Ostinelli
  • David Luna

Abstract

We examine how the grammatical subject of a marketing claim affects persuasion. We refer to this phenomenon as the subject bias and introduce the distinction between users subjects (where product users are the grammatical subject of a sentence) and product subjects (where the product is the grammatical subject of the sentence). We find that users subjects can lead to an illusion of fit, where a reader believes that an offer provides a better fit for oneself than for other consumers, which, in turn, affects persuasion. Eight experiments, including a field study, provide support for the subject bias in different domains, ranging from online dating services to medical products, and uncover the underlying process along with its boundary conditions while ruling out alternative explanations. These findings advance the understanding of the antecedents and consequences of idiosyncratic fit and introduce a novel language effect in consumer research that has theoretical, methodological, and practical implications.

Suggested Citation

  • Massimiliano Ostinelli & David Luna, 2022. "Syntax and the Illusion of Fit: How Grammatical Subject Influences Persuasion [$29 for 70 Items or 70 Items for $29? How Presentation Order Affects Package Perceptions]," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 48(5), pages 885-903.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:jconrs:v:48:y:2022:i:5:p:885-903.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/jcr/ucab021
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:jconrs:v:48:y:2022:i:5:p:885-903.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/jcr .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.