IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/jconrs/v17y1990i1p94-104.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Factorial Preference Structures

Author

Listed:
  • Moore, William L

Abstract

This article presents a way to model individual preferences and purchase intentions under the assumption that the pattern of relative similarity or substitutability among brands can be represented factorially. Factorial preference structure represent a compromise between the Luce model, which assumes that none of the alternatives share any common features, and EBA, which assumes that each possible subset of a choice set has a unique set of common features. Factorial preference structures are compared to several hierarchical structures and to one that assumes that preferences are simply scalable. Copyright 1990 by the University of Chicago.

Suggested Citation

  • Moore, William L, 1990. "Factorial Preference Structures," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 17(1), pages 94-104, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:jconrs:v:17:y:1990:i:1:p:94-104
    DOI: 10.1086/208540
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/208540
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1086/208540?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Batsell Richard R., 2004. "A New Approach for Capturing and Potraying the Competitive Structure of a Market: An Application To The Bush-Kerry-Nader Presidential Contest," Review of Marketing Science, De Gruyter, vol. 2(1), pages 1-14, September.
    2. Andrews, Rick L. & Manrai, Ajay K., 1998. "Feature-based elimination: Model and empirical comparison," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 111(2), pages 248-267, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:jconrs:v:17:y:1990:i:1:p:94-104. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/jcr .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.