IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/indcch/v22y2013i2p459-487.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Resource partitioning revisited: evidence from Italian television broadcasting

Author

Listed:
  • Samira Reis
  • Giacomo Negro
  • Olav Sorenson
  • Fabrizio Perretti
  • Alessandro Lomi

Abstract

The theory of resource partitioning proposes that competition among generalists in the center of a market can trigger a process of resource release that engenders a proliferation of specialist producers outside the center. Previous research has generally examined the relationship between this proliferation and market concentration--a correlate of competitive intensity in the center of the market. In this paper, we extend the theory by arguing that resource release also occurs as the degree of competitive overlap among producers in the center intensifies, even when concentration or other structural features do not vary; we expand its implications by demonstrating that increased competitive overlap in the market center can enhance the viability of producers positioned near the center more than those in the periphery; and we enrich and complete it by specifying the additional assumptions needed to extend the theory of resource partitioning to entry processes. Consistent with our expectations, an empirical examination of the Italian broadcast television industry, from 1992 to 2003, finds that the failure rates of both near-center and peripheral stations decline with greater competitive overlap in the programming of the national broadcasters, with the failure rates of the near-center stations falling more than those of peripheral stations. Greater competitive overlap similarly stimulates the entry of near-center stations more than peripheral ones. Copyright 2013 The Author 2012. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Associazione ICC. All rights reserved., Oxford University Press.

Suggested Citation

  • Samira Reis & Giacomo Negro & Olav Sorenson & Fabrizio Perretti & Alessandro Lomi, 2013. "Resource partitioning revisited: evidence from Italian television broadcasting," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 22(2), pages 459-487, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:indcch:v:22:y:2013:i:2:p:459-487
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/icc/dts020
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Christopher C. Liu & Sameer B. Srivastava & Toby E. Stuart, 2016. "An Intraorganizational Ecology of Individual Attainment," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 27(1), pages 90-105, February.
    2. J. Cameron Verhaal & Olga M. Khessina & Stanislav D. Dobrev, 2015. "Oppositional Product Names, Organizational Identities, and Product Appeal," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 26(5), pages 1466-1484, October.
    3. Min Liu & Filippo Carlo Wezel, 2015. "Davids Against Goliath? Collective Identities and the Market Success of Peripheral Organizations During Resource Partitioning," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 26(1), pages 293-309, February.
    4. J. Cameron Verhaal & Jake D. Hoskins & Leif W. Lundmark, 2017. "Little Fish in a Big Pond: Legitimacy Transfer, Authenticity, and Factors of Peripheral Firm Entry and Growth in the Market Center," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(12), pages 2532-2552, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:indcch:v:22:y:2013:i:2:p:459-487. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/icc .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.