IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/geronb/v67by2012i1p13-17.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Meta-Analysis of Positive and Negative Age Stereotype Priming Effects on Behavior Among Older Adults

Author

Listed:
  • Brad A. Meisner

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Brad A. Meisner, 2012. "A Meta-Analysis of Positive and Negative Age Stereotype Priming Effects on Behavior Among Older Adults," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 67(1), pages 13-17.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:67b:y:2012:i:1:p:13-17
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/geronb/gbr062
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Joie Molden & Molly Maxfield, 2017. "The impact of aging stereotypes on dementia worry," European Journal of Ageing, Springer, vol. 14(1), pages 29-37, March.
    2. Stefan Hopf & Kieran Walsh & Eilionóir Flynn & Nena Georgantzi, 2021. "The Relationship between Ageism and Well-Being as Mediated through COVID-19-Related Experiences and Discourses," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(19), pages 1-17, October.
    3. Anne J. Dutt & Hans-Werner Wahl, 2019. "Future time perspective and general self-efficacy mediate the association between awareness of age-related losses and depressive symptoms," European Journal of Ageing, Springer, vol. 16(2), pages 227-236, June.
    4. Martina Gabrian & Hans-Werner Wahl, 2017. "Being slower, feeling older? Experimentally induced cognitive aging experiences have limited impact on subjective age," European Journal of Ageing, Springer, vol. 14(2), pages 179-188, June.
    5. Anna E. Kornadt & Eva-Marie Kessler & Susanne Wurm & Catherine E. Bowen & Martina Gabrian & Verena Klusmann, 2020. "Views on ageing: a lifespan perspective," European Journal of Ageing, Springer, vol. 17(4), pages 387-401, December.
    6. Min Young Kim & Seieun Oh, 2020. "Nurses’ Perspectives on Health Education and Health Literacy of Older Patients," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(18), pages 1-11, September.
    7. Lotte P. Brinkhof & Sanne de Wit & Jaap M. J. Murre & Harm J. Krugers & K. Richard Ridderinkhof, 2022. "The Subjective Experience of Ageism: The Perceived Ageism Questionnaire (PAQ)," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(14), pages 1-21, July.
    8. Mariusz Wysokiński & Wiesław Fidecki & Tomasz Plech & Irena Wrońska & Magda Kamila Pawelec & Beata Dziedzic, 2020. "Perception of Old Age by the Inhabitants of Poland," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(7), pages 1-7, April.
    9. Anne Cornelia Kroon & Damian Trilling & Martine Selm & Rens Vliegenthart, 2019. "Biased media? How news content influences age discrimination claims," European Journal of Ageing, Springer, vol. 16(1), pages 109-119, March.
    10. Allyson Brothers & Martina Miche & Hans-Werner Wahl & Manfred Diehl, 2017. "Examination of Associations Among Three Distinct Subjective Aging Constructs and Their Relevance for Predicting Developmental Correlates," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 72(4), pages 547-560.
    11. Schniter, Eric & Shields, Timothy W., 2014. "Ageism, honesty, and trust," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 19-29.
    12. Catherine E. Bowen & Svenja M. Spuling & Anna E. Kornadt & Maja Wiest, 2020. "Young people feel wise and older people feel energetic: comparing age stereotypes and self-evaluations across adulthood," European Journal of Ageing, Springer, vol. 17(4), pages 435-444, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:67b:y:2012:i:1:p:13-17. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/psychsocgerontology .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.