IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/ereveh/v21y2017i4p393-413..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Monopoly power in the eighteenth-century British book trade

Author

Listed:
  • David Fielding
  • Shef Rogers

Abstract

Some authors have argued that reform of British copyright law during the eighteenth century broke the Stationers’ Company monopoly over the English book trade, and the resulting competition was a driving force behind the expansion of British book production during the enlightenment. We analyse a new dataset on eighteenth-century book prices and author payments, showing that the legal changes were associated with no reduction in prices and only a temporary increase in payments to authors. Other economic factors led to a gradual reduction in the booksellers’ mark-ups, but there is no evidence that the legal reforms diminished their monopoly power.

Suggested Citation

  • David Fielding & Shef Rogers, 2017. "Monopoly power in the eighteenth-century British book trade," European Review of Economic History, European Historical Economics Society, vol. 21(4), pages 393-413.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:ereveh:v:21:y:2017:i:4:p:393-413.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/ereh/hex007
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:ereveh:v:21:y:2017:i:4:p:393-413.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/ereh .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.