IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/erevae/v32y2005i1p25-49.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Endogenous norms and preferencesand the farm income problem

Author

Listed:
  • Rein Haagsma

Abstract

A two-sector model with non-overlapping generations is presented, where rural occupational mobility is hampered by endogenous norms and preferences. The occupational choice of farm youths may be influenced by an inherited belief in the farming way of life and a related social norm that sanctions mobility. This results in a bias towards farming occupations which, via preference formation, tends to promote the norm across generations. The model is used to explain various stylised facts of the farm problem, such as low farm incomes, small holdings and crowding on the land. By showing how these phenomena are mitigated by individualisation and increased integration of farmers into non-farming societies, an explanation is offered as to why the farm income problem has diminished. Copyright 2005, Oxford University Press.

Suggested Citation

  • Rein Haagsma, 2005. "Endogenous norms and preferencesand the farm income problem," European Review of Agricultural Economics, Oxford University Press and the European Agricultural and Applied Economics Publications Foundation, vol. 32(1), pages 25-49, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:erevae:v:32:y:2005:i:1:p:25-49
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Luigi Aldieri & Gennaro Guida & Maxim Kotsemir & Concetto Paolo Vinci, 2019. "An investigation of impact of research collaboration on academic performance in Italy," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 53(4), pages 2003-2040, July.
    2. Rocchi, B & Marino, M & Severini, S, 2018. "Does a farm household income problem still exist in the European Union?," 2018 Seventh AIEAA Conference, June 14-15, Conegliano, Italy 275653, Italian Association of Agricultural and Applied Economics (AIEAA).
    3. Aldieri, Luigi & Kotsemir, Maxim & Vinci, Concetto Paolo, 2018. "The impact of research collaboration on academic performance: An empirical analysis for some European countries," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 13-30.
    4. Benedetto Rocchi & Maria Marino & Simone Severini, 2021. "Does an Income Gap between Farm and Nonfarm Households Still Exist? The Case of the European Union," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 43(4), pages 1672-1697, December.
    5. Luigi Aldieri & Maxim N. Kotsemir & Concetto Paolo Vinci, 2020. "The Effects of Collaboration on Research Performance of Universities: an Analysis by Federal District and Scientific Fields in Russia," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 11(2), pages 766-787, June.
    6. Aleksander Grzelak, 2022. "The income-assets relationship for farms operating under selected models in Poland," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 68(2), pages 59-67.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:erevae:v:32:y:2005:i:1:p:25-49. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/eaaeeea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.