IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/econjl/v134y2024i660p1401-1430..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Gender and Leadership in Organisations: the Threat of Backlash

Author

Listed:
  • Priyanka Chakraborty
  • Danila Serra

Abstract

Decisions made by leaders please some people and upset others. We examine whether the possibility of backlash has a differential impact on men’s and women’s self-selection into leadership roles, and their decisions as leaders. In a laboratory experiment that simulates corporate decision-making, we find that women are significantly less likely to self-select into a leadership position when they can receive backlash. Once in a leadership role, women get more backlash. There are some gender differences in leaders’ decision-making and communication styles under the threat of backlash, but little difference in final outcomes. An online experiment sheds light on possible mechanisms.

Suggested Citation

  • Priyanka Chakraborty & Danila Serra, 2024. "Gender and Leadership in Organisations: the Threat of Backlash," The Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 134(660), pages 1401-1430.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:econjl:v:134:y:2024:i:660:p:1401-1430.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/ej/uead110
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:econjl:v:134:y:2024:i:660:p:1401-1430.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press or the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/resssea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.