IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/cjrecs/v15y2022i2p389-406..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The global division of labour as enduring archipelago: thinking through the spatiality of ‘globalisation in reverse’
[Uneven and combined state capitalism]

Author

Listed:
  • Michiel van Meeteren
  • Jana Kleibert

Abstract

Contemporary globalisation faces several challenges, for instance related to climate change, technological disruption and shifting geopolitics, that have repercussions for the organisation of value chains and the global division of labour. Analysing the long-term geographies of globalisation we observe how successive reconfigurations of ‘new’ and ‘newer’ global divisions of labour share an archipelagic socio-spatial structure. The paper theorizes the articulations of this archipelago spatial figure as a combination of de/bordering, dis/connecting and dis/association. We apply this framework to provide a nuanced assessment of how global capitalism might restructure when some processes that defined globalisation during the last decades kick in reverse.

Suggested Citation

  • Michiel van Meeteren & Jana Kleibert, 2022. "The global division of labour as enduring archipelago: thinking through the spatiality of ‘globalisation in reverse’ [Uneven and combined state capitalism]," Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 15(2), pages 389-406.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:cjrecs:v:15:y:2022:i:2:p:389-406.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/cjres/rsac007
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Thomas Sigler & Kirsten Martinus & Iacopo Iacopini & Ben Derudder, 2020. "The role of tax havens and offshore financial centres in shaping corporate geographies: an industry sector perspective," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(5), pages 621-633, May.
    2. Beverley Mullings, 2004. "Globalization and the territorialization of the new Caribbean service economy," Journal of Economic Geography, Oxford University Press, vol. 4(3), pages 275-298, June.
    3. Nicholas A. Phelps & Miguel Atienza & Martin Arias, 2015. "Encore for the Enclave: The Changing Nature of the Industry Enclave with Illustrations from the Mining Industry in Chile," Economic Geography, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 91(2), pages 119-146, April.
    4. Zac J. Taylor & Manuel B. Aalbers, 2022. "Climate Gentrification: Risk, Rent, and Restructuring in Greater Miami," Annals of the American Association of Geographers, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 112(6), pages 1685-1701, August.
    5. Judith Clifton & Amy Glasmeier & Mia Gray, 2020. "When machines think for us: the consequences for work and place," Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 13(1), pages 3-23.
    6. Harvey, David, 2005. "The New Imperialism," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780199278084.
    7. Michiel Van Meeteren & David Bassens, 2016. "World Cities and the Uneven Geographies of Financialization: Unveiling Stratification and Hierarchy in the World City Archipelago," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(1), pages 62-81, January.
    8. Jennifer Bair & Marion Werner, 2011. "Commodity Chains and the Uneven Geographies of Global Capitalism: A Disarticulations Perspective," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 43(5), pages 988-997, May.
    9. Kleibert, Jana M., 2020. "Brexit geographies of transnational education: uncertainty, ‘global Britain’ and European (re-)integration," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, issue Latest Ar.
    10. Finbarr Livesey, 2018. "Commentary Unpacking the possibilities of deglobalisation," Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 11(1), pages 177-187.
    11. Ron Martin & Peter Tyler & Michael Storper & Emil Evenhuis & Amy Glasmeier, 2018. "Globalisation at a critical conjuncture?," Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 11(1), pages 3-16.
    12. Ben Derudder & Peter J. Taylor, 2020. "Three Globalizations Shaping the Twenty-first Century: Understanding the New World Geography through Its Cities," Annals of the American Association of Geographers, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 110(6), pages 1831-1854, November.
    13. Susan Christopherson & Harry Garretsen & Ron Martin, 2008. "The world is not flat: putting globalization in its place," Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 1(3), pages 343-349.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Huiwen Gong & Robert Hassink & Christopher Foster & Martin Hess & Harry Garretsen, 2022. "Globalisation in reverse? Reconfiguring the geographies of value chains and production networks [Does Covid-19 Spark the End of Globalisation?]," Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 15(2), pages 165-181.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. van Meeteren, Michiel & Kleibert, Jana, 2022. "The global division of labour as enduring archipelago: thinking through the spatiality of ‘globalisation in reverse’," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 15(2), pages 389-406.
    2. Al Rainnie, 2021. "i4.0, 3D printing, deglobalisation and new manufacturing clusters: The view from Australia," The Economic and Labour Relations Review, , vol. 32(1), pages 115-133, March.
    3. Mark Lorenzen & Ram Mudambi & Andreas Schotter, 0. "International connectedness and local disconnectedness: MNE strategy, city-regions and disruption," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 0, pages 1-24.
    4. Christof Parnreiter, 2022. "The Janus-faced genius of cities," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 59(7), pages 1315-1333, May.
    5. Huiwen Gong & Robert Hassink & Christopher Foster & Martin Hess & Harry Garretsen, 2022. "Globalisation in reverse? Reconfiguring the geographies of value chains and production networks [Does Covid-19 Spark the End of Globalisation?]," Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 15(2), pages 165-181.
    6. Mark Lorenzen & Ram Mudambi & Andreas Schotter, 2020. "International connectedness and local disconnectedness: MNE strategy, city-regions and disruption," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 51(8), pages 1199-1222, October.
    7. Peter A.G. van Bergeijk, 2019. "Deglobalization 2.0," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 18560.
    8. Jim Glassman, 2018. "Geopolitical economies of development and democratization in East Asia: Themes, concepts, and geographies," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 50(2), pages 407-415, March.
    9. Patricia M Martin, 2005. "Comparative Topographies of Neoliberalism in Mexico," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 37(2), pages 203-220, February.
    10. Helga Leitner & Eric Sheppard, 2018. "From Kampungs to Condos? Contested accumulations through displacement in Jakarta," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 50(2), pages 437-456, March.
    11. Rajani Naidoo, 2011. "Rethinking Development: Higher Education and the New Imperialism," Chapters, in: Roger King & Simon Marginson & Rajani Naidoo (ed.), Handbook on Globalization and Higher Education, chapter 3, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    12. Ahmed, Abubakari & Kuusaana, Elias Danyi & Gasparatos, Alexandros, 2018. "The role of chiefs in large-scale land acquisitions for jatropha production in Ghana: insights from agrarian political economy," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 570-582.
    13. Fullerton, Thomas M., Jr. & Sawyer, W. Charles & Sprinkle, Richard L., 2010. "Intra-industry trade in Latin America and the Caribbean," MPRA Paper 34854, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 2011.
    14. Chavers, Monyai & Tekola, Sarra & Carroo, Winston & Sherrod, Mikhiela & Shange, Raymon, 2021. "The Intersectionality of Racism, Globalization, Climate Change, and Forced Migration," Professional Agricultural Workers Journal (PAWJ), Professional Agricultural Workers Conference, vol. 8(1), October.
    15. Knudsen, Daniel C. & Rickly, Jillian M. & Vidon, Elizabeth S., 2016. "The fantasy of authenticity: Touring with Lacan," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 33-45.
    16. George Stathakis, 2008. "Imperialism: Old and New Theories," International Journal of Business and Economic Sciences Applied Research (IJBESAR), International Hellenic University (IHU), Kavala Campus, Greece (formerly Eastern Macedonia and Thrace Institute of Technology - EMaTTech), vol. 1(1), pages 100-124, April.
    17. Sarah Ryser, 2019. "The Anti-Politics Machine of Green Energy Development: The Moroccan Solar Project in Ouarzazate and Its Impact on Gendered Local Communities," Land, MDPI, vol. 8(6), pages 1-21, June.
    18. Jessica Parish, 2023. "Fiduciary Activism From Below: Green Gentrification, Pension Finance, and the Possibility of Just Urban Futures," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(1), pages 414-425.
    19. Ross Beveridge & Philippe Koch, 2017. "The post-political trap? Reflections on politics, agency and the city," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 54(1), pages 31-43, January.
    20. Ramón E. López, 2020. "Economics and Politics: A Unifying Framework," Working Papers wp496, University of Chile, Department of Economics.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:cjrecs:v:15:y:2022:i:2:p:389-406.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/cjres .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.