IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/cesifo/v60y2014i2p312-337..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Do Family Planning Programs Decrease Poverty? Evidence from Public Census Data

Author

Listed:
  • Martha J. Bailey
  • Olga Malkova
  • Johannes Norling

Abstract

This article provides new evidence that family planning programs are associated with a decrease in the share of children and adults living in poverty. Our research design exploits the county roll-out of US family planning programs in the late 1960s and early 1970s and examines their relationship with poverty rates in the short and longer-term in public census data. We find that cohorts born after federal family planning programs began were less likely to live in poverty in childhood and that these same cohorts were less likely to live in poverty as adults. (JEL codes: I3, J13, J18)

Suggested Citation

  • Martha J. Bailey & Olga Malkova & Johannes Norling, 2014. "Do Family Planning Programs Decrease Poverty? Evidence from Public Census Data," CESifo Economic Studies, CESifo Group, vol. 60(2), pages 312-337.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:cesifo:v:60:y:2014:i:2:p:312-337.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/cesifo/ifu011
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Amuedo-Dorantes, Catalina & Arenas-Arroyo, Esther & Sevilla, Almudena, 2018. "Immigration enforcement and economic resources of children with likely unauthorized parents," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 63-78.
    2. Amuedo-Dorantes, Catalina & Antman, Francisca, 2016. "Can authorization reduce poverty among undocumented immigrants? Evidence from the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 1-4.
    3. Kiros Terefe Gashaye & Adino Tesfahun Tsegaye & Solomon Mekonnen Abebe & Mulat Adefris Woldetsadik & Tadesse Awoke Ayele & Zelalem Mengistu Gashaw, 2020. "Determinants of long acting reversible contraception utilization in Northwest Ethiopia: An institution-based case control study," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(10), pages 1-19, October.
    4. Martha J. Bailey & Olga Malkova & Zoë M. McLaren, 2016. "Does Family Planning Increase Children’S Opportunities? Evidence From The War On Poverty And The Early Years Of Title X," Working Papers 16-29, Center for Economic Studies, U.S. Census Bureau.
    5. Martha Bailey & Olga Malkova & Zoë McLaren, 2016. "Does Family Planning Increase Children's Opportunities? Evidence from the War on Poverty and the Title X," Sciences Po publications 57, Sciences Po.
    6. Sheuli Misra & Srinivas Goli & Md Juel Rana & Abhishek Gautam & Nitin Datta & Priya Nanda & Ravi Verma, 2021. "Family Welfare Expenditure, Contraceptive Use, Sources and Method-Mix in India," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-20, August.
    7. Gigi R. Kerber & Nicolo P. Pinchak, 2022. "Consistency of Health Insurance Coverage and Women’s Reproductive Healthcare Access During Early Adulthood," Population Research and Policy Review, Springer;Southern Demographic Association (SDA), vol. 41(3), pages 825-842, June.
    8. Amuedo-Dorantes, Catalina & Arenas-Arroyo, Esther & Sevilla, Almudena, 2016. "Immigration Enforcement and Childhood Poverty in the United States," IZA Discussion Papers 10030, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    9. repec:hal:spmain:info:hdl:2441/4m2172qdla9frbe808qonnn40r is not listed on IDEAS

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • I3 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Welfare, Well-Being, and Poverty
    • J13 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demographic Economics - - - Fertility; Family Planning; Child Care; Children; Youth
    • J18 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demographic Economics - - - Public Policy

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:cesifo:v:60:y:2014:i:2:p:312-337.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cesifde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.