IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/cambje/v11y1987i2p133-64.html

The Dynamics of Competition: A Restoration of the Classical Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Dumenil, Gerard
  • Levy, Dominique

Abstract

The main purpose of this article is to show that it is possible to construct a model of competition based on the classical perspective (Smith, Ricardo, and Marx). An analysis of the work of the classics is presented, and their views of the workings of competition is contrasted with neoclassical and Keynesian approaches. A simple model, with two commodities, is constructed, in which the stability of the classical long-term equilibrium is shown (under certain conditions). This first model is developed to include the treatments of gravitation, rationing, deficiency in demand, choice of the technology, and three commodities. Copyright 1987 by Oxford University Press.

Suggested Citation

  • Dumenil, Gerard & Levy, Dominique, 1987. "The Dynamics of Competition: A Restoration of the Classical Analysis," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 11(2), pages 133-164, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:cambje:v:11:y:1987:i:2:p:133-64
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a
    for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lefteris Tsoulfidis, 2015. "Contending Conceptions of Competition and the Role of Regulating Capital," Panoeconomicus, Savez ekonomista Vojvodine, Novi Sad, Serbia, vol. 62(1), pages 15-31, March.
    2. Stefania Tescari & Andrea Vaona, 2014. "Regulating Rates of Return Do Gravitate in US Manufacturing!," Metroeconomica, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 65(3), pages 377-396, July.
    3. Lefteris Tsoulfidis & Persefoni Tsaliki, 2011. "Classical Competition and Regulating Capital: Theory and Empirical Evidence," Discussion Paper Series 2011_02, Department of Economics, University of Macedonia, revised Feb 2011.
    4. Vallès Codina, Oriol, 2023. "Business cycles, sectoral price stabilization, and climate change mitigation: A model of multi-sector growth in the tradition of the Bielefeld disequilibrium approach," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 216(C), pages 636-653.
    5. Frederic Lee & Tae-Hee Jo, 2011. "Social Surplus Approach and Heterodox Economics," Journal of Economic Issues, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 45(4), pages 857-876.
    6. Keiran Sharpe, 2006. "Effective demand in a stylised Keynesian model of growth," Review of Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(2), pages 173-191.
    7. Bresser-Pereira, Luiz Carlos & Lima, Gilberto Tadeu, 1996. "The relative autonomy of macroeconomics: a methodological approach," Textos para discussão 49, FGV EESP - Escola de Economia de São Paulo, Fundação Getulio Vargas (Brazil).
    8. Dumenil, Gerald & Levy, Dominique, 1995. "Structural change and prices of production," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 6(4), pages 397-434, December.
    9. Kiedrowski, Roman, 2018. "Profit rates equalization and balanced growth in a multi-sector model of classical competition," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 39-53.
    10. Neri Salvadori & Rodolfo Signorino, 2013. "The Classical Notion of Competition Revisited," History of Political Economy, Duke University Press, vol. 45(1), pages 149-175, Spring.
    11. Herscovici, A., 2006. "O modelo de Harrod: natureza das expectativas de longo prazo, instabilidade e não-linearidade," Revista Economia e Sociedade, Instituto de Economia, Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP), vol. 15, June.
    12. Marc van Wegberg, 1990. "Capital Mobility and Unequal Profit Rates: A Classical Theory of Competition by Boundedly Rational Firms," Review of Radical Political Economics, Union for Radical Political Economics, vol. 22(2-3), pages 1-16, June.
    13. Bellino, Enrico, 1999. "Convergence to long-run equilibrium--On some recent variations of the 'pure' cross-dual model," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 10(2), pages 225-237, June.
    14. Yangyuzi Wang, 2024. "Stability of price and quantity to a long-run equilibrium: a dynamic Leontief model with bounded rationality," Evolutionary and Institutional Economics Review, Springer, vol. 21(2), pages 349-372, September.
    15. Lefteris Tsoulfidis, 2011. "Classical vs. Neoclassical Conceptions of Competition," Discussion Paper Series 2011_11, Department of Economics, University of Macedonia, revised Nov 2011.
    16. Pascal Seppecher, 2012. "Jamel, a Java Agent-based MacroEconomic Laboratory," Working Papers halshs-00697225, HAL.
    17. Alain Hersovici, 2005. "O modelo de instabilidade de Harrod: uma abordagem em termos de não linearidade," Working Papers 0020, Universidade Federal do Paraná, Department of Economics.
    18. Andrea Vaona, 2012. "Further econometric evidence on the gravitation and convergence of industrial rates of return on regulating capital," Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(1), pages 113-136.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:cambje:v:11:y:1987:i:2:p:133-64. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/cje .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.