IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/biomet/v104y2017i1p129-139..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Generalized R-squared for detecting dependence

Author

Listed:
  • X. Wang
  • B. Jiang
  • J. S. Liu

Abstract

SUMMARY Detecting dependence between two random variables is a fundamental problem. Although the Pearson correlation coefficient is effective for capturing linear dependence, it can be entirely powerless for detecting nonlinear and/or heteroscedastic patterns. We introduce a new measure, G-squared, to test whether two univariate random variables are independent and to measure the strength of their relationship. The G-squared statistic is almost identical to the square of the Pearson correlation coefficient, R-squared, for linear relationships with constant error variance, and has the intuitive meaning of the piecewise R-squared between the variables. It is particularly effective in handling nonlinearity and heteroscedastic errors. We propose two estimators of G-squared and show their consistency. Simulations demonstrate that G-squared estimators are among the most powerful test statistics compared with several state-of-the-art methods.

Suggested Citation

  • X. Wang & B. Jiang & J. S. Liu, 2017. "Generalized R-squared for detecting dependence," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 104(1), pages 129-139.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:biomet:v:104:y:2017:i:1:p:129-139.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/biomet/asw071
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. L Weihs & M Drton & N Meinshausen, 2018. "Symmetric rank covariances: a generalized framework for nonparametric measures of dependence," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 105(3), pages 547-562.
    2. Ćmiel, Bogdan & Ledwina, Teresa, 2020. "Validation of association," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 55-67.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:biomet:v:104:y:2017:i:1:p:129-139.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/biomet .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.