IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/biomet/v103y2016i3p683-700..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Intrinsic efficiency and multiple robustness in longitudinal studies with drop-out

Author

Listed:
  • Peisong Han

Abstract

Intrinsic efficiency and multiple robustness are desirable properties in missing data analysis. We establish both for estimating the mean of a response at the end of a longitudinal study with drop-out. The idea is to calibrate the estimated missingness probability at each visit using data from past visits. We consider one working model for the missingness probability and multiple working models for the data distribution. Intrinsic efficiency guarantees that, when the missingness probability is correctly modelled, the multiple data distribution models, combined with data prior to the end of the study, are optimally accommodated to maximize efficiency. The efficiency generally increases with the number of data distribution models, except where one such model is correctly specified as well, in which case all the proposed estimators attain the semiparametric efficiency bound. Multiple robustness ensures estimation consistency if the missingness probability model is misspecified but one data distribution model is correct. Our proposed estimators are all convex combinations of the observed responses, and thus always fall within the parameter space.

Suggested Citation

  • Peisong Han, 2016. "Intrinsic efficiency and multiple robustness in longitudinal studies with drop-out," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 103(3), pages 683-700.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:biomet:v:103:y:2016:i:3:p:683-700.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/biomet/asw024
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jing Qin & Biao Zhang, 2007. "Empirical‐likelihood‐based inference in missing response problems and its application in observational studies," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 69(1), pages 101-122, February.
    2. Rubin Daniel B & van der Laan Mark J., 2008. "Empirical Efficiency Maximization: Improved Locally Efficient Covariate Adjustment in Randomized Experiments and Survival Analysis," The International Journal of Biostatistics, De Gruyter, vol. 4(1), pages 1-40, May.
    3. Tan Zhiqiang, 2008. "Comment: Improved Local Efficiency and Double Robustness," The International Journal of Biostatistics, De Gruyter, vol. 4(1), pages 1-9, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Chen, Sixia & Haziza, David, 2023. "A unified framework of multiply robust estimation approaches for handling incomplete data," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).
    2. Peisong Han & Linglong Kong & Jiwei Zhao & Xingcai Zhou, 2019. "A general framework for quantile estimation with incomplete data," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 81(2), pages 305-333, April.
    3. Lan Wen & Miguel A. Hernán & James M. Robins, 2022. "Multiply robust estimators of causal effects for survival outcomes," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 49(3), pages 1304-1328, September.
    4. Shixiao Zhang & Peisong Han & Changbao Wu, 2023. "Calibration Techniques Encompassing Survey Sampling, Missing Data Analysis and Causal Inference," International Statistical Review, International Statistical Institute, vol. 91(2), pages 165-192, August.
    5. Lucia Babino & Andrea Rotnitzky & James Robins, 2019. "Multiple robust estimation of marginal structural mean models for unconstrained outcomes," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 75(1), pages 90-99, March.
    6. Vahe Avagyan & Stijn Vansteelandt, 2021. "Stable inverse probability weighting estimation for longitudinal studies," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 48(3), pages 1046-1067, September.
    7. Sean Yiu & Li Su, 2022. "Joint calibrated estimation of inverse probability of treatment and censoring weights for marginal structural models," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 78(1), pages 115-127, March.
    8. Chixiang Chen & Biyi Shen & Aiyi Liu & Rongling Wu & Ming Wang, 2021. "A multiple robust propensity score method for longitudinal analysis with intermittent missing data," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 77(2), pages 519-532, June.
    9. Hamori, Shigeyuki & Motegi, Kaiji & Zhang, Zheng, 2019. "Calibration estimation of semiparametric copula models with data missing at random," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 85-109.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wang, Qihua & Su, Miaomiao & Wang, Ruoyu, 2021. "A beyond multiple robust approach for missing response problem," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    2. Han, Peisong, 2012. "A note on improving the efficiency of inverse probability weighted estimator using the augmentation term," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 82(12), pages 2221-2228.
    3. Peisong Han, 2016. "Combining Inverse Probability Weighting and Multiple Imputation to Improve Robustness of Estimation," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 43(1), pages 246-260, March.
    4. Tan, Zhiqiang, 2014. "Second-order asymptotic theory for calibration estimators in sampling and missing-data problems," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 240-253.
    5. Guo, Xu & Fang, Yun & Zhu, Xuehu & Xu, Wangli & Zhu, Lixing, 2018. "Semiparametric double robust and efficient estimation for mean functionals with response missing at random," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 325-339.
    6. Igari, Ryosuke & Hoshino, Takahiro, 2018. "A Bayesian data combination approach for repeated durations under unobserved missing indicators: Application to interpurchase-timing in marketing," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 150-166.
    7. Jaeger, Adam & Lazar, Nicole A., 2020. "Split sample empirical likelihood," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 150(C).
    8. Satoshi Hattori & Masayuki Henmi, 2014. "Stratified doubly robust estimators for the average causal effect," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 70(2), pages 270-277, June.
    9. Liugen Xue, 2009. "Empirical Likelihood Confidence Intervals for Response Mean with Data Missing at Random," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 36(4), pages 671-685, December.
    10. Dasom Lee & Shu Yang & Lin Dong & Xiaofei Wang & Donglin Zeng & Jianwen Cai, 2023. "Improving trial generalizability using observational studies," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 79(2), pages 1213-1225, June.
    11. Xie Yanmei & Zhang Biao, 2017. "Empirical Likelihood in Nonignorable Covariate-Missing Data Problems," The International Journal of Biostatistics, De Gruyter, vol. 13(1), pages 1-20, May.
    12. Xiaogang Duan & Guosheng Yin, 2017. "Ensemble Approaches to Estimating the Population Mean with Missing Response," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 44(4), pages 899-917, December.
    13. Xue, Liugen & Xue, Dong, 2011. "Empirical likelihood for semiparametric regression model with missing response data," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 102(4), pages 723-740, April.
    14. Zhiwei Zhang & Zhen Chen & James F. Troendle & Jun Zhang, 2012. "Causal Inference on Quantiles with an Obstetric Application," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 68(3), pages 697-706, September.
    15. Wang, Qihua & Lai, Peng, 2011. "Empirical likelihood calibration estimation for the median treatment difference in observational studies," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 55(4), pages 1596-1609, April.
    16. Liu, Tianqing & Yuan, Xiaohui & Li, Zhaohai & Li, Yuanzhang, 2013. "Empirical and weighted conditional likelihoods for matched case-control studies with missing covariates," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 185-199.
    17. David Benkeser & Iván Díaz & Alex Luedtke & Jodi Segal & Daniel Scharfstein & Michael Rosenblum, 2021. "Improving precision and power in randomized trials for COVID‐19 treatments using covariate adjustment, for binary, ordinal, and time‐to‐event outcomes," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 77(4), pages 1467-1481, December.
    18. Helene Boistard & Guillaume Chauvet & David Haziza, 2016. "Doubly Robust Inference for the Distribution Function in the Presence of Missing Survey Data," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 43(3), pages 683-699, September.
    19. van der Laan Mark J., 2010. "Targeted Maximum Likelihood Based Causal Inference: Part I," The International Journal of Biostatistics, De Gruyter, vol. 6(2), pages 1-45, February.
    20. Takahiro Hoshino & Ryosuke Igari, 2017. "Quasi-Bayesian Inference for Latent Variable Models with External Information: Application to generalized linear mixed models for biased data," Keio-IES Discussion Paper Series 2017-014, Institute for Economics Studies, Keio University.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:biomet:v:103:y:2016:i:3:p:683-700.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/biomet .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.