IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v30y2019i4p1123-1135..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effects of manipulated levels of predation threat on parental provisioning and nestling begging

Author

Listed:
  • Ariane Mutzel
  • Anne-Lise Olsen
  • Kimberley J Mathot
  • Yimen G Araya-Ajoy
  • Marion Nicolaus
  • Jan J Wijmenga
  • Jonathan Wright
  • Bart Kempenaers
  • Niels J Dingemanse

Abstract

Parental provisioning behavior is a major determinant of offspring growth and survival, but high provisioning rates might come at the cost of increased predation threat. Parents should thus adjust provisioning activity according to current predation threat levels. Moreover, life-history theory predicts that response to predation threat should be correlated with investment in current reproduction. We experimentally manipulated perceived predation threat in free-living great tits (Parus major) by presenting parents with a nest predator model while monitoring different aspects of provisioning behavior and nestling begging. Experiments were conducted in 2 years differing greatly in ecological conditions, including food availability. We further quantified male territorial aggressiveness and male and female exploratory tendency. Parents adjusted provisioning according to current levels of threat in an apparently adaptive way. They delayed nest visits during periods of elevated perceived predation threat and subsequently compensated for lost feeding opportunities by increasing provisioning once the immediate threat had diminished. Nestling begging increased after elevated levels of predation threat, but returned to baseline levels by the end of the experiment, suggesting that parents had fully compensated for lost feeding opportunities. There was no evidence for a link between male exploration behavior or aggressiveness and provisioning behavior. In contrast, fast-exploring females provisioned at higher rates, but only in the year with poor environmental conditions, which might indicate a greater willingness to invest in current reproduction in general. Future work should assess whether these personality-related differences in delivery rates under harsher conditions came at a cost of reduced residual reproductive value. Parental provisioning increases offspring survival but might attract predators towards adults and offspring. We show that parent birds reduce provisioning initially in response to a model nest predator, but compensate for lost feeding opportunities once the immediate threat has diminished. Mothers that worked harder to provision young at higher levels were also the ones more willing to take risks in nonprovisioning contexts, suggesting individual differences in how the trade-off between current and future reproduction is resolved.

Suggested Citation

  • Ariane Mutzel & Anne-Lise Olsen & Kimberley J Mathot & Yimen G Araya-Ajoy & Marion Nicolaus & Jan J Wijmenga & Jonathan Wright & Bart Kempenaers & Niels J Dingemanse, 2019. "Effects of manipulated levels of predation threat on parental provisioning and nestling begging," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 30(4), pages 1123-1135.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:30:y:2019:i:4:p:1123-1135.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/arz060
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Marion Nicolaus & Solange C Y Barrault & Christiaan Both, 2019. "Diet and provisioning rate differ predictably between dispersing and philopatric pied flycatchers," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 30(1), pages 114-124.
    2. Susana I. Peluc & T. Scott Sillett & John T. Rotenberry & Cameron K. Ghalambor, 2008. "Adaptive phenotypic plasticity in an island songbird exposed to a novel predation risk," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 19(4), pages 830-835.
    3. Bates, Douglas & Mächler, Martin & Bolker, Ben & Walker, Steve, 2015. "Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 67(i01).
    4. C.A. Hinde, 2006. "Negotiation over offspring care?--a positive response to partner-provisioning rate in great tits," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 17(1), pages 6-12, January.
    5. Erica F. Stuber & Yimen G. Araya-Ajoy & Kimberley J. Mathot & Ariane Mutzel & Marion Nicolaus & Jan J. Wijmenga & Jakob C. Mueller & Niels J. Dingemanse, 2013. "Slow explorers take less risk: a problem of sampling bias in ecological studies," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 24(5), pages 1092-1098.
    6. Vallo Tilgar & Kadri Moks & Pauli Saag, 2011. "Predator-induced stress changes parental feeding behavior in pied flycatchers," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 22(1), pages 23-28.
    7. Sönke Eggers & Michael Griesser & Jan Ekman, 2005. "Predator-induced plasticity in nest visitation rates in the Siberian jay (Perisoreus infaustus)," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 16(1), pages 309-315, January.
    8. Shana M. Caro & Ashleigh S. Griffin & Camilla A. Hinde & Stuart A. West, 2016. "Unpredictable environments lead to the evolution of parental neglect in birds," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 7(1), pages 1-10, April.
    9. R. M. Kilner & D. G. Noble & N. B. Davies, 1999. "Signals of need in parent–offspring communication and their exploitation by the common cuckoo," Nature, Nature, vol. 397(6721), pages 667-672, February.
    10. Brian R. Smith & Daniel T. Blumstein, 2008. "Fitness consequences of personality: a meta-analysis," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 19(2), pages 448-455.
    11. Renée A. Duckworth, 2006. "Behavioral correlations across breeding contexts provide a mechanism for a cost of aggression," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 17(6), pages 1011-1019, November.
    12. Samantha C Patrick & Lucy E Browning, 2011. "Exploration Behaviour Is Not Associated with Chick Provisioning in Great Tits," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(10), pages 1-7, October.
    13. Paul G. McDonald & David R. Wilson & Christopher S. Evans, 2009. "Nestling begging increases predation risk, regardless of spectral characteristics or avian mobbing," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 20(4), pages 821-829.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Daiping Wang & Wenyuan Zhang & Shuai Yang & Xiang-Yi Li Richter, 2023. "Sex differences in avian parental care patterns vary across the breeding cycle," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-12, December.
    2. Helen R. Sofaer & T. Scott Sillett & Susana I. Peluc & Scott A. Morrison & Cameron K. Ghalambor, 2013. "Differential effects of food availability and nest predation risk on avian reproductive strategies," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 24(3), pages 698-707.
    3. Valentijn van den Brink & Vassilissa Dolivo & Xavier Falourd & Amélie N. Dreiss & Alexandre Roulin, 2012. "Melanic color-dependent antipredator behavior strategies in barn owl nestlings," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 23(3), pages 473-480.
    4. Szabolcs Számadó & Dániel Czégel & István Zachar, 2019. "One problem, too many solutions: How costly is honest signalling of need?," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(1), pages 1-13, January.
    5. Daniel T. Blumstein & Matthew B. Petelle & Tina W. Wey, 2013. "Defensive and social aggression: repeatable but independent," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 24(2), pages 457-461.
    6. JANSSENS, Jochen & DE CORTE, Annelies & SÖRENSEN, Kenneth, 2016. "Water distribution network design optimisation with respect to reliability," Working Papers 2016007, University of Antwerp, Faculty of Business and Economics.
    7. Raymond Hernandez & Elizabeth A. Pyatak & Cheryl L. P. Vigen & Haomiao Jin & Stefan Schneider & Donna Spruijt-Metz & Shawn C. Roll, 2021. "Understanding Worker Well-Being Relative to High-Workload and Recovery Activities across a Whole Day: Pilot Testing an Ecological Momentary Assessment Technique," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(19), pages 1-17, October.
    8. Christopher Hassall & Michael Nisbet & Evan Norcliffe & He Wang, 2024. "The Potential Health Benefits of Urban Tree Planting Suggested through Immersive Environments," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-12, February.
    9. Jie Zhao & Ji Chen & Damien Beillouin & Hans Lambers & Yadong Yang & Pete Smith & Zhaohai Zeng & Jørgen E. Olesen & Huadong Zang, 2022. "Global systematic review with meta-analysis reveals yield advantage of legume-based rotations and its drivers," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-9, December.
    10. F J Heather & D Z Childs & A M Darnaude & J L Blanchard, 2018. "Using an integral projection model to assess the effect of temperature on the growth of gilthead seabream Sparus aurata," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(5), pages 1-19, May.
    11. Valentina Krenz & Arjen Alink & Tobias Sommer & Benno Roozendaal & Lars Schwabe, 2023. "Time-dependent memory transformation in hippocampus and neocortex is semantic in nature," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-17, December.
    12. Morán-Ordóñez, Alejandra & Ameztegui, Aitor & De Cáceres, Miquel & de-Miguel, Sergio & Lefèvre, François & Brotons, Lluís & Coll, Lluís, 2020. "Future trade-offs and synergies among ecosystem services in Mediterranean forests under global change scenarios," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 45(C).
    13. Jack McDonnell & Thomas McKenna & Kathryn A. Yurkonis & Deirdre Hennessy & Rafael Andrade Moral & Caroline Brophy, 2023. "A Mixed Model for Assessing the Effect of Numerous Plant Species Interactions on Grassland Biodiversity and Ecosystem Function Relationships," Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics, Springer;The International Biometric Society;American Statistical Association, vol. 28(1), pages 1-19, March.
    14. Ana Pinto & Tong Yin & Marion Reichenbach & Raghavendra Bhatta & Pradeep Kumar Malik & Eva Schlecht & Sven König, 2020. "Enteric Methane Emissions of Dairy Cattle Considering Breed Composition, Pasture Management, Housing Conditions and Feeding Characteristics along a Rural-Urban Gradient in a Rising Megacity," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-18, December.
    15. Damian M. Herz & Manuel Bange & Gabriel Gonzalez-Escamilla & Miriam Auer & Keyoumars Ashkan & Petra Fischer & Huiling Tan & Rafal Bogacz & Muthuraman Muthuraman & Sergiu Groppa & Peter Brown, 2022. "Dynamic control of decision and movement speed in the human basal ganglia," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-15, December.
    16. Kathrin Stenchly & Marc Victor Hansen & Katharina Stein & Andreas Buerkert & Wilhelm Loewenstein, 2018. "Income Vulnerability of West African Farming Households to Losses in Pollination Services: A Case Study from Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-12, November.
    17. Dongyan Liu & Chongran Zhou & John K. Keesing & Oscar Serrano & Axel Werner & Yin Fang & Yingjun Chen & Pere Masque & Janine Kinloch & Aleksey Sadekov & Yan Du, 2022. "Wildfires enhance phytoplankton production in tropical oceans," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-9, December.
    18. Zhaogeng Yang & Yanhui Li & Peijin Hu & Jun Ma & Yi Song, 2020. "Prevalence of Anemia and its Associated Factors among Chinese 9-, 12-, and 14-Year-Old Children: Results from 2014 Chinese National Survey on Students Constitution and Health," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(5), pages 1-10, February.
    19. Marco Lopez-Cruz & Fernando M. Aguate & Jacob D. Washburn & Natalia Leon & Shawn M. Kaeppler & Dayane Cristina Lima & Ruijuan Tan & Addie Thompson & Laurence Willard Bretonne & Gustavo los Campos, 2023. "Leveraging data from the Genomes-to-Fields Initiative to investigate genotype-by-environment interactions in maize in North America," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-14, December.
    20. Baumann, Elias & Kern, Jana & Lessmann, Stefan, 2019. "Usage Continuance in Software-as-a-Service," IRTG 1792 Discussion Papers 2019-005, Humboldt University of Berlin, International Research Training Group 1792 "High Dimensional Nonstationary Time Series".

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:30:y:2019:i:4:p:1123-1135.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.