IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v30y2019i1p114-124..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Diet and provisioning rate differ predictably between dispersing and philopatric pied flycatchers

Author

Listed:
  • Marion Nicolaus
  • Solange C Y Barrault
  • Christiaan Both

Abstract

Dispersers should express different foraging or social behaviors than nondispersers to thrive in unfamiliar habitats. In pied flycatchers (Ficedula hypoleuca), “naive” dispersers (immigrants) had a more generalist diet and higher feeding rates compared with philopatric birds, but we found no difference in level of aggression. Males with more generalist diet fledged more young. This suggests that learning or early imprinting affects individual food and settlement choices and that dispersers adopt different life-history strategies.

Suggested Citation

  • Marion Nicolaus & Solange C Y Barrault & Christiaan Both, 2019. "Diet and provisioning rate differ predictably between dispersing and philopatric pied flycatchers," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 30(1), pages 114-124.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:30:y:2019:i:1:p:114-124.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/ary152
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ariane Mutzel & Anne-Lise Olsen & Kimberley J Mathot & Yimen G Araya-Ajoy & Marion Nicolaus & Jan J Wijmenga & Jonathan Wright & Bart Kempenaers & Niels J Dingemanse, 2019. "Effects of manipulated levels of predation threat on parental provisioning and nestling begging," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 30(4), pages 1123-1135.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:30:y:2019:i:1:p:114-124.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.