IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v29y2018i1p19-30..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Do wild ungulates experience higher stress with humans than with large carnivores?

Author

Listed:
  • Adam Zbyryt
  • Jakub W Bubnicki
  • Dries P J Kuijper
  • Martin Dehnhard
  • Marcin Churski
  • Krzysztof Schmidt
  • Bob WongHandling editor

Abstract

Predation is a major selective pressure for prey; however, whether it evokes stronger stress response relative to anthropogenic factors in wild populations of animals is not clear. We studied the stress levels in red deer and roe deer in 6 populations exposed to potentially different levels of stress. We showed that stress levels in wild ungulate populations are lower and less variable in areas with large carnivores than in carnivore-free areas where human-related factors predominate.

Suggested Citation

  • Adam Zbyryt & Jakub W Bubnicki & Dries P J Kuijper & Martin Dehnhard & Marcin Churski & Krzysztof Schmidt & Bob WongHandling editor, 2018. "Do wild ungulates experience higher stress with humans than with large carnivores?," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 29(1), pages 19-30.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:29:y:2018:i:1:p:19-30.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/arx142
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Youngjo Lee & John A. Nelder, 2006. "Double hierarchical generalized linear models (with discussion)," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 55(2), pages 139-185, April.
    2. Valeria Hochman & Burt P. Kotler, 2007. "Patch use, apprehension, and vigilance behavior of Nubian Ibex under perceived risk of predation," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 18(2), pages 368-374.
    3. Dries P.J. Kuijper & Jakub W. Bubnicki & Marcin Churski & Bjorn Mols & Pim van Hooft, 2015. "Context dependence of risk effects: wolves and tree logs create patches of fear in an old-growth forest," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 26(6), pages 1558-1568.
    4. Stewart Liley & Scott Creel, 2008. "What best explains vigilance in elk: characteristics of prey, predators, or the environment?," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 19(2), pages 245-254.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yanyuan Ma & Marc G. Genton, 2010. "Explicit estimating equations for semiparametric generalized linear latent variable models," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 72(4), pages 475-495, September.
    2. Bohua Yu & Wei Song & Yanqing Lang, 2017. "Spatial Patterns and Driving Forces of Greenhouse Land Change in Shouguang City, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(3), pages 1-15, March.
    3. Dries P.J. Kuijper & Jakub W. Bubnicki & Marcin Churski & Bjorn Mols & Pim van Hooft, 2015. "Context dependence of risk effects: wolves and tree logs create patches of fear in an old-growth forest," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 26(6), pages 1558-1568.
    4. Leckie, George, 2014. "runmixregls: A Program to Run the MIXREGLS Mixed-Effects Location Scale Software from within Stata," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 59(c02).
    5. Rabindra Nath Das & Jeong-Soo Park, 2012. "Discrepancy in regression estimates between log-normal and gamma: some case studies," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 39(1), pages 97-111, March.
    6. Sun-Joo Cho & Paul Boeck & Susan Embretson & Sophia Rabe-Hesketh, 2014. "Additive Multilevel Item Structure Models with Random Residuals: Item Modeling for Explanation and Item Generation," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 79(1), pages 84-104, January.
    7. Lee, Sangin & Lee, Youngjo & Pawitan, Yudi, 2018. "Sparse pathway-based prediction models for high-throughput molecular data," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 125-135.
    8. Lee, Sangin & Pawitan, Yudi & Lee, Youngjo, 2015. "A random-effect model approach for group variable selection," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 147-157.
    9. Peter McCullagh, 2008. "Sampling bias and logistic models," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 70(4), pages 643-677, September.
    10. I. Gijbels & I. Prosdocimi, 2011. "Smooth estimation of mean and dispersion function in extended generalized additive models with application to Italian induced abortion data," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(11), pages 2391-2411, December.
    11. Lee, Woojoo & Lim, Johan & Lee, Youngjo & del Castillo, Joan, 2011. "The hierarchical-likelihood approach to autoregressive stochastic volatility models," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 55(1), pages 248-260, January.
    12. Stephen R. Martin & Philippe Rast, 2022. "The Reliability Factor: Modeling Individual Reliability with Multiple Items from a Single Assessment," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 87(4), pages 1318-1342, December.
    13. Wu, Jianmin & Bentler, Peter M., 2013. "Limited information estimation in binary factor analysis: A review and extension," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 57(1), pages 392-403.
    14. Rezzy Eko Caraka & Yusra Yusra & Toni Toharudin & Rung-Ching Chen & Mohammad Basyuni & Vilzati Juned & Prana Ugiana Gio & Bens Pardamean, 2021. "Did Noise Pollution Really Improve during COVID-19? Evidence from Taiwan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-12, May.
    15. Yu, Dalei & Yau, Kelvin K.W., 2012. "Conditional Akaike information criterion for generalized linear mixed models," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 56(3), pages 629-644.
    16. Darcy R Visscher & Evelyn H Merrill, 2018. "Functional connectivity in ruminants: A generalized state-dependent modelling approach," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(6), pages 1-22, June.
    17. Kwon, Sunghoon & Oh, Seungyoung & Lee, Youngjo, 2016. "The use of random-effect models for high-dimensional variable selection problems," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 401-412.
    18. Jiin Choi & Stewart J. Anderson & Thomas J. Richards & Wesley K. Thompson, 2014. "Prediction of transplant-free survival in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis patients using joint models for event times and mixed multivariate longitudinal data," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 41(10), pages 2192-2205, October.
    19. Yudi Pawitan & Youngjo Lee, 2017. "Wallet Game: Probability, Likelihood, and Extended Likelihood," The American Statistician, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 71(2), pages 120-122, April.
    20. Meza, Cristian & Jaffrézic, Florence & Foulley, Jean-Louis, 2009. "Estimation in the probit normal model for binary outcomes using the SAEM algorithm," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 53(4), pages 1350-1360, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:29:y:2018:i:1:p:19-30.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.