IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v29y2018i1p1-11..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Indirect genetic effects in behavioral ecology: does behavior play a special role in evolution?

Author

Listed:
  • Nathan W Bailey
  • Lucas Marie-Orleach
  • Allen J Moore
  • Leigh SimmonsEditor-in-Chief

Abstract

Behaviour is highly flexible, but does this make it special compared to other types of traits? We review how considering indirect genetic effects—the influence of genes expressed by social partners—can inform behavioural ecology research by improving predictions of behavioural optima in different social, evolutionary and ecological contexts. We argue that this framework is ideal for empirically testing behaviour’s proposed, yet heavily debated, unique role in shaping evolutionary patterns and processes.

Suggested Citation

  • Nathan W Bailey & Lucas Marie-Orleach & Allen J Moore & Leigh SimmonsEditor-in-Chief, 2018. "Indirect genetic effects in behavioral ecology: does behavior play a special role in evolution?," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 29(1), pages 1-11.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:29:y:2018:i:1:p:1-11.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/arx127
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Genevieve M. Kozak & Janette Wenrick Boughman, 2008. "Experience influences shoal member preference in a species pair of sticklebacks," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 19(3), pages 667-676.
    2. Genevieve M. Kozak & Janette W. Boughman, 2009. "Learned conspecific mate preference in a species pair of sticklebacks," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 20(6), pages 1282-1288.
    3. Darren Rebar & Marlene Zuk & Nathan W. Bailey, 2011. "Mating experience in field crickets modifies pre- and postcopulatory female choice in parallel," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 22(2), pages 303-309.
    4. Francesca Santostefano & Alastair J. Wilson & Yimen G. Araya-Ajoy & Niels J. Dingemanse, 2016. "Interacting with the enemy: indirect effects of personality on conspecific aggression in crickets," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 27(4), pages 1235-1246.
    5. Amelie Baud & Megan K Mulligan & Francesco Paolo Casale & Jesse F Ingels & Casey J Bohl & Jacques Callebert & Jean-Marie Launay & Jon Krohn & Andres Legarra & Robert W Williams & Oliver Stegle, 2017. "Genetic Variation in the Social Environment Contributes to Health and Disease," PLOS Genetics, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(1), pages 1-25, January.
    6. Tim W. Fawcett & Steven Hamblin & Luc-Alain Giraldeau, 2013. "Exposing the behavioral gambit: the evolution of learning and decision rules," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 24(1), pages 2-11.
    7. Kevin Laland & Tobias Uller & Marc Feldman & Kim Sterelny & Gerd B. Müller & Armin Moczek & Eva Jablonka & John Odling-Smee & Gregory A. Wray & Hopi E. Hoekstra & Douglas J. Futuyma & Richard E. Lensk, 2014. "Does evolutionary theory need a rethink?," Nature, Nature, vol. 514(7521), pages 161-164, October.
    8. Reuven Dukas, 2005. "Learning affects mate choice in female fruit flies," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 16(4), pages 800-804, July.
    9. Darren Rebar & Flavia Barbosa & Michael D. Greenfield, 2016. "Acoustic experience influences male and female pre- and postcopulatory behaviors in a bushcricket," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 27(2), pages 434-443.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ben J M Jarrett & Rebecca M Kilner & Leigh SimmonsEditor-in-Chief, 2018. "“Why†and “How†behavior evolves: a comment on Bailey et al," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 29(1), pages 15-16.
    2. Derek A Roff & Leigh SimmonsEditor-in-Chief, 2018. "Are indirect genetic effects in behavioral ecology important? A comment on Bailey et al," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 29(1), pages 14-15.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jason Keagy & Jean-François Savard & Gerald Borgia, 2012. "Cognitive ability and the evolution of multiple behavioral display traits," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 23(2), pages 448-456.
    2. Demetra Andreou & Christophe Eizaguirre & Thomas Boehm & Manfred Milinski, 2017. "Mate choice in sticklebacks reveals that immunogenes can drive ecological speciation," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 28(4), pages 953-961.
    3. Saiyed, Abrar Ali & Wierenga, Marleen & Fernhaber, Stephanie A. & Nummela, Niina, 2023. "From grassroots to international markets: A qualitative study of marginalized entrepreneurs in India," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 32(5).
    4. Anna Favati & Hanne Løvlie & Olof Leimar, 2017. "Individual aggression, but not winner–loser effects, predicts social rank in male domestic fowl," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 28(3), pages 874-882.
    5. Jeffrey S McKinnon & Nick Hamele & Nicole Frey & Jennifer Chou & Leia McAleavey & Jess Greene & Windi Paulson, 2012. "Male Choice in the Stream-Anadromous Stickleback Complex," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(6), pages 1-8, June.
    6. Dridi, Slimane & Lehmann, Laurent, 2014. "On learning dynamics underlying the evolution of learning rules," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 20-36.
    7. Erica F. Stuber & Yimen G. Araya-Ajoy & Kimberley J. Mathot & Ariane Mutzel & Marion Nicolaus & Jan J. Wijmenga & Jakob C. Mueller & Niels J. Dingemanse, 2013. "Slow explorers take less risk: a problem of sampling bias in ecological studies," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 24(5), pages 1092-1098.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:29:y:2018:i:1:p:1-11.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.