IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pcbi00/1011840.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A neural network model for the evolution of learning in changing environments

Author

Listed:
  • Magdalena Kozielska
  • Franz J Weissing

Abstract

Learning from past experience is an important adaptation and theoretical models may help to understand its evolution. Many of the existing models study simple phenotypes and do not consider the mechanisms underlying learning while the more complex neural network models often make biologically unrealistic assumptions and rarely consider evolutionary questions. Here, we present a novel way of modelling learning using small neural networks and a simple, biology-inspired learning algorithm. Learning affects only part of the network, and it is governed by the difference between expectations and reality. We use this model to study the evolution of learning under various environmental conditions and different scenarios for the trade-off between exploration (learning) and exploitation (foraging). Efficient learning readily evolves in our individual-based simulations. However, in line with previous studies, the evolution of learning is less likely in relatively constant environments, where genetic adaptation alone can lead to efficient foraging, or in short-lived organisms that cannot afford to spend much of their lifetime on exploration. Once learning does evolve, the characteristics of the learning strategy (i.e. the duration of the learning period and the learning rate) and the average performance after learning are surprisingly little affected by the frequency and/or magnitude of environmental change. In contrast, an organism’s lifespan and the distribution of resources in the environment have a clear effect on the evolved learning strategy: a shorter lifespan or a broader resource distribution lead to fewer learning episodes and larger learning rates. Interestingly, a longer learning period does not always lead to better performance, indicating that the evolved neural networks differ in the effectiveness of learning. Overall, however, we show that a biologically inspired, yet relatively simple, learning mechanism can evolve to lead to an efficient adaptation in a changing environment.Author summary: The ability to learn from experience is an important adaptation. However, it is still unclear how learning is shaped by natural selection. Here, we present a novel way of modelling the evolution of learning using small neural networks and a simple, biology-inspired learning mechanism. Computer simulations reveal that efficient learning readily evolves in this model. However, the evolution of learning is less likely in relatively constant environments (where evolved inborn preferences can guide animal behaviour) and in short-lived organisms (that cannot afford to spend much of their lifetime on learning). If learning does evolve, the evolved learning strategy is strongly affected by the lifespan and environmental richness but surprisingly little by the rate and degree of environmental change. In summary, we show that a simple and biologically plausible mechanism can help understand the evolution of learning and the structure of the evolved learning strategies.

Suggested Citation

  • Magdalena Kozielska & Franz J Weissing, 2024. "A neural network model for the evolution of learning in changing environments," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(1), pages 1-24, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1011840
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1011840
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1011840
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1011840&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1011840?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Aoki, Kenichi & Feldman, Marcus W., 2014. "Evolution of learning strategies in temporally and spatially variable environments: A review of theory," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 3-19.
    2. Tim W. Fawcett & Steven Hamblin & Luc-Alain Giraldeau, 2013. "Exposing the behavioral gambit: the evolution of learning and decision rules," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 24(1), pages 2-11.
    3. Dridi, Slimane & Lehmann, Laurent, 2014. "On learning dynamics underlying the evolution of learning rules," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 20-36.
    4. Slimane Dridi & Laurent Lehmann, 2016. "Environmental complexity favors the evolution of learning," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 27(3), pages 842-850.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. repec:plo:pcbi00:1006647 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Nathan W Bailey & Lucas Marie-Orleach & Allen J Moore & Leigh SimmonsEditor-in-Chief, 2018. "Indirect genetic effects in behavioral ecology: does behavior play a special role in evolution?," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 29(1), pages 1-11.
    3. Dominik Deffner & Anne Kandler, 2019. "Trait specialization, innovation, and the evolution of culture in fluctuating environments," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 5(1), pages 1-10, December.
    4. Ram, Yoav & Liberman, Uri & Feldman, Marcus W., 2019. "Vertical and oblique cultural transmission fluctuating in time and in space," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 11-19.
    5. Mullon, Charles & Lehmann, Laurent, 2017. "Invasion fitness for gene–culture co-evolution in family-structured populations and an application to cumulative culture under vertical transmission," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 33-46.
    6. Dominik Deffner & David Mezey & Benjamin Kahl & Alexander Schakowski & Pawel Romanczuk & Charley M. Wu & Ralf H. J. M. Kurvers, 2024. "Collective incentives reduce over-exploitation of social information in unconstrained human groups," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-13, December.
    7. Ohtsuki, Hisashi & Wakano, Joe Yuichiro & Kobayashi, Yutaka, 2017. "Inclusive fitness analysis of cumulative cultural evolution in an island-structured population," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 13-23.
    8. Dridi, Slimane & Lehmann, Laurent, 2014. "On learning dynamics underlying the evolution of learning rules," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 20-36.
    9. Pieter Berg & TuongVan Vu & Lucas Molleman, 2024. "Unpredictable benefits of social information can lead to the evolution of individual differences in social learning," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-10, December.
    10. Kobayashi, Yutaka & Ohtsuki, Hisashi, 2014. "Evolution of social versus individual learning in a subdivided population revisited: Comparative analysis of three coexistence mechanisms using the inclusive-fitness method," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 78-87.
    11. Shogo Homma & Masanori Takezawa, 2024. "Risk preference as an outcome of evolutionarily adaptive learning mechanisms: An evolutionary simulation under diverse risky environments," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(8), pages 1-22, August.
    12. Aoki, Kenichi, 2015. "Modeling abrupt cultural regime shifts during the Palaeolithic and Stone Age," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 6-12.
    13. Erica F. Stuber & Yimen G. Araya-Ajoy & Kimberley J. Mathot & Ariane Mutzel & Marion Nicolaus & Jan J. Wijmenga & Jakob C. Mueller & Niels J. Dingemanse, 2013. "Slow explorers take less risk: a problem of sampling bias in ecological studies," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 24(5), pages 1092-1098.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1011840. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ploscompbiol (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.